clone 683030 -1
retitle -1 unblock libav
block 683030 by -1
tag -1 moreinfo
stop
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Depends: vlc libav (not considered)
The new libav does not have an
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
clone 683030 -1
Bug #683030 [release.debian.org] unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1
Bug 683030 cloned as bug 683247
retitle -1 unblock libav
Bug #683247 [release.debian.org] unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock libav' from 'unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1'
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:16:57PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
nmu bobcat_3.01.00-1 . ALL . -m recompilation with current g++ (closes:
#683049)
What's the condition here? What changes to g++ will cause it to need a rebuild?
Kind regards
Philipp Kern
signature.asc
Description: Digital
Dear Adam,
Am 29.07.2012 23:16, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
I did not apply this change but recognize it from Emdebian sprint:
Reason is, I believe, to ease bootstrapping new architectures by
suppressing build of arch-all packages.
Jonas is right. The main reason for this change was to make it
Am 28.07.2012 17:47, schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
- the changelog also doesn't mention the dropping of the ffmpeg
Provides.
This was also my change, I am sorry this slipped through without
proper documentation. However, this field was so utterly wrong in that
libav-tools simply does not provide
Hi,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
I'm happy to prepare a stable update to fix this. Would you accept it?
I presume there are no other RC bugfixes for dpkg/stable pending at the
moment?
Guillem mentionned an SELinux fix that would be worth including too.
The commit that fixes it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello,
hwloc still hasn't reached testing, due to being compiled against the
latest numactl which was uploaded to sid, and for which no unblock
request was made yet, so here is one.
The
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi, [ please Cc me on replies, I'm not subscribed to -release ]
I would like to upload to sid a bug fix against libisoburn/1.2.2-1,
which we would like to further have in wheezy as well.
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 01:51:46 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 02:53:19PM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote:
(I'd currently tend to accept it, however I'm not yet sure of all the
consequences of this change.)
This change in itself should not have any consequence as it should
On 2012-07-30 03:21, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Subject: unblock: datapacker/1.0.1+nmu2
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package datapacker
I've NMU'd this package to fix RC bug #629774.
Diff
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:06:57 +0200
with message-id 50164eb1.4070...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#683234: unblock: desktop-base/7.0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683234,
regarding unblock: desktop-base/7.0.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:08:58 +0200
with message-id 50164f2a.8000...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#683220: unblock: mysql-5.5/5.5.24+dfsg-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #683220,
regarding unblock: mysql-5.5/5.5.24+dfsg-6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package starpu-contrib
It fixes important Bug#680898: “build-depends on gcc-4.5/g++-4.6;
build-conflicts against obsolete gcc version on x86” by simply using gcc
4.4
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 11:42:11 +0200
with message-id 501656f3.7060...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#683200: unblock: ganeti/2.5.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683200,
regarding unblock: ganeti/2.5.2-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:56:11PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
This email is related to bug #681352 (amd64-microcode), and to an
yet-unfilled freeze exception request for intel-microcode.
Just looking at amd64-microcode:
The initramfs hook does not specify set -e. Should it?
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:56:11PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
This email is related to bug #681352 (amd64-microcode), and to an
yet-unfilled freeze exception request for intel-microcode.
Just looking at amd64-microcode:
The
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please consider unblocking virtinst and virt-manager.
These are mostly bugfix releases.
Thank you,
--
Laurent Léonard
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package starplot
The current starplot version in testing (and stable) is 0.95.5-4,
I uploaded an updated version 0.95.5-5 before wheezy was frozen, with
some Debian
On 2012-07-30 12:48, Laurent Léonard wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please consider unblocking virtinst and virt-manager.
These are mostly bugfix releases.
