Re: Hinting that eet and eina should migrate together to testing

2011-04-22 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 04/22/2011 12:22 AM, Mark-Willem Jansen wrote: While waiting for the EFL's to go into testing, I see that eina and eet are holding everything up. Eina and eet both have a version in testing. Only the name of one of the packages related to the eina source will change, namely libeina-svn-06

RE: Hinting that eet and eina should migrate together to testing

2011-04-22 Thread Mark-Willem Jansen
Thanks for the info. Just let me know if I can help with the transition. Regards, Mark-Willem Jansen Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 09:37:54 +0200 From: me...@dogguy.org To: markwil...@hotmail.com CC: debian-release@lists.debian.org Subject: Re: Hinting

Re: Hinting that eet and eina should migrate together to testing

2011-04-22 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 09:37:54 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: This transition is tracked on: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/eina.html AFAICS, there are still 4 packages to update to get this transtition done. None of those 4 packages are in testing at this point though.

Re: Hinting that eet and eina should migrate together to testing

2011-04-22 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 22/04/2011 13:24, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 09:37:54 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: This transition is tracked on: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/eina.html AFAICS, there are still 4 packages to update to get this transtition done. None of those 4

Re: Hinting that eet and eina should migrate together to testing

2011-04-22 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 22/04/2011 13:24, Julien Cristau wrote: On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 09:37:54 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: This transition is tracked on: http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/eina.html AFAICS, there are still 4 packages to update to get this transtition done. None of those 4

Re: Bug#622817: perl: CVE-2011-1487: taint laundering in lc, uc

2011-04-22 Thread Dominic Hargreaves
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 08:52:31AM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: severity 622817 important thanks On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 04:18:36PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: * Niko Tyni: Security team, I assume this is going to be fixed through a DSA? I don't think this is a security bug on its

Bug#623719: nmu: Please bin nmu the following for a SONAME bump of libmuparser

2011-04-22 Thread Scott Howard
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu libgetfem4++_4.1.1-2 . ALL . -m Build against new libmuparser0debian1 nmu meshlab_1.3.0a+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m Build against new libmuparser0debian1 nmu ovito_0.9.2-1 . ALL . -m Build

Bug#623719: nmu: Please bin nmu the following for a SONAME bump of libmuparser

2011-04-22 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags 623719 = transition thanks Turning this bugreport into a transition bug, to keep it under someone's radar. On 07/03/2011 11:49, Scott Howard wrote: nmu libgetfem4++_4.1.1-2 . ALL . -m Build against new libmuparser0debian1 nmu

Processed: retitle 623719 to transition: muparser

2011-04-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: retitle 623719 transition: muparser Bug #623719 [release.debian.org] nmu: Please bin nmu the following for a SONAME bump of libmuparser Changed Bug title to 'transition: muparser' from 'nmu: Please bin nmu the following for a SONAME bump of

Processed: tagging 623719

2011-04-22 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 623719 + pending Bug #623719 [release.debian.org] transition: muparser Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 623719: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=623719

Re: [SRM] New upstream stable release for gdm3

2011-04-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 00:32 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : I’ll just wait a few days for my urge to strangle kittens named after the libtool developers to pass, and integrate just the following patches:

Re: [SRM] New upstream stable release for gdm3

2011-04-22 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Fri, 2011-04-22 at 20:09 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: Le mercredi 20 avril 2011 à 00:32 +0200, Josselin Mouette a écrit : I’ll just wait a few days for my urge to strangle kittens named after the libtool developers to pass, and integrate just the following patches:

NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-04-22 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: gdm3_2.30.5-6squeeze3_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1qdmrs-yw...@franck.debian.org