Dear Release Managers,
I got a bug #679707:
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012 23:25:35 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
during a test with piuparts I noticed your package left unowned
directories on the system after purge, which is a violation of
policy 6.8:
(snip)
Filing this as important as having a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python3-defaults
Gets RC bug #681235 properly fixed, as the fix I uploaded in 3.2.3-2 missed a
few corner cases. Additionally fixes RC bug #681389.
Debdiff
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package graphviz
Testing contains version 2.26.3-10 of graphviz which currently FTBFS
due to removal of python 2.5 and change to ruby to 1.9 by default.
The previous
Hello,
Please unblock gtkterm 0.99.7~rc1-0.2.
* Non-maintainer upload.
* src/serie.c: Added use of #ifdef __linux__. Closes: #675835. Patch by
Petr Salinger petr.salin...@seznam.cz.
* debian/copyright: Updated.
Debdiff attached.
Regards,
Bart Martens
diff -u
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
#681292 against sbuild. Feel free to clone it if necessary.
I just verified a build in stable and get a bunch of these:
dpkg-source --after-build hello-2.6
parsechangelog/debian: warning: hello-2.6/debian/changelog(l1): unknown
key-value
Any updates of this exception request?
On Tuesday 10 July 2012 08:57 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hi Colin,
Ritesh Raj Sarraf r...@debian.org (10/07/2012):
Now that the old (2.0.873-1) version of the udeb has been removed, and
the newer limited architecture udebs are ready in unstable, this
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package botan1.10
ABI breakage in upstream 1.10.2, see #681066
unblock botan1.10/1.10.3-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package softhsm
/etc/softhsm/softhsm.conf was accidentally distributed in softhsm (and
handled using ucf in softhsm-common), see #681311.
unblock softhsm/1.3.3-2
-- System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package nsd3
Since this version will be the next supported I would like to push
latest upstream, which:
- add support for TLSA RR type
- add support for ECDSA (Elliptic
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:35:52 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 06:02:50PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
What are you talking about?
beast-mcmc-lib |1.6.2-1 | unstable/contrib | armel, armhf, ia64,
powerpc, s390x
The package *is* available on those archs
On 13/07/12 01:57, Jo Shields wrote:
Hi,
Mono 2.10.8.1-5 (a security upload) failed to build on SPARC. The
failure appears to be the fault of a misconfigured buildd (I had no
trouble building on the SPARC porterbox) so I don't see any need to make
changes to the package to make it build.
gb
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:04:25 +0200
with message-id 42a9.5040...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681434: unblock: python3-defaults/3.2.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #681434,
regarding unblock: python3-defaults/3.2.3-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:02:36 +0200
with message-id 423c.7090...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681437: unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-12
has caused the Debian Bug report #681437,
regarding unblock: graphviz/2.26.3-12
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Hi Adam,
thanks for the quick reply.
On Do 12 Jul 2012 22:50:23 CEST Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 12.07.2012 21:09, Mike Gabriel wrote:
Package smarty-gettext 1.0b1-6 got broken by changing from smarty 3.0
to smarty 3.1. A patch against upstream 1.0b1 has been uploaded to
SID with
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:02:18 +
with message-id e1speze-0005ga...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#681109: fixed in llvm-3.0 3.0-10
has caused the Debian Bug report #681109,
regarding nmu: llvm-3.0_3.0-9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package gyoto.
I attach a debdiff and explain the changes below.
1- Security Hardening Buld Flags Release Goal
http://bugs.debian.org/680242
Fix: pass build flags
3- the yorick-full meta-package (src:yorick), already unblocked, is
waiting for yorick-svipc to build on kfreebsd-* before it can migrate.
