Re: [Pkg-openldap-devel] [SRM] (PRSC) Security fixes and possible database corruption

2011-03-29 Thread Matthijs Möhlmann
On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Thanks for working on fixing issues in stable.
 
 On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 22:41 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
 According to bug #617606 there are currently 2 CVE's open.
 CVE-2011-1024:
 [...]
 CVE-2011-1025:
 
 These look okay, although it doesn't appear that they've been resolved
 in unstable yet?  If so, that really should be done first.  Once the
 patches have been tested in unstable, we can then look again at applying
 them to stable.
 
 CVE-2011-1081:
 modrdn.c in slapd in OpenLDAP 2.4.x before 2.4.24 allows remote attackers to 
 cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a relative Distinguished Name 
 (DN) modification request (aka MODRDN operation) that contains an empty 
 value for the OldDN field.
 Fix: 
 http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/servers/slapd/modrdn.c.diff?hideattic=1r1=texttr1=1.181r2=texttr2=1.182f=c
 Impact: High, possibility to remotely crash slapd.
 
 The security tracker indicates that this CVE hasn't yet been checked for
 its applicability to and impact on Debian.  Have you confirmed with the
 security team that they don't wish to handle this?
 

No I havent confirmed with the security team. I'll file a ticket in their bug
tracking and then they can decide what to do. As suggested by Michael Gilbert.

 Then we have a possible database corruption (introduced by patch 
 service-operational-before-detach (debian specific))
 Fix: 
 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=10;filename=service-operational-before-detach;att=1;bug=616164
 Above fix is the new patch for service-operational-before-detach.
 
 Looking at the upstream commits, should servers/slapd/main.c r1.279 be
 included here?  As with the earlier patches, this should also be tested
 in unstable before being applied to stable.
 
 Regards,
 
 Adam

You are right, I shouldn't blindly copy patches. Thanks for the notice.

Regards,

Matthijs Möhlmann


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/0768c501-d485-46b5-8d34-ca8be419e...@cacholong.nl



Re: Bug#619990: developers-reference: Update of merkel.d.o URLs

2011-03-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
Hi,

On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Charles Plessy wrote:
  - For Britney, I do not find the equivalent on ries.d.o for the following:
merkel:/org/ftp-debian-org;/testing/update_out/
merkel:~aba/testing/update_out  Was it moved somewhere else ?

It's now part of release.debian.org and thus not mirrored
on ries.debian.org.

hertzog@ries:~$ ls -al /srv/ftp.debian.org/web/testing
lrwxrwxrwx 1 dak ftpteam 35  3 juil.  2010 /srv/ftp.debian.org/web/testing - 
/srv/release.debian.org/www/britney
hertzog@ries:~$ ls -al /srv/release.debian.org/www/britney
ls: cannot access /srv/release.debian.org/www/britney: No such file or directory

But I think it's not very important:
- the former is web accessible at 
http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_output/
- the latter is probably not really the reference implementation of britney 
anymore
  it can either be removed or replaced with 
  http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-release/britney1.git;a=summary and
  http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-release/britney2.git;a=summary

 Index: pkgs.dbk
 ===
 --- pkgs.dbk  (révision 8598)
 +++ pkgs.dbk  (copie de travail)
 @@ -2596,10 +2596,7 @@
  before or after this main run, depending on the exact type.
  /para
  para
 -If you want to see more details, you can look it up on
 -filenamemerkel:/org/ftp-debian-org;/testing/update_out//filename (or
 -in filenamemerkel:~aba/testing/update_out/filename to see a setup with
 -a smaller packages file).  Via web, it's at ulink
 +If you want to see more details, you can look it up on ulink
  url=http://ftp-master-host;/testing/update_out_code/;/ulink.
  /para
  para

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
  ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110329070955.ga14...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com



fakechroot bugginess on squeeze

2011-03-29 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
debootstrap --variant=fakechroot does not currently work on squeeze.
It fails with error messages like:

 W: Failure while unpacking required packages.  This will be attempted up to 
 five times.


