NEW changes in proposedupdates

2011-11-01 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: tzdata_2011n-0squeeze1_amd64.changes ACCEPT -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1rl9ct-g8...@franck.debian.org

Bug#637809: transition: perl 5.14

2011-11-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 22:24:05 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 06:49:02PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: After a few months of rebuild testing and bug filing, perl 5.14 packages are getting into shape and are nearly ready to transition into unstable. Hi

Bug#637809: transition: perl 5.14

2011-11-01 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 11/01/2011 11:51 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 22:24:05 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 06:49:02PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: After a few months of rebuild testing and bug filing, perl 5.14 packages are getting into shape and are nearly

Bug#636682: marked as done (transition: fluidsynth)

2011-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2011 12:08:16 +0100 with message-id 4eafd320.10...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#636682: transition: fluidsynth has caused the Debian Bug report #636682, regarding transition: fluidsynth to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#637809: transition: perl 5.14

2011-11-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 11:55:39 +0100, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 11/01/2011 11:51 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 22:24:05 +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 06:49:02PM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: After a few months of rebuild testing and bug

Processed: block 645105 with 631019

2011-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: block 645105 with 631019 Bug #645105 [release.debian.org] transition: gdal Was not blocked by any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 645105: 631019 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 645105:

Bug#630201: marked as done (transition: liblzma 5)

2011-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:11:18 +0100 with message-id 4eafe1e6.8080...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#630201: transition: liblzma 5 has caused the Debian Bug report #630201, regarding transition: liblzma 5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#633304: transition: ocaml

2011-11-01 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
tags 633304 + pending thanks On 07/09/2011 01:35 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote: OCaml 3.12.1 has been recently released. It is mostly bugfixes. I've rebuilt all packages that depend on ocaml, and I see no blocker to update it in Debian. I've planified the migration at [1] (I am planning to

Processed: Re: Bug#633304: transition: ocaml

2011-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 633304 + pending Bug #633304 [release.debian.org] transition: ocaml 3.12.1 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 633304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633304

Bug#638818: marked as done (transition: botan1.8)

2011-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 01 Nov 2011 13:08:40 +0100 with message-id 4eafe148.3090...@dogguy.org and subject line Re: Bug#638818: transition: botan1.8 has caused the Debian Bug report #638818, regarding transition: botan1.8 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#630201: transition: liblzma 5

2011-11-01 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
reopen 630201 thanks On 11/01/2011 01:11 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: xz-utils | 5.1.1alpha+20110809-3 | testing | source, amd64, armel, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc oh, I forgot that liblzma2 is _still_ in testing (thanks to julien for

Processed: Re: Bug#630201: transition: liblzma 5

2011-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: reopen 630201 Bug #630201 {Done: Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org} [release.debian.org] transition: liblzma 5 thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 630201:

Processed: tagging 630201

2011-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 630201 + pending Bug #630201 [release.debian.org] transition: liblzma 5 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 630201: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=630201

Re: Please binNMU fluxbox

2011-11-01 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 10/31/2011 02:09 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: Hello, During my upload of fluxbox 1.3.2, I accidentally built the amd64 .deb that was uploaded to ftp-master on Ubuntu, not Debian. In order to prevent any issues regarding versioned libraries, as well as fix the themes that are shipped

Bug#640977: marked as done (nmu: gofigure2_0.8.2-1)

2011-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:30:26 +0100 with message-id 2001153026.gx3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#640977: nmu: gofigure2_0.8.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #640977, regarding nmu: gofigure2_0.8.2-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that

Bug#646254: libhangul transition binnmu

2011-11-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 03:00:10 +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal 5 packages need binNMUs for libhangul 0.1.0 transition: nmu imhangul_2.0.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libhangul

Bug#646254: libhangul transition binnmu

2011-11-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 03:00:10 +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote: nmu imhangul_2.0.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libhangul 0.1.0-1 nmu imhangul3_3.0.0-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libhangul 0.1.0-1 nmu nabi_0.99.9-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libhangul 0.1.0-1 nmu ibus-hangul_1.3.1-3 . ALL . -m

Bug#646340: nmu: yiff_2.14.5-7

2011-11-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 14:43:18 +0200, Luca Falavigna wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu yiff_2.14.5-7 . ALL . -m Restore liby-dev binary package Rationale: a recent bison upload [0] incorrectly

Processed: user release.debian....@packages.debian.org, usertagging 646254, usertagging 646254 ...