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=yorick
Fixing the above-mentioned FTBFS takes us halfway through to letting
yorick migrate
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package sbjson
The new version builds with hardening enabled and links correctly with
the libraries it depends on, resulting in correct Depends.
unblock sbjson/2.3.2-2
--
Folks:
I'm an upstream maintainer of Tahoe-LAFS and wanted to post to this
bug just to emphasize that Tahoe-LAFS 1.9.2 is strictly a bugfix
release over Tahoe-LAFS 1.9.1, and it is unlikely to introduce any
regressions or disruptions if you include 1.9.2 in Wheezy. As the
NEWS.rst file ¹ that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libconfig-model-perl
this package has a bug where data is not saved in the configuration file
if hash key names are changed. For more details on what trigger the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package rcs-latex
It was just reported to me via email that rcs-latex is now included in
the current texlive packages. So I have uploaded a dummy transitional
package which
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package cweb-latex
It was just reported to me via email that cweb-latex is now included in
the current texlive packages. So I have uploaded a dummy transitional
package
On 12.07.2012 20:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 12.07.2012 07:47, Liang Guo wrote:
Please unblock spice-gtk.
I upload 0.12-3 to unstable at 29th Jun, and
find a bug[1] which forbit other package to
compile. Then I uploaded 0.12-4 at 9th July,
and this cause 0.12-3 cannot automatically
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 17:18:36 +0100
with message-id 6f15fb1b2d8f562441706c6881bdc...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681479: unblock: libconfig-model-perl/2.021-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #681479,
regarding unblock: libconfig-model-perl/2.021-3
to be
Version: 0.18-1
Toni Mueller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:16:38AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Toni Mueller wrote:
I only discovered today that closing the bug was premature, and the
wrong way to go.
I don't follow. Does 0.18-1 not fix the bug?
it does. I have probably made a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock gunicorn/0.14.5. It fixes a grave security bug (#681471)
as well as a number of smaller issues.
It's been in unstable for 10 or 11 days now and I've been using it
production
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 05:51:08PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
The difference between 0.12-3 and 0.12-4 is slight, just
copy .version and .tarball-version to build directory.
for the build script use the version information in
.tarball-version to determine the version it is building.
On 13.07.2012 11:00, Mike Gabriel wrote:
On Do 12 Jul 2012 22:50:23 CEST Adam D. Barratt wrote:
What's this change about?
+ * debian/install, debian/links:
++ Install as /usr/bin/tsmarty2c (without extension) and drop
the symlink
+ of the same name that used to refer to
Toni Mueller wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:22:37AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Ok, thanks. As long as the bug is not fixed in the version in wheezy,
it will block the release.
ok. I thought it would simply be chucked out, or
Yep, that's another possible outcome. I should have said,
Hi Jonathan,
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 11:22:37AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
Toni Mueller wrote:
it does. I have probably made a mistake, though, but I wanted to have
this package flow into Wheezy, when it appeared to be stuck in
unstable. That's why I thought that the bug should be
Hello Mehdi,
Am Mittwoch, den 11.07.2012, 13:59 +0200 schrieb Mehdi Dogguy:
We would like to 634538 fixed for Wheezy. Unfortunately, the changes
brought by tcpreplay/3.4.4-1 are quite large [1] and we are not able to
unblock the package for Wheezy. Would it be possible to prepare an
upload
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 07:46:15PM +0400, Michael Tokarev wrote:
On 12.07.2012 20:51, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Testing currently has 0.12-1, so the changes which are relevant are
everything after that, not just those in -4.
The original unblock request included SEVERAL diffstats,
one, the
Hi Adam,
On Do 12 Jul 2012 22:50:23 CEST Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Okay, but in that case the changelog is still wrong, as there have been
absolutely
no changes to debian/install:
--- smarty-gettext-1.0b1/debian/install 2012-05-10
18:59:25.0 +
+++
On 13.07.2012 09:23, Ondřej Surý wrote:
Please unblock package botan1.10
ABI breakage in upstream 1.10.2, see #681066
Do you know if any of the reverse dependencies were built against the
broken version and would need rebuilding?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package brewtarget
An NMU for #679437 is in preparation. It turns out that the problematic images
are easily replaced.
