[SRM] Proposed NMU, gif2png to oldstable/stable (PRSC)

2011-02-25 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi, The attached diffs are for a proposed NMU of gif2png to fix CVE-2010-4694 and CVE-2010-4695 in the stable suites. In stable, the existing patch is extended based on the maintainer's upload in sid. In oldstable, the entire patch is backported because it hadn't yet been applied at all. The

Bug#615062: nmu: packages broken by #613848

2011-02-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Hello, Here is a binNMU request for packages that are broken by the (mini-)transition tracked with #613848. I've simulated it on amd64, and everything compiles [1] except ocaml-melt which

Processed: block 613848 with 615062

2011-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 613848 with 615062 Bug #613848 [release.debian.org] (mini-)transition of OCaml libraries: camlp5, lablgtk2, ... Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 613848: 615062 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

[SRM] upload of debian-reference/2.46 to stable

2011-02-25 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, Please approve uploading of debian-reference (2.46) to stable. (I am resending this with proper title. Debian web pages have been updated by already commited changes.) Basically, [VUA 76-1] volatile replaced by new updates suite

Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?

2011-02-25 Thread Matthias Klose
On 25.02.2011 08:46, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Matthias asks: did you check, that all gcc versions do build with the new version on all architectures, and that the gcc testsuite doesn't show regressions with the new version? will gcc continue to work, while re-building mpfr and mpclib with the

Bug#615062: nmu: packages broken by #613848

2011-02-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 13:21 +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: Here is a binNMU request for packages that are broken by the (mini-)transition tracked with #613848. I've simulated it on amd64, and everything compiles [1] except ocaml-melt which seems broken by an external bug [2, not investigated

Bug#615062: marked as done (nmu: packages broken by #613848)

2011-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2011 16:39:43 +0100 with message-id 4d67cd3f.5040...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#615062: nmu: packages broken by #613848 has caused the Debian Bug report #615062, regarding nmu: packages broken by #613848 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#615091: pu: package cmake/2.8.2+dsfg.1-0+squeeze1

2011-02-25 Thread Modestas Vainius
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu An upload of the new orig tarball (dsfg'ed) to fix #614390 in stable. Files which will be removed can be seen at [2]. Plus respective debian/copyright changes. 1.

Bug#613433: pu: package git/1:1.7.2.5-1

2011-02-25 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 14:51:29 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: The git package in stable is currently based against v1.7.2.3. Junio is conservative about not making risky changes to the maint-1.7.2 branch, so I would like to update the Debian packaging to v1.7.2.5.

Bug#615129: RM: qt-x11-free/3:3.3.8b-7, kdelibs/4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-5

2011-02-25 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Tags: moreinfo Hi, There seems to be some interest in removing kde3 and qt3 before wheezy is released. This bug is meant to track that process and request removal of those packages from

Bug#613433: pu: package git/1:1.7.2.5-1

2011-02-25 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-02-25 at 16:21 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Based on http://release.debian.org/proposed-updates/stable.html and https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=gitsuite=squeeze this doesn't seem to have hit the autobuilders. Is that because of lack of arch-dependent binaries in

Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Raise severity for KDE3 / Qt3 removal reminder bugs (squeeze has been released)

2011-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # Julien Cristau wrote: # Jonathan Nieder wrote: # # Would anyone mind if I: # # 1. lower the severity of these bugs to important or lower # # Yes please. # # 2. file a bug against release.debian.org for this release goal and #

Bug#615129: RM: qt-x11-free/3:3.3.8b-7, kdelibs/4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-5

2011-02-25 Thread Ana Guerrero
Hi Jonathan, On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 04:29:45PM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Tags: moreinfo Hi, There seems to be some interest in removing kde3 and qt3 before wheezy is

Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Raise severity for KDE3 / Qt3 removal reminder bugs (squeeze has been released)

2011-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: # block 615129 by 604301 # retitle 615129 kpcisim: please port to Qt 4/KDE 4 # severity 615129 important # tags 615129 - sid wheezy # tags 615129 + upstream # # Oops. retitle 615129 RM: kdelibs/4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-5 Bug #615129

Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Raise severity for KDE3 / Qt3 removal reminder bugs (squeeze has been released)

2011-02-25 Thread Jonathan Nieder
Hi, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 03:11:52 -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote: 1. lower the severity of these bugs to important or lower Yes please. Based on response from #debian-qt-kde that was a bad idea on my part. Not wanting to spam people further, I'm leaving things as

Bug#615129: marked as done (RM: kdelibs/4:3.5.10.dfsg.1-5)

2011-02-25 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 25 Feb 2011 19:45:11 -0600 with message-id 20110226014511.GH6339@elie and subject line Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Raise severity for KDE3 / Qt3 removal reminder bugs (squeeze has been released) has caused the Debian Bug report #615129, regarding RM:

Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?

2011-02-25 Thread Steve M. Robbins
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:57:28PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote: On 25.02.2011 08:46, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Clearly one should be mindful of the effect on GCC -- that's why I asked the question on debian-gcc. Do you have any specific concerns? Have any concerns been raised on the GCC

Bug#613848: Bug#615140: libsoundtouch-dev: needs to provide libsoundtouch1-dev

2011-02-25 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 26/02/2011 01:38, Julien Cristau a écrit : Package: libsoundtouch-dev Version: 1.5.0-3 Severity: serious Justification: i said so Apparently you decided to start a SONAME transition with no coordination with the release team. This will clash with the ongoing transition to ffmpeg 0.6,