Bug#614726: FFmpeg 0.6 transition
On Sun, Feb 6, 2011 at 14:29:33 +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote: Hi, First of all, congratulations on the release! FYI: I just accepted mehdis offer from debconf 10 to upload ffmpeg just after the squeeze release. I've got a lot of pings and flames that this wasn't included in squeeze, we discussed this to death in NYC, and therefore just went ahead. Reverse-dependencies of libavutil49 left in testing at this point: - audacious-plugins/mips (stuck behind a libmowgli SONAME bump) - mlt (bumped SONAME twice since the release) - mrpt (g++ goes out of virtual memory on s390) Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401070238.ge3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
Odd britney output for grub2
Hi, I can't see why I'm getting the following grep-excuses output for grub2: grub2 (1.98+20100804-14 to 1.99~rc1-8) Maintainer: GRUB Maintainers Too young, only 2 of 10 days old grub-efi-amd64/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: efibootmgr grub-efi-ia32/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: efibootmgr grub-efi-ia32/kfreebsd-i386 unsatisfiable Depends: efibootmgr grub-common (i386, amd64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mipsel, powerpc, sparc) has new bugs! Updating grub-common introduces new bugs: #612128 Updating grub-pc fixes old bugs: #590884, #593648 Updating grub-ieee1275 fixes old bugs: #560823 Not considered #612128 was fixed in 1.99~rc1-7, and the BTS seems to agree. What am I missing? (I notice that the version graph on http://bugs.debian.org/612128 seems to be out of date, though. Maybe the BTS job that pulls data from the archive is broken, although it's a while since I touched any of this stuff ...) Thanks, -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401093252.gj31...@riva.ucam.org
Bug#619117: perl 5.12 transition
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 03:34:17PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 07:40:26PM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: I would like to register an interest in carrying out a perl transition soon. This would be to perl 5.10.1 to 5.12.x (x = 3 currently). This transition has already been in preparation for some time, and I think we are in a good position to schedule this now. This is the first major transition I've been involved in (I've recently become a co-maintainer of the perl package), so please bear with me if I miss anything out. You can see the transition tracking bugs at [1]. One thing that came up is that we need to make sure all sid buildd chroots have debconf-english installed and not debconf-i18n before that happens (debconf-i18n depends on liblocale-gettext-perl, which depends on perlapi-5.10.0). Cc:-ing debian-wb-team so this can be handled before the perl transition. Done for the sid chroots of the kfreebsd build daemons. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401085619.ga25...@hall.aurel32.net
Re: Odd britney output for grub2
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:32:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: I can't see why I'm getting the following grep-excuses output for grub2: grub2 (1.98+20100804-14 to 1.99~rc1-8) Maintainer: GRUB Maintainers Too young, only 2 of 10 days old grub-efi-amd64/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: efibootmgr grub-efi-ia32/kfreebsd-amd64 unsatisfiable Depends: efibootmgr grub-efi-ia32/kfreebsd-i386 unsatisfiable Depends: efibootmgr grub-common (i386, amd64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mipsel, powerpc, sparc) has new bugs! Updating grub-common introduces new bugs: #612128 Updating grub-pc fixes old bugs: #590884, #593648 Updating grub-ieee1275 fixes old bugs: #560823 Not considered #612128 was fixed in 1.99~rc1-7, and the BTS seems to agree. What am I missing? http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/britney/unstable-nr disagrees, which is what we check. (I notice that the version graph on http://bugs.debian.org/612128 seems to be out of date, though. Maybe the BTS job that pulls data from the archive is broken, although it's a while since I touched any of this stuff ...) Yeah, given that the version graph disagrees with found/fixed I guess you should talk with Don. ;-) Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: oldstable-security signing key
On Sat, 26, Mar, 2011 at 09:02:46AM +, Mark Hymers spoke thus.. If anyone has any objections to this, can they let us know? I intend to implement the changes necessary to make this work in dak immediately, but won't change the key over for a couple of days to give people time to raise objections. Hi, This has now been done. Mark -- Mark Hymers mhy at debian dot org Don't you hate those Claims Direct adverts? 'I slipped on a banana skin and sued the Dominican Republic!' Linda Smith on the News Quiz talking about the Compensation Culture -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401125050.ga19...@hymers.org.uk
Re: Suggested release goal: /run
Le 30/03/2011 17:24, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit : (Please keep me in Cc, I'm not subscribed) [...] - /run should exist as a tmpfs - /var/run should be a symlink or bind mount of/to /run - /var/lock should be a symlink/bind mount to /run/lock - /lib/init/rw should be a symlink/bind mount to /run - applications are free to use /run as they have previously used /var/run. Applications using /lib/init/rw and /dev/shm are to be changed to use /run. Is there some generic location planned for (non priviledged) users? Currently, /tmp is used for that, but since we are talking about making clean stuff... Cheers, -- Stéphane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4d95d410.1080...@debian.org
