Quoting Christian Perrier (bubu...@debian.org):
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package qmail
This NMU only adds a small bunch of translation updates. Please note
that this package is in non-free:
Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
On the other hand, is it really necessary a new group? Can't adm or
operator
be overloaded with this new functionality? (think Ockham's razor).
No. Both of those groups also have other meanings.
How about the root group?
signature.asc
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I'd like to request an unblock for fusionforge/5.0.2-3. The changes are
minimal, and come from a dozen upstream commits, some backported from
trunk. In terms of bugs closed: a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package fts
This NMU adds a few translation updates. Please note that the former
version if 0.1-4. There has been no 0.4-4.1 in the archive (that one
was uploaded by me but
[reply-to set to d-d only]
On 20/10/2010 07:12, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org):
On the other hand, is it really necessary a new group? Can't adm or
operator
be overloaded with this new functionality? (think Ockham's razor).
No. Both of those groups
Le Tuesday 19 October 2010 19:39:28 Mehdi Dogguy, vous avez écrit :
On 19/10/2010 02:43, Benoit Mortier wrote:
Le Monday 18 October 2010 22:58:38 Mehdi Dogguy, vous avez écrit :
On 09/24/2010 02:57 PM, Benoit Mortier wrote:
Le Friday 24 September 2010 13:49:16 Holger Levsen, vous avez écrit
Hello Release Team,
I have recently added the dkms feature to sysprof. The dkms feature is very
good, in that, it allows automatic building, installation and removal for
kernel modules on kernel installs/upgrades/removes.
I think it is a good feature to have. The version of sysprof (1.0.12-3)
[Michael Biebl]
One suggestion is to use group admin. Ubuntu has been using that
group for exactly the purpose what we are going for and I think it
is a pretty adequate name.
The Ubuntu use of the group 'admin' have caused some problems here at
the university where I work on integrating Ubuntu
Package: release.debian.org
foxtrotgps (0.99.4+debian3-3) unstable; urgency=medium
* Adding updated gpsd.patch from Timo Juhani Lindfors
timo.lindf...@iki.fi.
-- Daniel Baumann dan...@debian.org Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:45:01 +0200
foxtrotgps (0.99.4+debian3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
*
On 20/10/2010 11:18, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
So I would suggest to use a name that is more likely to be unique.
unique wrt. what? admin seems unique since not used in Debian yet.
Happy hacking,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2010 11:23:15 +0100
with message-id
c8d816d949f17f5cc5d0d99e29321d31.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600808: unblock: foxtrotgps/0.99.4+debian3-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #600808,
regarding unblock: foxtrotgps/0.99.4+debian3-3
to be
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 07:28:17PM +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
that diff is a hell to review... and as we are in deep freeze, and can't
easily remove that package (libvirt depends on it) i won't be able to
unblock it right now. So let's keep it in sid for a while and see what
happens.
I partly
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please unblock package panflute
I hereby ask for an unblock for 0.6.2-2 so paflute can migrate to
testing.
It fixes the following bugs:
Dear release managers,
I know that it is late but I recently got a security bug reports
so I believe I should fix it for squeeze.
It will fix a security bug (CVE-2010-3394).
I got a patch from Etienne Millon etienne.millon AT gmail.com
and after communication with Etienne and also with Raphael
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 at 10:01:07 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
I've uploaded a delayed/14 NMU for alsa-lib, for
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589896 (crashes due to
unloading plugins that are still in use), by backporting a patch from
upstream. Its diffstat looks like this:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear RT,
please unblock package colorname.
I just uploaded a new version to sid, fixes an RC bug (easy to fix, patch
attached).
unblock colorname/0.4+dfsg.1-2
--
. ''`. Debian
Maybe god ;-)
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 8:16 AM, Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org wrote:
On 20/10/2010 11:18, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
So I would suggest to use a name that is more likely to be unique.
unique wrt. what? admin seems unique since not used in Debian yet.
Happy hacking,
--
On 10/20/2010 02:30 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
After further discussion, and looking at the security issues which
upstream acknowledge being fixed in 5.3.3, please go ahead with the
upload to unstable.
Since Raphael said he wouldn't have time to work on PHP after after
October starts, I was
Mehdi,
Please could we have some progress on this. Sadly I am aware of
another copyright issue (and probably another if I dared looking) but I
will only handle one at a time.
Nicholas
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
We now have a 0.1+nmu1 . Please could this now be granted an
All different packages of course.
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
Please could we have some progress on this. Sadly I am aware of
another copyright issue (and probably another if I dared looking) but
I will only handle one at a time.
Nicholas
Nicholas Bamber wrote:
Mehdi,
We now
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package interchange
This new version only adds updated translations.
unblock interchange/5.7.6-2
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:45:16 +0100
with message-id 1287596716.28575.89.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600856: unblock: interchange/5.7.6-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #600856,
regarding unblock: interchange/5.7.6-2
to be marked as done.
This
I'll take care of it, I have already spoken with Raphael.