Thank you,
Hi,
The changes between the testing and unstable versions of these packages
are huge. At first
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package salt
By requiring dmidecode salt can't be installed on non x86 systems like
arm. This issue was raised by an user in the upstream chat who wanted to
install salt on
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:18:52 +0200
with message-id 50166d9c.8070...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#683268: unblock: starplot/0.95.5-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #683268,
regarding unblock: starplot/0.95.5-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-07-30 03:21, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Subject: unblock: datapacker/1.0.1+nmu2
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:37:16 +0200
with message-id 501671ec.9070...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#682385: unblock: mod-gearman/1.3.6-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #682385,
regarding unblock: mod-gearman/1.3.6-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:45:56 +0200
with message-id 501673f4.1000...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#683235: unblock: datapacker/1.0.1+nmu2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683235,
regarding unblock: datapacker/1.0.1+nmu2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
On 30.07.2012 12:38, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:03:08AM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-07-30 03:21, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
Please unblock package datapacker
I've NMU'd this package to fix RC bug #629774.
Diff attached.
unblock datapacker/1.0.1+nmu2
[...]
On 2012-07-22 15:49, Petr Salinger wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package xserver-xorg-input-mouse
The current one in testing is completely unuseable on kfreebsd-*.
Changed-By: Cyril
On 2012-07-24 15:28, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
Greetings,
as a follow-up to my first message about mmass [0], I hereby kindly
ask to unlock the mmass* packages. I have successfully uploaded the
packages a while ago.
Thank you so much,
Cheers,
Filippo
[0]
[BCCed to the vlc bug for info; let's move discussion to the libav
clone]
On 30.07.2012 08:08, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, 2012-07-28 at 15:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Depends: vlc libav (not
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 13:19:55 +0100
with message-id 1e42b38c1cab6e389b163c50b1d18...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683030: unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683030,
regarding unblock: vlc/2.0.3-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Hi,
On 30.07.2012 06:09, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 20:23:28 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Any remaining automatic exceptions will therefore be retired after
the
final britney run on July 30th - i.e. one month after freeze.
Due to the block-udeb set in place, packages with
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 14:36:11 +0200
with message-id 20120730123611.ga22...@spike.0x539.de
and subject line Re: Bug#683260: unblock: starpu-contrib/1.0.1-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683260,
regarding unblock: starpu-contrib/1.0.1-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On 2012-07-23 10:56, Pierre Chifflier wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
GLPI 0.83.31 (micro-fix based on 0.83.3) is an important security
release, fixing two CVEs:
CVE-2012-4002:
Bug #3704: CSRF
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package consolekit
This fixes an segfaulting error, the patch is minimal and tested (see #570015)
unblock consolekit/0.4.5-3.1
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:08:50 +0200
with message-id 50168762.3030...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#683276: unblock: consolekit/0.4.5-3.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #683276,
regarding unblock: consolekit/0.4.5-3.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
submitter 683247 !
Bug #683247 [release.debian.org] unblock libav
Changed Bug submitter to 'Reinhard Tartler siret...@tauware.de' from
'Benjamin Drung bdr...@debian.org'
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package moin
Small changes to add extra features to help with anti-spam. Once it's
in testing I'll do a backport again so that we can get the new code
onto wiki.debian.org.
Just put up updated details at
http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/tmp/new-tasks/2012-07-30/
Gnome and KDE are looking closer, but still not there yet. Are we
going to get dpkg xz support in the archive soon?
Also: something weird on this week's light CD build. For some reason
we've now got
On 07/30/2012 12:18 AM, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:16:57PM -0700, tony mancill wrote:
nmu bobcat_3.01.00-1 . ALL . -m recompilation with current g++ (closes:
#683049)
What's the condition here? What changes to g++ will cause it to need a
rebuild?
Kind regards
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
2.9.0-4 would have migrated if there was no udeb block, 2.9.0-5 contains
fix for FTBFS on kfreebsd.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:
Package: release.debian.org
please remove the udeb block.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
4.5.0-3 fixes syslinux paths as used in debian (#682974).
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
1:2012.1.15AR.5-3 would have migrated if there was no udeb block,
1:2012.1.15AR.5-4 contains l10n updates.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
5.2-4 contains a documentation update.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2 would have migrated in time,
2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3 fixes the FTBFS of the dkms module.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
3.0.0-3 would have migrated in time, 3.0.0-4 fixes a syntax error in the
init script.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package kvirc
This is a resend/summary of [0] according to [1].
kvirc (4:4.1.3+2024.svn5988-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Updated debhelper build-depends to better
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package octave
This version fixes #682207, which is of severity important and multi-arch
related.
