* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [2011-03-30 00:11:59]:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 23:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (i.e.
Debian 6.0.1) that should be fixed
Hello,
The version of gnotime currently available in the archive was built
against an older version of libgtkhml3.14, which makes it not
installable with the current (3.32.2-1) version of this library. Thus
I'm requesting a binNMU to fix this.
nmu gnotime_2.3.1~snapshot20091119-3 . ALL .
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:11 +0530, Kamalesh Babulal wrote:
* Ben Hutchings b...@decadent.org.uk [2011-03-30 00:11:59]:
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 23:26 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:19:08 +, Goedson Teixeira Paix�o wrote:
Hello,
The version of gnotime currently available in the archive was built
against an older version of libgtkhml3.14, which makes it not
installable with the current (3.32.2-1) version of this library. Thus
I'm
Le Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:55:39AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog a écrit :
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011, Charles Plessy wrote:
If you want to see more details, you can look it up on
-filenamemerkel:/org/ftp-debian-org;/testing/update_out//filename (or
-in filenamemerkel:~aba/testing/update_out/filename
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:05:52PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Dear release team.
We(sh4 porting team) are now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU.
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstablea=sh4
We want to support sh4 by the next release (Wheezy).
-
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 01:26:55 +0600, Евгений Кабиольский wrote:
Hi
Is it able to include old firewire stack into next kernel release within
Squeeze distro?
I don't think so.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 13:54 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
fcgiwrap doesn't stop properly on squeeze (#602199). I just uploaded 1.0.3-2
with Jordi's fixes that were pending since four months to unstable.
I'd like to propose the attached fix for squeeze, too.
+fcgiwrap (1.0-1+squeeze1) stable;
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 13:54:10 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Version:
fcgiwrap doesn't stop properly on squeeze (#602199). I just uploaded 1.0.3-2
with Jordi's fixes that were pending since four months
On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:40:26PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
I would like to register an interest in carrying out a perl transition
soon. This would be to perl 5.10.1 to 5.12.x (x = 3 currently). This
transition has already been in preparation for some time, and I think
we are in a good
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 15:42:56 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (30/03/2011):
One thing that came up is that we need to make sure all sid buildd
chroots have debconf-english installed and not debconf-i18n before
that happens (debconf-i18n depends on
On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 04:00 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
debootstrap --variant=fakechroot does not currently work on squeeze.
It fails with error messages like:
W: Failure while unpacking required packages. This will be attempted up to
five times.
These errors appear to be due
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org (30/03/2011):
One thing that came up is that we need to make sure all sid buildd
chroots have debconf-english installed and not debconf-i18n before
that happens (debconf-i18n depends on liblocale-gettext-perl, which
depends on perlapi-5.10.0). Cc:-ing
Processing changes file: gdm3_2.30.5-6squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gdm3_2.30.5-6squeeze2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gdm3_2.30.5-6squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: gdm3_2.30.5-6squeeze2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes
FYI: I plan to upload python-sphinx, python-defaults (without Python
2.5, with Python 2.7) and python3-defaults (with Python 3.2 instead of
Python 3.2) tomorrow. Please report bug against tech-ctte and CC me if
you think it's not a good idea.
--
Piotr Ożarowski Debian
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:02:56 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
FYI: I plan to upload python-sphinx, python-defaults (without Python
2.5, with Python 2.7) and python3-defaults (with Python 3.2 instead of
Python 3.2) tomorrow. Please report bug against tech-ctte and CC me if
you think it's not
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 12:19 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
nmu qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1 . alpha amd64 sparc64 . -m Package rebuild.
(Closes: #619096).
sparc64 isn't an official Debian architecture, so we can't schedule
binNMUs there; you'd need to talk to the port maintainers.
The +b1 binNMUs
[Julien Cristau, 2011-03-30]
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 16:02:56 +0200, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
FYI: I plan to upload python-sphinx, python-defaults (without Python
2.5, with Python 2.7) and python3-defaults (with Python 3.2 instead of
Python 3.2) tomorrow. Please report bug against tech-ctte
(Please keep me in Cc, I'm not subscribed)
Proposer: Tollef Fog Heen tfh...@debian.org
Seconder: Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org
Currently, /lib/init/rw exists as a place for applications that need
write access early (before $local_fs) to put their data. In addition,
some abuse /dev/shm for
On 03/30/2011 09:50 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead, with the exception of doing s/unstable/stable/ in the
changelog stanza. :-)
OK, i've uploaded, with a correct changelog. Thanks for noticing that!