These errors appear to be due to two distinct bugs: #561991 and #588508

Maybe a targeted patch of these two bugs in fakechroot is a good
candidate for the next point release of squeeze?

I'm attaching a debdiff against what is currently in stable (2.9-1.1).

i tested this as a non-privileged user on an i386 squeeze environment with:

mkdir root
PATH=/sbin:/usr/sbin:$PATH fakeroot \
  -i $(pwd)/fakeroot.state \
  -s $(pwd)/fakeroot.state \
  fakechroot \
debootstrap --variant=fakechroot squeeze root

Without these patches applied, the base fakechroot does not succeed.
With these patches applied, it completes successfully.

I also tried fixing only one bug or the other, but debootstrap failed to
complete without both fixes together, so i think they are both necessary.

I ran into these bugs while building debirf images.  It would be nice
for users of debian stable to not have to use a backported fakechroot
for debirf.

I do not believe these fixes have any adverse affect on other uses of
fakechroot.

Is there anything else you need from me in order to consider this
request for a future point release?

Regards,

--dkg

PS i am not subscribed to debian-release -- please CC me on replies.
thanks!
diff -u fakechroot-2.9/configure.ac fakechroot-2.9/configure.ac
--- fakechroot-2.9/configure.ac
+++ fakechroot-2.9/configure.ac
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@
 unlinkat \
 ulckpwdf \
 utime \
+utimensat \
 utimes \
 ])
 
diff -u fakechroot-2.9/config.h.in fakechroot-2.9/config.h.in
--- fakechroot-2.9/config.h.in
+++ fakechroot-2.9/config.h.in
@@ -368,6 +368,9 @@
 /* Define to 1 if you have the `utimes' function. */
 #undef HAVE_UTIMES
 
+/* Define to 1 if you have the `utimensat' function. */
+#undef HAVE_UTIMENSAT
+
 /* Define to 1 if you have the utime.h header file. */
 #undef HAVE_UTIME_H
 
diff -u fakechroot-2.9/configure fakechroot-2.9/configure
--- fakechroot-2.9/configure
+++ fakechroot-2.9/configure
@@ -12458,6 +12458,7 @@
 unlinkat \
 ulckpwdf \
 utime \
+utimensat \
 utimes \
 
 do :
diff -u fakechroot-2.9/src/libfakechroot.c fakechroot-2.9/src/libfakechroot.c
--- fakechroot-2.9/src/libfakechroot.c
+++ fakechroot-2.9/src/libfakechroot.c
@@ -543,6 +543,9 @@
 /* static int (*next_ulckpwdf) (void) = NULL; */
 #endif
 static int (*next_utime) (const char *filename, const struct utimbuf *buf) 
= NULL;
+#ifdef HAVE_UTIMENSAT
+static int (*next_utimensat) (int dirfd, const char *pathname, const 
struct timespec times[2], int flags) = NULL;
+#endif
 static int (*next_utimes) (const char *filename, const struct timeval 
tv[2]) = NULL;
 
 
@@ -821,6 +824,9 @@
 /*nextsym(ulckpwdf, ulckpwdf); */
 #endif
 nextsym(utime, utime);
+#ifdef HAVE_UTIMENSAT
+nextsym(utimensat, utimensat);
+#endif
 nextsym(utimes, utimes);
 }
 