Thanks,
unblock octave/3.6.2-4
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package htop, version 1.0.1-2.
As discussed with Adam Barratt via #debian-release, -2 just adds a
single patch from upstream to fix bug 662087.
debdiff:
diff -u
Philipp Kern, le Mon 30 Jul 2012 14:36:11 +0200, a écrit :
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:13:00AM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
It fixes important Bug#680898: “build-depends on gcc-4.5/g++-4.6;
build-conflicts against obsolete gcc version on x86” by simply using gcc
4.4 instead, see attached
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:35:06 +0100
with message-id 1343669706.23068.0.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683307: unblock: octave/3.6.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #683307,
regarding unblock: octave/3.6.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On 07/30/2012 07:39 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
s/your're/you're/
fixed in git, thanks.
--
Address:Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--
To
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:39:16 +0100
with message-id 1343669956.23068.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683300: unblock: tftpd-hpa/5.2-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #683300,
regarding unblock: tftpd-hpa/5.2-4
to be marked as done.
This means that
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 18:45:27 +0100
with message-id 1343670327.23068.3.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683297: unblock: gfxboot/4.5.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #683297,
regarding unblock: gfxboot/4.5.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:08:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
AFAIUI the multi-arch spec, arch:all packages are not allowed to
specify Multi-Arch: foreign, so I had the impression that this part
was rather obvious to multi-arch experts. Which I am clearly not, so
being more explicit in the
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 13:53 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Please unblock package moin
Small changes to add extra features to help with anti-spam. Once it's
in testing I'll do a backport again so that we can get the new code
onto wiki.debian.org. Debdiff attached.
Possibly a little picky (or
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 23:24 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
Proposed stable update for automake1.9.
This looks like the patches that are already in stable?
+automake1.9 (1.9.6+nogfdl-3.1) unstable; urgency=high
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 22:24 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
Proposed stable update for automake1.10.
+automake1.10 (1:1.10.3-1+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
+
+ * lib/am/distdir.am: Backport fix for CVE-2012-3386 Temporary worldwide
+write permissions during make distcheck. (Closes: #681117)
+
+
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:08:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
AFAIUI the multi-arch spec, arch:all packages are not allowed to
specify Multi-Arch: foreign, so I had the impression that this part
was rather obvious to multi-arch experts. Which I am
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 18:12:28 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2 would have migrated in time,
2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3 fixes the FTBFS of the dkms
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 683299 + moreinfo
Bug #683299 [release.debian.org] unblock:
open-vm-tools/2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
683299:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: jac...@debian.org
Please unblock package yagf
Fixes not RC bug #682102
unblock yagf/0.9.1-3
diff -Nru yagf-0.9.1/debian/changelog yagf-0.9.1/debian/changelog
---
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:01:20 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:08:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
AFAIUI the multi-arch spec, arch:all packages are not allowed to
specify Multi-Arch: foreign, so I had the impression
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:29:44 +0200, bertagaz wrote:
unblock tahoe-lafs/1.9.2-1
Please unblock package tahoe-lafs
145 files changed, 5152 insertions(+), 3138 deletions(-)
:(
excluding docs and tests, it's still
131 files changed, 4290 insertions(+), 2705 deletions(-)
which is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mtink
Two FTBFS issues fixed: one for new lesstif2 (which is not in wheezy
yet), the other for dpkg-dev 'binary' vs 'binary-arch'.
Unfortunately I wasn't thinking
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 20:32:01 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:29:44 +0200, bertagaz wrote:
unblock tahoe-lafs/1.9.2-1
Please unblock package tahoe-lafs
145 files changed, 5152 insertions(+), 3138 deletions(-)
:(
excluding docs and tests, it's still
Hi,
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 20:59 +0300, Boris Pek wrote:
Please unblock package yagf
Fixes not RC bug #682102
unblock yagf/0.9.1-3
We can't unblock something that hasn't been upload yet...