2011-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was jcris...@debian.org). usertags 646254 - binnmu Bug#646254: libhangul transition binnmu Usertags were: binnmu. Usertags are now: . usertags

Bug#646762: marked as done (nmu: libwx-perl_1:0.9902-1)

2011-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2011 16:46:21 +0100 with message-id 2001154621.gb3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr and subject line Re: Bug#646762: nmu: libwx-perl_1:0.9902-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #646762, regarding nmu: libwx-perl_1:0.9902-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#646254: libhangul transition binnmu

2011-11-01 Thread Changwoo Ryu
2011-11-01 (화), 16:35 +0100, Julien Cristau: On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 03:00:10 +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote: Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu Severity: normal 5 packages need binNMUs for libhangul 0.1.0 transition: nmu

Bug#647303: nmu: libtasn1-3_2.10-1

2011-11-01 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2011-11-01 Jakub Wilk jw...@debian.org wrote: * Andreas Metzler ametz...@downhill.at.eu.org, 2011-11-01, 19:28: nmu libtasn1-3_2.10-1 . amd64 mips . -m [multi-arch] fix differing files in /usr/share/doc. Closes: #647283 As of now, binNMUing Multi-Arch:same packages will only make things

Bug#647303: marked as done (nmu: libtasn1-3_2.10-1)

2011-11-01 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 1 Nov 2011 19:53:59 +0100 with message-id 2001185359.gb1...@downhill.g.la and subject line Re: Bug#647303: nmu: libtasn1-3_2.10-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #647303, regarding nmu: libtasn1-3_2.10-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#646254: libhangul transition binnmu

2011-11-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 03:53:51 +0900, Changwoo Ryu wrote: nmu scim-hangul_0.3.2-1 . ALL . -m Rebuild against libhangul 0.1.0-1 Scheduled. Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact

Re: Bug#587315: 'multipath: unknown hardware handler type' with hardware_handler 1 hp-sw

2011-11-01 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 20:15 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: On 10/31/2011 06:33 PM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Mon, October 31, 2011 08:11, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: I would like to propose an update to the multipath-tools package for Squeeze. This proposed upload fixes 2 issues: *

Bug#624591: transition: libgmp3c2 → libgmp10

2011-11-01 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 23:49:07 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: Filing this to track the missing rebuilds. Once they're done we'll be able to remove the gmp4 source package. At this point, gmp4 is kept in testing by: - darcs-monitor: #629784 - darcs: britney picks it up, but one hint fails

Extended release goals info in YAML

2011-11-01 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi, Inspired by #647258 I am proposing that YAMLize our current goals.txt[1] and extend it a bit. I have attached a sample file of how the revised file would look, the API of the file and a little prototype python script that can extract the BTS information from this format. If there are

Re: Multiarch support in dpkg — really in time for wheezy?

2011-11-01 Thread Philipp Kern
Hi, On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:23:27AM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, Philipp Kern wrote: We would like to see a dpkg with multiarch support in experimental now and dpkg in sid in about two weeks time. Otherwise we might not be able to pursue this goal for wheezy.

Re: binNMUs?

2011-11-01 Thread Guillem Jover
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 14:29:00 +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote: I have suggested that the binnmu changelog (which is a single line, or could easily be constrained to a single line) should just become a new control header so that the changelog can be installed unmodified. This could be injected by