Ondrej Sury
On 20.10.2010, at 18:00, Thomas Goirand tho...@goirand.fr wrote:
On 10/20/2010 02:30 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
After further discussion, and looking at the security issues which
upstream acknowledge being fixed in 5.3.3,
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:58:26 +0200
with message-id 4cbf2dc2.7040...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600842: unblock: colorname/0.4+dfsg.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #600842,
regarding unblock: colorname/0.4+dfsg.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
* Simon McVittie [101020 14:54 +0100]:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 at 10:01:07 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
I've uploaded a delayed/14 NMU for alsa-lib, for
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589896 (crashes due to
unloading plugins that are still in use), by backporting a patch from
On 10/20/2010 01:40 PM, Michael Meskes wrote:
From a DD perspective I can understand your reasoning. However, from a user's
perspective I cannot, which might be one of the reasons why I wouldn't want to
be a release manager.
And as Debian tries to attract system administrators and not the
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 21:09 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
texmacs (1:1.0.7.4-3) unstable; urgency=high
* Contribution of Etienne Millon etienne.millon AT gmail.com.
Thanks for Etienne.
- Fix security issue CVE-2010-3394 (Closes: #598424)
Unblocked.
Regards,
Adam
--
To
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 20:07:38 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
On 10/20/2010 01:40 PM, Michael Meskes wrote:
From a DD perspective I can understand your reasoning. However, from a
user's
perspective I cannot, which might be one of the reasons why I wouldn't want
to
be a release manager.
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:16:33 +0100
with message-id 1287598593.28575.215.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600794: unblock: fts/0.1-4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #600794,
regarding unblock: fts/0.1-4.2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 14:54:05 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 at 10:01:07 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
I've uploaded a delayed/14 NMU for alsa-lib, for
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=589896 (crashes due to
unloading plugins that are still in use), by
On 10/20/2010 08:17 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
And yet we're not updating the kernel to 2.6.36. If we need bugfixes in
squeeze, by all mean let's do that. Blindly updating to the latest
upstream version, not so much.
Guess you did not read the virtualbox changelog?
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:32:35 +0100
with message-id 1287599555.28575.280.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600775: unblock: gnome-settings-daemon/2.30.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #600775,
regarding unblock: gnome-settings-daemon/2.30.2-2
to be
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package kexec-tools
Packages kexec-tools was updated to inlcude building of udeb package as
well as requested by debian installer team and three new translations
were
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 20:31:54 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
Guess you did not read the virtualbox changelog?
http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog
Nobody is saying the new version doesn't fix bugs, we're saying we can't
review it.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital
- ask ftp masters for a removal of DTC in Squeeze, then I'll use
backports.d.o (all my messages to this thread are to avoid this which
would really make me sad for all the time of Squeeze until Wheezy...).
If you guys stick to the above list, that's the only solution.
We don't need to
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2010 20:54:05 +0100
with message-id 1287604445.28575.610.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#599357: unblock wireshark/1.2.11-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #599357,
regarding unblock: wireshark/1.2.11-3
to be marked as done.
This means
Hi,
There are currently some udeb-producing packages which are neither on
the needs approval from a d-i RM before migrating list, nor the
explicit can migrate at will list; from a quick scan, many of them
appear to be kfreebsd related. I've listed these below; please could
you confirm whether
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2010 21:16:50 +0100
with message-id 1287605810.28575.728.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600863: unblock: kexec-tools/1:2.0.1-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #600863,
regarding unblock: kexec-tools/1:2.0.1-4
to be marked as done.
This
On 2010-10-18, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On 2010-10-15, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On 2010-10-11, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On 2010-10-06, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
On 2010-10-01, Moritz Muehlenhoff j...@inutil.org wrote:
Hi,
I
On 10/20/2010 10:37 PM, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
flash-kernel/2.33 - No CVE yet
mailscanner/4.79.11-2.1 - CVE-2010-3095
Both unblocked.
Cheers,
--
Mehdi Dogguy مهدي الدڤي
http://dogguy.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi!
Please unblock package update-inetd/4.38. The only change is:
update-inetd (4.38) unstable; urgency=low
* debconf template translations:
- Update Danish (thanks, Joe Dalton;
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:58:04 +0200
with message-id 4cbf57dc.8070...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600703: unblock: qmail/1.03-49.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #600703,
regarding unblock: qmail/1.03-49.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:56:09 +0200
with message-id 4cbf5769.5020...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600873: unblock: update-inetd/4.38
has caused the Debian Bug report #600873,
regarding unblock: update-inetd/4.38
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hello,
after someone got bitten by #575891 while running a lenny chroot
on a btrfs filesystem, Julien Cristau suggested me to try to fix this bug
in stable.
Would you accept a stable upload with the attached patch ?
It's a relatively simple cherry pick of the fix made in the current
version.
Your message dated Wed, 20 Oct 2010 22:23:26 +0100
with message-id 1287609806.28575.1059.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#600145: freeze exception: openarena/0.8.5-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #600145,
regarding freeze exception: openarena/0.8.5-5
to be marked as
On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 19:15:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 21:09 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
texmacs (1:1.0.7.4-3) unstable; urgency=high
* Contribution of Etienne Millon etienne.millon AT gmail.com.
Thanks for Etienne.
- Fix security issue CVE-2010-3394
46 matches
Mail list logo
