Your message dated Tue, 07 Jun 2011 08:30:25 +0200
with message-id 4dedc581.6060...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#620975: transition: python-apt
has caused the Debian Bug report #620975,
regarding transition: python-apt
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On 06/07/2011 01:33 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
Matthias Klose wrote:
On 06/07/2011 01:03 AM, Yavor Doganov wrote:
We would like to carry out a GNUstep transition
(libgnustep-base1.20-1.22; libgnustep-gui0.18-0.20) *and*
libobjc2-3, ideally coinciding with the migration of gcc-defaults to
On 06/06/2011 23:22, Joachim Breitner wrote:
highlighting-kate is one of the big beasts that tend to fail on weaker
arches; on some of them it works with some buildds and not others.
Should I
* give back the package once or twice to find out if there is a strong
buildd or
* should I
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear ftp-masters,
in order to get Haskell to migrate to testing, we need to remove some
binary from unstable. In this case, pandoc has built earlier on these
arches. But then a new build-dependency was
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again,
similar to the pandoc/highlighting-kate situation, we have this with
haskell-pretty-show and haskell-lexer. Please remove the outdated
binaries of haskell-pretty-show to allow for the Haskell
Hi Mehdi,
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 14:17 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
On 06/06/2011 23:22, Joachim Breitner wrote:
highlighting-kate is one of the big beasts that tend to fail on weaker
arches; on some of them it works with some buildds and not others.
Should I
* give back the
On 07/06/2011 18:14, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 14:17 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
pandoc is not migratable in its current state in sid. And, gitit depends
on pandoc. I tried to remove both gigit and pandoc from testing during my
tests to see if ghc could migrate, but
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 18:24 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
On 07/06/2011 18:14, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 14:17 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
pandoc is not migratable in its current state in sid. And, gitit depends
on pandoc. I tried to remove both gigit
On 07/06/2011 18:44, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 18:24 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
On 07/06/2011 18:14, Joachim Breitner wrote:
Am Dienstag, den 07.06.2011, 14:17 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
pandoc is not migratable in its current state in sid. And, gitit
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 18:24:16 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 07/06/2011 18:14, Joachim Breitner wrote:
BTW, is it a problem to have the dummy packages from haskell-dummy,
which are arch all, depend on their libghc-*-dev counterpart even
though
it might not exist on all arches? Or is britney
On 06/07/2011 08:23 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
Hi,
We're trying to migrate to swt-gtk 3.6.1, and have updated all
dependant packages in unstable. However, it seems the migration is
stalled, probably because the binary packages have changed name. My
guess is that it needs some intervention to cause
On 07/06/11 19:52, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 06/07/2011 08:23 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
Hi,
We're trying to migrate to swt-gtk 3.6.1, and have updated all
dependant packages in unstable. However, it seems the migration is
stalled, probably because the binary packages have changed name. My
guess
Processing changes file: libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-2+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-2+squeeze1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml2_2.7.8.dfsg-2+squeeze1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: libxml2_2.6.32.dfsg-5+lenny4_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml2_2.6.32.dfsg-5+lenny4_alpha.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml2_2.6.32.dfsg-5+lenny4_arm.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libxml2_2.6.32.dfsg-5+lenny4_armel.changes
14 matches
Mail list logo