Please let me know if there's anything else that i need to do; i've
never put a
Hi,
the plans of the GNOME team for GNOME 3 are not entirely complete yet.
However there are a number of transitions coming up that you should be
aware of.
Currently, there is a gobject-introspection transition going on, and the
gtk+2.0 / gdk-pixbuf split. These are both prerequisites for
On 11-03-30 09:17 AM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:05:52PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Dear release team.
We(sh4 porting team) are now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU.
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstablea=sh4
We want to
On Wed, 30, Mar, 2011 at 12:02:44PM -0400, Bill Traynor spoke thus..
Not sure why STMs activities are relevant? Renesas owns the IP and is
moving forward with SH4-based cores.
Another question which has been brought up relates to buildds. What
number of buildds is it estimated would be
Hi
Below an update of the release goals I advocated and some thoughts on
others.
Release Goals
-
As a first step towards establishing release goals for wheezy, we will
be reviewing
each of the goals which we had for squeeze [RDO:SGoals] to see which
have been achieved and which
Le mercredi 30 mars 2011 à 19:21 +0200, Luk Claes a écrit :
# remove obsolete libraries
Advocate: Barry deFreese and Luk Claes
State: confirmed
Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/RemoveOldLibs
This worked quite well and should continue so we can get rid of obsolete
libraries
Hi all,
[...]
# package quality
Advocate: Holger Levsen and Luk Claes
State: confirmed
Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/PackagesQuality
This is a never ending goal of sustaining our packages quality by
improving our tests and following up closely... so needless to say that
On 03/30/2011 07:11 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2011-03-28 at 12:19 -0700, Ludovico Cavedon wrote:
nmu qscintilla2_2.4.3-1+b1 . alpha amd64 sparc64 . -m Package rebuild.
(Closes: #619096).
sparc64 isn't an official Debian architecture, so we can't schedule
binNMUs there; you'd need
Am 30.03.2011 19:21, schrieb Luk Claes:
Regarding reliability I'm doing some work regarding NFS, though one of
the main outstanding issues is the race between availability of the
network devices and the end of the network init script AFAICS. It would
also not be a bad idea to have a discussion
On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
- ArchiveQualification of sh4
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
How do you think about including sh4 in the next release?
Toolchain was supported by CodeSourcery
so it's not supported anymore? If this is correct, then this is a
On 11-03-30 02:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
- ArchiveQualification of sh4
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
How do you think about including sh4 in the next release?
Toolchain was supported by CodeSourcery
so it's not supported
On 30.03.2011 21:17, Bill Traynor wrote:
On 11-03-30 02:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
- ArchiveQualification of sh4
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
How do you think about including sh4 in the next release?
Toolchain was
[Piotr Ożarowski, 2011-03-30]
FYI: I plan to upload python-sphinx, python-defaults (without Python
2.5, with Python 2.7) and python3-defaults (with Python 3.2 instead of
Python 3.2) tomorrow. Please report bug against tech-ctte and CC me if
you think it's not a good idea.
I know I shouldn't
On 11-03-30 03:48 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.03.2011 21:17, Bill Traynor wrote:
On 11-03-30 02:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
- ArchiveQualification of sh4
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
How do you think about including
Le 29/03/2011 19:52, Julien Cristau a écrit :
The Debian OCaml team is ready for a transition to OCaml 3.12.0. All
packages depending on ocaml-base-nox-3.11.2 and ocaml-base-3.11.2 will
be affected.
I am waiting for the approval from the release team to proceed.
Any news on that?
Clearly
Hi,
2011/3/31 Matthias Klose d...@debian.org:
On 30.03.2011 21:17, Bill Traynor wrote:
On 11-03-30 02:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
- ArchiveQualification of sh4
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
How do you think about including
Hi,
2011/3/30 Steve McIntyre st...@einval.com:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 02:05:52PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
Dear release team.
We(sh4 porting team) are now trying to run Debian on Renesas SH(sh4) CPU.
http://buildd.debian-ports.org/status/architecture.php?suite=unstablea=sh4
We want to
Hi,
2011/3/31 Mark Hymers m...@debian.org:
On Wed, 30, Mar, 2011 at 12:02:44PM -0400, Bill Traynor spoke thus..
Not sure why STMs activities are relevant? Renesas owns the IP and is
moving forward with SH4-based cores.
Another question which has been brought up relates to buildds. What
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 21:48 +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.03.2011 21:17, Bill Traynor wrote:
On 11-03-30 02:36 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 30.03.2011 07:05, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote:
- ArchiveQualification of sh4
http://wiki.debian.org/ArchiveQualification/sh4
How do you think
38 matches
Mail list logo