@@ -896,10 +902,19 @@
 /* #include unistd.h */
 int __lxstat (int ver, const char *filename, struct stat *buf)
 {
-char *fakechroot_path, *fakechroot_ptr, fakechroot_buf[FAKECHROOT_MAXPATH];
+char *fakechroot_path, *fakechroot_ptr, 
fakechroot_buf[FAKECHROOT_MAXPATH], tmp[FAKECHROOT_MAXPATH];
+int retval;
+READLINK_TYPE_RETURN status;
+const char* orig;
+orig = filename;
 expand_chroot_path(filename, fakechroot_path, fakechroot_ptr, 
fakechroot_buf);
 if (next___lxstat == NULL) fakechroot_init();
-return next___lxstat(ver, filename, buf);
+retval = next___lxstat(ver, filename, buf);
+/* deal with http://bugs.debian.org/561991 */
+if ((buf-st_mode  S_IFMT) == S_IFLNK)
+  if ((status = readlink(orig, tmp, sizeof(tmp)-1)) != -1)
+buf-st_size = status;
+return retval;
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -909,10 +924,19 @@
 /* #include unistd.h */
 int __lxstat64 (int ver, const char *filename, struct stat64 *buf)
 {
-char *fakechroot_path, *fakechroot_ptr, fakechroot_buf[FAKECHROOT_MAXPATH];
+char *fakechroot_path, *fakechroot_ptr, 
fakechroot_buf[FAKECHROOT_MAXPATH], tmp[FAKECHROOT_MAXPATH];
+int retval;
+READLINK_TYPE_RETURN status;
+const char* orig;
+orig = filename;
 expand_chroot_path(filename, fakechroot_path, fakechroot_ptr, 
fakechroot_buf);
 if (next___lxstat64 == NULL) fakechroot_init();
-return next___lxstat64(ver, filename, buf);
+retval = next___lxstat64(ver, filename, buf);
+/* deal with http://bugs.debian.org/561991 */
+if ((buf-st_mode  S_IFMT) == S_IFLNK)
+  if ((status = readlink(orig, tmp, sizeof(tmp)-1)) != -1)
+buf-st_size = status;
+return retval;
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -2158,10 +2182,19 @@
 /* #include unistd.h */
 int lstat (const char *file_name, struct stat *buf)
 {
-char *fakechroot_path, *fakechroot_ptr, fakechroot_buf[FAKECHROOT_MAXPATH];
+char *fakechroot_path, *fakechroot_ptr, 
fakechroot_buf[FAKECHROOT_MAXPATH], tmp[FAKECHROOT_MAXPATH];
+

Bug#618871: transition: ocaml

2011-03-29 Thread Stéphane Glondu

Le 19/03/2011 08:40, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :

The Debian OCaml team is ready for a transition to OCaml 3.12.0. All
packages depending on ocaml-base-nox-3.11.2 and ocaml-base-3.11.2 will
be affected.

I am waiting for the approval from the release team to proceed.


Any news on that?


Cheers,

--
Stéphane



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d91df17.6060...@debian.org



Bug#618871: transition: ocaml

2011-03-29 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 15:31:03 +0200, Stéphane Glondu wrote:

 Le 19/03/2011 08:40, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
 The Debian OCaml team is ready for a transition to OCaml 3.12.0. All
 packages depending on ocaml-base-nox-3.11.2 and ocaml-base-3.11.2 will
 be affected.
 
 I am waiting for the approval from the release team to proceed.
 
 Any news on that?
 
Clearly not.

Cheers,
Julien



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110329175227.gk3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr



Tracking ghc transition on http://release.debian.org/transitions/

2011-03-29 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi release team,

the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look
useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance
instead of setting up the software ourself on alioth. Would that be
possible?

For the ghc transition, these settings should do, if I guess the syntax
correctly:

Affected: .build-depends ~ /ghc6?/ 
Good: .depends ~ /libghc-base-dev.*/ 
Bad: .depends ~ /libghc6-base-dev.*/ 

or even 

Affected: .build-depends ~ /ghc6?/ 
Good: .build-depends ~ /ghc/ 
Bad: .build-depends ~ /ghc6/ 


Thanks,
Joachim

-- 
Joachim nomeata Breitner
Debian Developer
  nome...@debian.org | ICQ# 74513189 | GPG-Keyid: 4743206C
  JID: nome...@joachim-breitner.de | http://people.debian.org/~nomeata


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Suggestion to include old firewire stack

2011-03-29 Thread Евгений Кабиольский
Hi
Is it able to include old firewire stack into next kernel release within
Squeeze distro? 
I have some troubles about my WD My Book and new firewire stack.
Troubles resolved in newer kernel (2.6.38). Old firewire implementation
is more stable, but was exluded from kernel. 

