Quoting Christian PERRIER (bubu...@debian.org):
By the way, should I have used the BTS for this request? I became used
to it during the freeze but went back to old-style requests with that
one.
I finally settled to use the BTS. Please bash (or dash) me if that's
not wished..:-)
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
(I sent the same request manually on March 19th. However, after more
thinking, I think that using a bug report makes it easier for the
release team to track things. No intent from me to put
[Please keep Raúl, Mark and myself CCed on all replies]
Dear Stable Release Managers,
I'm a co-maintainer of KVIrc and upstream has just released a bugfix release for
their stable branch (4.0). Debian Stable has 4.0.2 but 4.0.4 fixes some serious
problems:
CRASH r4795 fix for a crash when opening
[ Bcc: -release to keep track of the actual proposals ]
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 07:21:08PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
# package quality
Advocate: Holger Levsen and Luk Claes
State: confirmed
Wiki: http://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/PackagesQuality
This is a never ending goal of
Hi,
On Thu, March 31, 2011 10:54, you wrote:
I'm a co-maintainer of KVIrc and upstream has just released a bugfix
release for their stable branch (4.0). Debian Stable has 4.0.2 but
4.0.4 fixes some serious problems:
CRASH r4795 fix for a crash when opening join channels widget
CRASH #878
On jeu., 2011-03-31 at 14:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Xfce 4.8 (for the most part) doesn't rely on hal anymore, at least on Linux.
Yves-Alexis, what is the fallback on kfreebsd? Does Xfce 4.8 on kfreebsd still
require hal or will it just have reduced functionality?
On BSD it's reduced
Am 31.03.2011 14:35, schrieb Yves-Alexis Perez:
On jeu., 2011-03-31 at 14:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Xfce 4.8 (for the most part) doesn't rely on hal anymore, at least on Linux.
Yves-Alexis, what is the fallback on kfreebsd? Does Xfce 4.8 on kfreebsd
still
require hal or will it just
Hi,
please add a hint for enet and irrlicht:
easy enet/1.3.1-2 irrlicht/1.7.2+dfsg1-1 sandboxgamemaker/2.6.1+dfsg-5
blockattack/1.4.1+ds1-2 supertuxkart/0.7+dfsg1-2
Regards,
Ansgar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
[Please CC Raúl. Mark and myself on all replies.]
Dear Adam,
Raúl Sánchez Siles schrieb am 31.03.2011 15:13:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:29:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Thu, March 31, 2011 10:54, Kai Wasserbäch wrote:
REGR #1068 Perl was updated to 5.12.2 +latest Kvirc (SVN)
[...]
Hi Adam,
Thanks for taking the time to tackle this.
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:29:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, March 31, 2011 10:54, you wrote:
I'm a co-maintainer of KVIrc and upstream has just released a bugfix
release for their stable branch (4.0). Debian Stable
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 15:06:26 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Hi,
please add a hint for enet and irrlicht:
easy enet/1.3.1-2 irrlicht/1.7.2+dfsg1-1 sandboxgamemaker/2.6.1+dfsg-5
blockattack/1.4.1+ds1-2 supertuxkart/0.7+dfsg1-2
Doesn't work right now because supertuxkart/mips
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 23:57:19 +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi release team,
the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look
useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance
instead of setting up the software ourself on alioth. Would that be
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 15:06:26 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
please add a hint for enet and irrlicht:
easy enet/1.3.1-2 irrlicht/1.7.2+dfsg1-1 sandboxgamemaker/2.6.1+dfsg-5
blockattack/1.4.1+ds1-2 supertuxkart/0.7+dfsg1-2
Doesn't work right
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 16:04:04 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 15:06:26 +0200, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
please add a hint for enet and irrlicht:
easy enet/1.3.1-2 irrlicht/1.7.2+dfsg1-1 sandboxgamemaker/2.6.1+dfsg-5
Hi.
krb5 changed sonames and libauthen-krb5-admin-perl needs to be rebuilt.
My test shows that a binnmu should do the trick.
Thanks,
--Sam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org writes:
krb5 changed sonames and libauthen-krb5-admin-perl needs to be rebuilt.
My test shows that a binnmu should do the trick.
I was going to refresh the packaging on that anyway. I'll do that right
now and upload a new package to unstable, so don't worry
On Thu, 2011-03-31 at 15:13 +0200, Raúl Sánchez Siles wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 01:29:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
- KviEngineListBoxItem::KviEngineListBoxItem(KviTalListWidget *
lb,KviCryptEngineDescription * d,const char * modName)
- :
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
package tortoisehg
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of 'tortoisehg'
Limit currently set to 'package':'tortoisehg'
tags 620217 - upstream
Bug #620217 [tortoisehg] tortoisehg crash on load since version 2.0.2
Removed
Russ Allbery r...@debian.org writes:
Sam Hartman hartm...@debian.org writes:
krb5 changed sonames and libauthen-krb5-admin-perl needs to be rebuilt.
My test shows that a binnmu should do the trick.
I was going to refresh the packaging on that anyway. I'll do that right
now and upload a new
Hi Julien,
Am Donnerstag, den 31.03.2011, 16:06 +0200 schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 23:57:19 +0530, Joachim Breitner wrote:
the transitions monitors on http://release.debian.org/transitions/ look
useful, and I guess it makes more sense to use an existing instance
instead
Le 31/03/2011 20:35, Joachim Breitner a écrit :
I’m surprised by the dependency level calculation – haskell-transformers
should be on one level with -deepseq. But maybe that calculation is
confused as the binary package names are changing during the transition.
The code assumes (among other
Your message dated Fri, 1 Apr 2011 00:30:25 +0200
with message-id 20110331223025.gd3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
and subject line Re: Bug#618403: VTK 5.6 transition
has caused the Debian Bug report #618403,
regarding VTK 5.6 transition
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
We've fixed the powerpc FTBFS, an XFS regression and a few other
issues, so I'll plan to upload -33 tomorrow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
23 matches
Mail list logo
