Re: SE Linux policy update

2011-03-19 Thread Russell Coker
On Sat, 12 Mar 2011, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: * Allow user domains to execute mysqld_exec_t, for KDE * Allow user_dbusd_t to execute gconfd_exec_t in user_gconfd_t. That's this change? + + optional_policy(` + gnome_role($2, $1_dbusd_t)

Bug#618871: transition: ocaml

2011-03-19 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hello, The Debian OCaml team is ready for a transition to OCaml 3.12.0. All packages depending on ocaml-base-nox-3.11.2 and ocaml-base-3.11.2 will be affected. I am waiting for the

Re: SE Linux policy update

2011-03-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 14:58 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: On Sat, 12 Mar 2011, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: On Fri, 2011-03-11 at 23:21 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: These are all serious updates that can be considered as a truly critical functionality problem for some

Re: SE Linux policy update

2011-03-19 Thread Russell Coker
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: They have all been tested on multiple systems. Also many of the changes are related to things that didn't work at all previously so there was little scope for regression. Okay. Apart from the one I just backed out.

Re: SE Linux policy update

2011-03-19 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 20:03 +1100, Russell Coker wrote: On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote: * Dontaudit bind_t write attempts to / for lwresd calling access(., W_OK) Don't audit Stops filling the logs when the daemon is just asking

Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?

2011-03-19 Thread Torbjorn Granlund
Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca writes: Dear GMP Developers, Is the following characterization of the changes between 4.3.2 and 5.0.1 accurate? On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 03:30:45PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: As far as I can tell, the incompatibilities introduced in gmp 5

Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?

2011-03-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 20:30:00 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 10:24:15AM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 21:17:47 -0500, Steve M. Robbins wrote: I'm working my way through the dependent packages shown at

Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?

2011-03-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:07:44 +0100, Torbjorn Granlund wrote: Steve M. Robbins st...@sumost.ca writes: Dear GMP Developers, Is the following characterization of the changes between 4.3.2 and 5.0.1 accurate? On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 03:30:45PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote:

Processed: block 618403 with 618135 614433 565002 618183 614483 606079 617656 618325 617657 ...

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 618403 with 618135 614433 565002 618183 614483 606079 617656 618325 617657 Bug #618403 [release.debian.org] VTK 5.6 transition Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 618403: 618183, 617656, 614433, 618135, 617657, 565002,

Processed: block 614726 with 617828

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 614726 with 617828 Bug #614726 [release.debian.org] FFmpeg 0.6 transition Was blocked by: 614958 555784 554310 614725 614467 614457 614727 614433 612482 614953 554061 612473 614447 606717 554340 614458 614996 618403 614954 614952 602349

Processed: block 618403 with 618666

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 618403 with 618666 Bug #618403 [release.debian.org] VTK 5.6 transition Was blocked by: 618183 617656 614433 618135 617657 565002 614483 606079 618325 Added blocking bug(s) of 618403: 618666 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact

Request for transition slot for eglibc

2011-03-19 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi release team, eglibc 2.13 starts to be in a good shape in experimental, it builds on all release architectures plus at least hurd, sh4 and sparc64. It still FTBFS on alpha and hppa. I fixed the build failures and some testsuite regressions, and I have asked the porters for help for the

Bug#612172: marked as done (pu: package apt-dater/0.8.4-4)

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:29 + with message-id 1300545030.15823.3680.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Closing bugs for packages released in 6.0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #612172, regarding pu: package apt-dater/0.8.4-4 to be marked as done. This

Bug#612342: marked as done (squeeze KDE updates (was Re: My last (hopefully) bits for KDE in Squeeze))

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:29 + with message-id 1300545030.15823.3680.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Closing bugs for packages released in 6.0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #612342, regarding squeeze KDE updates (was Re: My last (hopefully) bits for

Bug#612344: marked as done (squeeze KDE updates (was Re: My last (hopefully) bits for KDE in Squeeze))

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:29 + with message-id 1300545030.15823.3680.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Closing bugs for packages released in 6.0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #612342, regarding squeeze KDE updates (was Re: My last (hopefully) bits for

Bug#612819: marked as done (pu: package libapache-mod-jk/1.2.30-1)

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:29 + with message-id 1300545030.15823.3680.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Closing bugs for packages released in 6.0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #612819, regarding pu: package libapache-mod-jk/1.2.30-1 to be marked as done.

Bug#613151: marked as done (pu: package sobby/0.4.7-2+lenny1)

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:29 + with message-id 1300545030.15823.3680.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Closing bugs for packages released in 6.0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #613151, regarding pu: package sobby/0.4.7-2+lenny1 to be marked as done. This

Bug#613916: marked as done (pu: package libvirt/0.8.3-6+squeeze0)

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:29 + with message-id 1300545030.15823.3680.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Closing bugs for packages released in 6.0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #613916, regarding pu: package libvirt/0.8.3-6+squeeze0 to be marked as done.

Bug#614030: marked as done (pu: package ocsigen/1.3.3-1squeeze1)

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:29 + with message-id 1300545030.15823.3680.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Closing bugs for packages released in 6.0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #614030, regarding pu: package ocsigen/1.3.3-1squeeze1 to be marked as done.

Bug#615091: marked as done (pu: package cmake/2.8.2+dsfg.1-0+squeeze1)

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:29 + with message-id 1300545030.15823.3680.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Closing bugs for packages released in 6.0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #615091, regarding pu: package cmake/2.8.2+dsfg.1-0+squeeze1 to be marked as

Bug#616368: marked as done (pu: package clive/2.2.13-5+squeeze1)

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:29 + with message-id 1300545030.15823.3680.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Closing bugs for packages released in 6.0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #616368, regarding pu: package clive/2.2.13-5+squeeze1 to be marked as done.

Bug#617238: marked as done (pu: package mediawiki-extensions/2.3squeeze1)

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sat, 19 Mar 2011 14:30:29 + with message-id 1300545030.15823.3680.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org and subject line Closing bugs for packages released in 6.0.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #617238, regarding pu: package mediawiki-extensions/2.3squeeze1 to be marked as

Processed: block 616364 with 618666 616702

2011-03-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 616364 with 618666 616702 Bug #616364 [release.debian.org] transition: python-numpy Was blocked by: 588630 613207 611316 Added blocking bug(s) of 616364: 618666 and 616702 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

[SRM] Updates for samba 3.5.6

2011-03-19 Thread Christian PERRIER
(2nd attempt at this. The first I sent some days ago was incomplete, as pointed by Adam. Moreover, it wasn't clear that we weren't targeting the 6.0.1 release) Hello, The samba packaging team would like to upload a new version of samba 3.5.6 in squeeze (that would be 2:3.5.6~dfsg-3squeeze3).

Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?

2011-03-19 Thread Steve M. Robbins
Hi Julien, First, thanks for looking into the GMP issue. On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 03:30:45PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: As far as I can tell, the incompatibilities introduced in gmp 5 are the removal of mpn_bdivmod and mpn_neg_n, and the rest of the functions should

Re: GMP transition: 4.3.2 to 5.0.1?

2011-03-19 Thread Matthias Klose
On 17.03.2011 19:42, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 12:39:23 -0600, Steve M. Robbins wrote: Hi, Now that squeeze is out, I'd like to move from GMP 4 to GMP 5. The latter was released upstream about a year ago and the gmp lists aren't buzzing with outrageous bugs, so it