It would be more better to include old and new firewire modules in
squeeze kernel, but old modules would be black
-- 
Евгений Кабиольский
инженер ОГСТ
Южно-Уральский Государственный Университет
тел.:
(351) 267-93-60 (доб. 104)
e-mail:
evg...@urc.ac.ru



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1301426826.9370.17.camel@darkstar



Suggestion to include old firewire stack

2011-03-29 Thread Евгений Кабиольский
Hi
Is it able to include old firewire stack into next kernel release within
Squeeze distro? 
I have some troubles about my WD My Book and new firewire stack.
Troubles resolved in newer kernel (2.6.38). Old firewire implementation
is more stable, but was exluded from kernel. 

It would be more better to include old and new firewire modules in
squeeze kernel, but, for example, old modules would be blacklisted by
default.
-- 
Евгений Кабиольский
инженер ОГСТ
Южно-Уральский Государственный Университет
тел.:
(351) 267-93-60 (доб. 104)
e-mail:
evg...@urc.ac.ru


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1301426815.9370.15.camel@darkstar



Re: Bug#619990: developers-reference: Update of merkel.d.o URLs

2011-03-29 Thread Philipp Kern
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 09:09:55AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
 But I think it's not very important:
 - the former is web accessible at 
 http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_output/
 - the latter is probably not really the reference implementation of britney 
 anymore
   it can either be removed or replaced with 
   http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-release/britney1.git;a=summary and
   http://git.debian.org/?p=debian-release/britney2.git;a=summary

True.  I've still set up a sync between franck and ries now.  It should be
synced every two hours and after britney.

Kind regards
Philipp Kern


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Stable update of linux-2.6

2011-03-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
 There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (i.e.
 Debian 6.0.1) that should be fixed a.s.a.p:
[...]
 Either Dann or I will upload an update to stable-proposed-updates,
 intended for early release through stable-updates.

Unfortunately, the powerpc build reproducibly FTBFS:

  CC  arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o
/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-32-powerpc-emhBwA/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_powerpc_none/arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:
 In function 'default_machine_crash_shutdown':
/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-32-powerpc-emhBwA/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_powerpc_none/arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:448:
 error: implicit declaration of function 'crash_kexec_wait_realmode'
make[6]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o] Error 1
make[5]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
make[4]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
make[3]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-32-powerpc-emhBwA/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/build_powerpc_none_powerpc'
make[2]: *** [debian/stamps/build_powerpc_none_powerpc_plain] Error 2
make[1]: *** [build_powerpc_none_powerpc_real] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-32-powerpc-emhBwA/linux-2.6-2.6.32'
make: make[1]: Leaving directory 
`/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-32-powerpc-emhBwA/linux-2.6-2.6.32'
*** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1301437578.12508.562.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org



Re: [Pkg-openldap-devel] [SRM] (PRSC) Security fixes and possible database corruption

2011-03-29 Thread Moritz Mühlenhoff
Matthijs Möhlmann matth...@cacholong.nl schrieb:
 On Mar 28, 2011, at 11:36 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

 Hi,
 
 Thanks for working on fixing issues in stable.
 
 On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 22:41 +0200, Matthijs Möhlmann wrote:
 According to bug #617606 there are currently 2 CVE's open.
 CVE-2011-1024:
 [...]
 CVE-2011-1025:
 
 These look okay, although it doesn't appear that they've been resolved
 in unstable yet?  If so, that really should be done first.  Once the
 patches have been tested in unstable, we can then look again at applying
 them to stable.
 
 CVE-2011-1081:
 modrdn.c in slapd in OpenLDAP 2.4.x before 2.4.24 allows remote attackers 
 to cause a denial of service (daemon crash) via a relative Distinguished 
 Name (DN) modification request (aka MODRDN operation) that contains an 
 empty value for the OldDN field.
 Fix: 
 http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/servers/slapd/modrdn.c.diff?hideattic=1r1=texttr1=1.181r2=texttr2=1.182f=c
 Impact: High, possibility to remotely crash slapd.
 
 The security tracker indicates that this CVE hasn't yet been checked for
 its applicability to and impact on Debian.  Have you confirmed with the
 security team that they don't wish to handle this?
 