Re: Suggested release goal: /run
Am 01.04.2011 15:33, schrieb Stéphane Glondu: Le 30/03/2011 17:24, Tollef Fog Heen a écrit : (Please keep me in Cc, I'm not subscribed) [...] - /run should exist as a tmpfs - /var/run should be a symlink or bind mount of/to /run - /var/lock should be a symlink/bind mount to /run/lock - /lib/init/rw should be a symlink/bind mount to /run - applications are free to use /run as they have previously used /var/run. Applications using /lib/init/rw and /dev/shm are to be changed to use /run. Is there some generic location planned for (non priviledged) users? Currently, /tmp is used for that, but since we are talking about making clean stuff... Yes. See the discussion/documentation around XDG_RUNTIME_DIR [1]. If you are using systemd/pam_systemd this already works today. The directory /run/user/username will be created on login via the pam module, be 700, and the XDG_RUNTIME_DIR variable will be exported in your environment pointing to that directory. I think pam_systemd should be usable on a non-systemd system too (untested). HTH, Michael [1] http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/basedir-spec-latest.html -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Odd britney output for grub2
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 12:35:31 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 10:32:52AM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: [...] grub-common (i386, amd64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mipsel, powerpc, sparc) has new bugs! Updating grub-common introduces new bugs: #612128 Updating grub-pc fixes old bugs: #590884, #593648 Updating grub-ieee1275 fixes old bugs: #560823 Not considered #612128 was fixed in 1.99~rc1-7, and the BTS seems to agree. What am I missing? http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/britney/unstable-nr disagrees, which is what we check. (I notice that the version graph on http://bugs.debian.org/612128 seems to be out of date, though. Maybe the BTS job that pulls data from the archive is broken, although it's a while since I touched any of this stuff ...) Yeah, given that the version graph disagrees with found/fixed I guess you should talk with Don. ;-) Colin fixed the problem on busoni, so this is fixed as of the 18:00 UTC cron run. jcristau@busoni:~$ grep -c grub-common /org/bugs.debian.org/bugscan/britney/unstable-nr 0 jcristau@busoni:~$ Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110401183051.gk3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
NEW changes in proposedupdates
Processing changes file: fakechroot_2.9-1.1+squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze1_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze1_ia64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze1_kfreebsd-amd64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze1_kfreebsd-i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze1_mipsel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze1_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze1_s390.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: bind9_9.7.3.dfsg-1~squeeze1_sparc.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1q5krp-0002ey...@franck.debian.org
Re: fakechroot bugginess on squeeze
On Wed, March 30, 2011 16:47, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: On 03/30/2011 09:50 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Please go ahead, with the exception of doing s/unstable/stable/ in the changelog stanza. :-) OK, i've uploaded, with a correct changelog. Thanks for noticing that! Please let me know if there's anything else that i need to do; i've never put a package into a point release before. It all looks good; thanks. I flagged the package for acceptance in to p-u earlier this evening, and it's already built on most architectures. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/8971d4b5c60dc75bd97171f4775b5ba0.squir...@adsl.funky-badger.org
invitation : meeting d'affaire
Rencontrer d'autres chefs d'entreprises Prospectez de nouvelles opportunités d'affaires ! L'association « Le Maroc Positif » vous invite à la 1ere Rencontre des chefs d'entreprises (200 décideurs sont invités) pour échanger directement entre eux leurs besoins et leurs offres ; ceci le 14 Avril au Centre d'Accueil et de Conférence (CAC) de Hay Riad Rabat à 15H30. Frais de Participation : 300dhs. Cette rencontre est une occasion à ne pas rater pour : · Rencontrer d'autres chefs d'entreprises et développer votre relationnel ; · Présenter votre entreprise et vos offres aux chefs d'entreprises participants ; · S'informer sur leurs besoins liés à votre secteur d'activité ; · S'informer aussi sur les différentes promotions proposées par les autres participants.. Bref, c'est votre rendez-vous mensuel, à marquer sur votre agenda, pour renforcer l'image de votre Sté et de développer vos affaires. http://www.exit.ma/14avril http://www.facebook.com/event.php?eid=214513301897801 Contact: Said ETEBBAI : 0671 20 40 91 Président de l'Association : Abdelhafid FAHMI au 0669146969 Responsable de programmation : Brahim Laaouina au 0661390064
