Re: Bits from the release team and request for discussion

Hi, On Sonntag, 2. August 2009, martin f krafft wrote: In the next announcement, I strongly suggest you approach this point. If you are syncing with Ubuntu LTS, then I suggest you state the reasons for doing so, e.g. that Canonical has agreed to provide security upgrades for squeeze). Oh,

Re: Rebuild packages depending on unversioned libvirt0

Hello, On Sun, 02 Aug 2009, Luk Claes wrote: due to the invalid symbols file in libvirt0 (#536482) some packages have to be rebuilt to get a properly versioned dependency... here comes the list. Can you please send an updated list, TIA? The list doesn't have to be updated AFAIK. The

Re: Rebuild packages depending on unversioned libc6

On Sun, 02 Aug 2009, Luk Claes wrote: I have not included ia64 as the fixed libc6 is not yet available there. I pinged lamont to get it rebuilt ASAP on ia64 (the buildd chroot needs to be ugraded for the build to succeed). I will provide a list for ia64 when it's available. Can you

Re: Stable update proposed for ganeti (fixing #528618)

On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 08:05:15PM +0200, Iustin Pop wrote: Hi, I'd like to update ganeti to stable-proposed-updates to fix the above bug. It's a simple one-line change; I see only one potential breakage out of it - if people already did the symlink fix pointed out in the bug, but with the

Re: Bits from the release team and request for discussion

also sprach Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org [2009.08.03.1047 +0200]: In the next announcement, I strongly suggest you approach this point. If you are syncing with Ubuntu LTS, then I suggest you state the reasons for doing so, e.g. that Canonical has agreed to provide security upgrades