 No I havent confirmed with the security team. I'll file a ticket in their bug
 tracking and then they can decide what to do. As suggested by Michael Gilbert.

Please proceed with a stable point update.

Cheers,
Moritz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrnip4mli.dpd@inutil.org



Re: Stable update of linux-2.6

2011-03-29 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 23:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
 On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
  There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (i.e.
  Debian 6.0.1) that should be fixed a.s.a.p:
 [...]
  Either Dann or I will upload an update to stable-proposed-updates,
  intended for early release through stable-updates.
 
 Unfortunately, the powerpc build reproducibly FTBFS:

Introduced by:

commit 4d4d502715479044f02ae7464474bbb615b2d158
Author: Michael Neuling mi...@neuling.org
Date:   Thu May 13 19:40:11 2010 +

powerpc/kdump: Fix race in kdump shutdown

commit 60adec6226bbcf061d4c2d10944fced209d1847d upstream.

The new function crash_kexec_wait_realmode() is only defined if
CONFIG_SMP is defined, but is used unconditionally.

Of course, this was quickly fixed upstream:

commit c2be05481f6125254c45b78f334d4dd09c701c82
Author: Paul E. McKenney paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Date:   Tue Jun 15 14:48:39 2010 +

powerpc: Fix default_machine_crash_shutdown #ifdef botch

but that doesn't appear to have been sent to stable.

Ben.

   CC  arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o
 /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-32-powerpc-emhBwA/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_powerpc_none/arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:
  In function 'default_machine_crash_shutdown':
 /build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-32-powerpc-emhBwA/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/source_powerpc_none/arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.c:448:
  error: implicit declaration of function 'crash_kexec_wait_realmode'
 make[6]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel/crash.o] Error 1
 make[5]: *** [arch/powerpc/kernel] Error 2
 make[4]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
 make[3]: *** [all] Error 2
 make[3]: Leaving directory 
 `/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-32-powerpc-emhBwA/linux-2.6-2.6.32/debian/build/build_powerpc_none_powerpc'
 make[2]: *** [debian/stamps/build_powerpc_none_powerpc_plain] Error 2
 make[1]: *** [build_powerpc_none_powerpc_real] Error 2
 make[2]: Leaving directory 
 `/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-32-powerpc-emhBwA/linux-2.6-2.6.32'
 make: make[1]: Leaving directory 
 `/build/buildd-linux-2.6_2.6.32-32-powerpc-emhBwA/linux-2.6-2.6.32'
 *** [debian/stamps/build-base] Error 2
 dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2
 
 Regards,
 
 Adam
 
 

-- 
Ben Hutchings
Once a job is fouled up, anything done to improve it makes it worse.


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: Bug#619990: developers-reference: Update of merkel.d.o URLs

2011-03-29 Thread Charles Plessy
tag 619990 + patch
thanks

Le Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 09:09:55AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
 On Tue, 29 Mar 2011, Charles Plessy wrote:
   - For Britney, I do not find the equivalent on ries.d.o for the following:
 merkel:/org/ftp-debian-org;/testing/update_out/
 merkel:~aba/testing/update_out  Was it moved somewhere else ?
 
 hertzog@ries:~$ ls -al /srv/release.debian.org/www/britney
 ls: cannot access /srv/release.debian.org/www/britney: No such file or 
 directory

Hi Raphaël,

it seems that things changed overnight:

  plessy@ries:~$ ls -ald /srv/release.debian.org/www/britney
  drwxr-sr-x 5 release debian-release 4096 29 mars  10:20 
/srv/release.debian.org/www/britney

So finally the mirror link can be replaced.  I attached the patch, that focuses 
on
correcting the links after the move from merkel to ries.

The links to the Git repositories would be an interesting addition.  But I even
found a third one:

  http://git.debian.org/?p=tools-release/britney.git

If there is interest, I can extend the patch to include references to Git
repositories, but since I am not familiar with them, I would need guidance.