I'll attach a debdiff a soon as the NMU is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
This vesion is not ready yet. So far it just consists of a single Spanish
debconf translation (#679053).
I am holding off uploading in case something else turns up. Christian
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:34:16 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
I notice it does not add a class-path change in the Jar file; is this
class-path entry already present? According to the reporter, he also
added a class-path for it to work.
Mea culpa (again). I misled Gregor regarding whether the
On 12/07/12 22:11, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 12.07.2012 20:39, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Short summary of request: please give authorization to
a) upload resiprocate 1.8.4-1 source package to unstable
b) for unblocking 1.8.4-1 to wheezy
Please could you provide a debdiff between the current
On 07/13/2012 03:13 PM, gregor herrmann wrote:
On Thu, 12 Jul 2012 21:34:16 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
I notice it does not add a class-path change in the Jar file; is this
class-path entry already present? According to the reporter, he also
added a class-path for it to work.
Mea culpa
On 14.07.2012 00:14, Daniel Pocock wrote:
On 12/07/12 22:11, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 12.07.2012 20:39, Daniel Pocock wrote:
Short summary of request: please give authorization to
a) upload resiprocate 1.8.4-1 source package to unstable
b) for unblocking 1.8.4-1 to wheezy
Please could you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Please unblock package ptouch-driver in its 1.3-4 version.
unblock ptouch-driver/1.3-4
The upload (debdiff attached) solves the
Nicholas Bamber nicho...@periapt.co.uk (13/07/2012):
This vesion is not ready yet. So far it just consists of a single
Spanish debconf translation (#679053). I am holding off uploading in
case something else turns up. Christian Perrier really wants this in
Wheezy. How long should I play this
Hello,
Chris Lamb la...@debian.org (13/07/2012):
Please unblock gunicorn/0.14.5. It fixes a grave security bug (#681471)
as well as a number of smaller issues.
It's been in unstable for 10 or 11 days now and I've been using it
production for that time without issue.
given the diff against
any feedback would be welcome
Cheers,
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
Hi Release Team,
2 packages of mine, primarily due to demanding resources for build (c++
with heavy use of templating) and testing (I do prefer to do build-time
testing and they use realistic data) always
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package pandas
Very simple fix -- just tagged a test requiring network access (those are
excluded from being run in debian/rules). This closes #681449
unblock
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:56:14 +0100
with message-id 9ad79cad185984e41c400b1bc7af5...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681536: unblock: pandas/0.8.0-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #681536,
regarding unblock: pandas/0.8.0-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jul 2012 02:59:13 +0100
with message-id 77f3d5d8aa0f24acbdf73284d1f60...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681534: unblock: ptouch-driver/1.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #681534,
regarding unblock: ptouch-driver/1.3-4
to be marked as done.
This
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:35:52 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Ups, that's new to me. I was told that autobuilders do not fetch
Build-Depends from non-free. This is good news on one hand - I will
try to investigate how the other archs might proceed.
Your message dated Sat, 14 Jul 2012 03:09:18 +0100
with message-id 8fa9b6624a028d65cbcc2149c16a9...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#681447: unblock: softhsm/1.3.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #681447,
regarding unblock: softhsm/1.3.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package ssed,
it only contains changes for the security hardening release goal.
unblock ssed/3.62-7
-BEGIN
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 08:27:22PM -0600, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 10:35:52 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
Ups, that's new to me. I was told that autobuilders do not fetch
Build-Depends from non-free. This is good news on one
Your message dated Fri, 13 Jul 2012 22:31:58 -0600
with message-id 20120714043158.ga9...@spike.0x539.de
and subject line Re: Bug#681547: unblock: ssed/3.62-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #681547,
regarding unblock: ssed/3.62-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-csa
Fixes two RC bugs, 595848 and 665039.
unblock python-csa/0.1.0-1.1
diff -Nru python-csa-0.1.0/debian/changelog python-csa-0.1.0/debian/changelog
---
53 matches
Mail list logo