Cheers,

-- 
Charles Plessy
Debian Med packaging team,
http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-med
Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan
Index: pkgs.dbk
===
--- pkgs.dbk	(révision 8599)
+++ pkgs.dbk	(copie de travail)
@@ -2597,9 +2597,8 @@
 /para
 para
 If you want to see more details, you can look it up on
-filenamemerkel:/org/ftp-debian-org;/testing/update_out//filename (or
-in filenamemerkel:~aba/testing/update_out/filename to see a setup with
-a smaller packages file).  Via web, it's at ulink
+filenameries:/srv/release.debian.org/www/britney/update_output//filename.
+Via web, it's at ulink
 url=http://ftp-master-host;/testing/update_out_code/;/ulink.
 /para
 para
Index: resources.dbk
===
--- resources.dbk	(révision 8599)
+++ resources.dbk	(copie de travail)
@@ -260,9 +260,6 @@
 the Bug Tracking System (BTS).
 /para
 para
-It is restricted; a mirror is available on literalmerkel/literal.
-/para
-para
 If you plan on doing some statistical analysis or processing of Debian bugs,
 this would be the place to do it.  Please describe your plans on
 email-debian-devel; before implementing anything, however, to
@@ -278,7 +275,7 @@
 end up on this server, see xref linkend=upload/.
 /para
 para
-It is restricted; a mirror is available on literalmerkel/literal.
+It is restricted; a mirror is available on literalftp-master-mirror;/literal.
 /para
 para
 Problems with the Debian FTP archive generally need to be reported as bugs
Index: common.ent
===
--- common.ent	(révision 8599)
+++ common.ent	(copie de travail)
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 !ENTITY ftp-upload-host ftp.upload.debian.org
 !ENTITY ftp-eu-upload-host ftp.eu.upload.debian.org
 !ENTITY ssh-upload-host ssh.upload.debian.org
-!ENTITY ftp-master-mirror merkel.debian.org
+!ENTITY ftp-master-mirror ries.debian.org
 !ENTITY upload-queue /pub/UploadQueue/
 
 !ENTITY url-debian-policy http://www-debian-org;/doc/debian-policy/;


sh4 architecture into Wheezy

2011-03-29 Thread Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
Dear release team.

We(sh4 porting team) are now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU.
  http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstablea=sh4

We want to support sh4 by the next release (Wheezy).

- Buildd status
  Currentry, we are finished with build with packages of about 90%.
  http://buildd.debian-ports.org/stats/sh4.txt
  
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstablea=sh4priority=

- ArchiveQualification of sh4
  http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4

How do you think about including sh4 in the next release?

If I have say go ahead!, we will start work with DSA, buildd
team, security team and ftp-master team.

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro

-- 
Nobuhiro Iwamatsu
  iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org}
  GPG ID: 40AD1FA6


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Bug#619990: developers-reference: Update of merkel.d.o URLs

2011-03-29 Thread Raphael Hertzog
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Charles Plessy wrote:
 Hi Raphaël,
 
 it seems that things changed overnight:

Yes, see 20110329215524.ga21...@thrall.0x539.de by Phil Kern.

 The links to the Git repositories would be an interesting addition.  But I 
 even
 found a third one:
 
   http://git.debian.org/?p=tools-release/britney.git
 
 If there is interest, I can extend the patch to include references to Git
 repositories, but since I am not familiar with them, I would need guidance.

I don't think dev-ref is the place to document the Git repositories in use
by the release team, http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam would be
much more suited.

  If you want to see more details, you can look it up on
 -filenamemerkel:/org/ftp-debian-org;/testing/update_out//filename (or
 -in filenamemerkel:~aba/testing/update_out/filename to see a setup with
 -a smaller packages file).  Via web, it's at ulink
 +filenameries:/srv/release.debian.org/www/britney/update_output//filename.

Please use the web URL (http://ftp-master-host;/testing/update_out/),
it's much more stable  convenient than this path on a Debian machine.

 +Via web, it's at ulink
  url=http://ftp-master-host;/testing/update_out_code/;/ulink.

Please drop this link. It's really of no use to point people to
britney's code (note it's not the web version of the above link...).

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Follow my Debian News ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.com (English)
  ▶ http://RaphaelHertzog.fr (Français)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110330055539.gb20...@rivendell.home.ouaza.com