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package licq
Contains fix for RC bug and correction to release goal. From changelog:
* Add lintian override for hardening-no-fortify-functions
* Make licq depend
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:16:07 +0200
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:01:20 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org writes:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:08:50 +0200, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
AFAIUI the multi-arch spec, arch:all
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 18:25 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
* Adam D. Barratt (a...@adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 00:32 -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
Sorry Jonathan, due to some personal commitments and the flu I haven't
gotten to this yet. But I'll prepare these by the end of
Processing changes file: automake1.11_1.11.1-1+squeeze1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1svvec-0004fz...@franck.debian.org
On 07/30/2012 08:08 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2 would have migrated in time,
2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3 fixes the FTBFS of the dkms module.
See the existing requests for clarification of the changes.
i don't understand what you're talking about. let me repeat:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 21:15:37 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/30/2012 08:08 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2 would have migrated in time,
2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-3 fixes the FTBFS of the dkms module.
See the existing requests for clarification of the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
Hi,
please unblock bind9. The version in unstable contains an isolated fix for
CVE-2012-3817.
unblock: bind9/1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4.2
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde -
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package python-apt
Since the version of testing, this contains mostly bug fixes and
many translation updates, but also (starting with 0.8.5) one new
module (apt.auth) which
On 07/30/2012 09:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
I don't care that 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2 would have
migrated, since it didn't. I'm looking at the diff between
testing and sid.
ok, good to know.
so the rational is then, contra common sense, to not fix RC bugs in
sid before a package has
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 21:25:03 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/30/2012 09:18 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
I don't care that 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2 would have
migrated, since it didn't. I'm looking at the diff between
testing and sid.
ok, good to know.
so the rational is
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:25:36 +0100
with message-id 1343676336.23068.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683322: unblock: bind9/1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4.2
has caused the Debian Bug report #683322,
regarding unblock: bind9/1:9.8.1.dfsg.P1-4.2
to be marked as
Your message dated Mon, 30 Jul 2012 20:29:17 +0100
with message-id 1343676557.23068.18.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#683280: unblock: moin/1.9.4-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #683280,
regarding unblock: moin/1.9.4-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 06:52:19PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 13:53 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
Please unblock package moin
Small changes to add extra features to help with anti-spam. Once it's
in testing I'll do a backport again so that we can get the new code
onto
On 07/30/2012 09:27 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
No, the idea is to not make unnecessary changes the day before the
freeze.
there is no unnecessary change in 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2.
apart from that: if you don't want people to upload stuff right before
the freeze, then don't announce the
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 21:44:05 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/30/2012 09:27 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
No, the idea is to not make unnecessary changes the day before the
freeze.
there is no unnecessary change in 2:8.8.0+2012.05.21-724730-2.
Great, then explaining the changes
On 07/30/2012 09:47 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Great, then explaining the changes should be straightforward.
as i've read, other people on debian-release@lists.debian.org did that
already to the full extend.
I don't mind people uploading stuff right before the freeze as long
as they don't mind
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 21:53:45 +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/30/2012 09:47 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Great, then explaining the changes should be straightforward.
as i've read, other people on debian-release@lists.debian.org did that
already to the full extend.
And as you've no
On 07/30/2012 10:02 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
And as you've no doubt read I'm not satisfied with that explanation, so
please try again.
again, i see not where i could add anything else that other people
already said.
Or if you prefer, I can remove the package from
wheezy, that works just as
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 10:09:02PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sun, 2012-07-29 at 22:36 +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote:
Please unblock package worldwind. Release 0.5.0-9 fixes bug number #682411
(FTBFS)
[...]
-JAVA_HOME:= /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/
+BUILDARCH?=
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: freeze-exception
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Dear Release Team
libcrypt-ssleay-perl has a missing dependency on
liblwp-protocol-https-perl, which is tracked in bugreport
Hello,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 02:02:42PM +0200, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-07-24 15:28, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
as a follow-up to my first message about mmass [0], I hereby kindly
ask to unlock the mmass* packages. I have successfully uploaded the
packages a while ago.
[0]
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 08:37:05PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 20:32:01 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 12:29:44 +0200, bertagaz wrote:
unblock tahoe-lafs/1.9.2-1
Please unblock package tahoe-lafs
145 files changed, 5152
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 23:01:00 +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
Dunno what to say, appart that 1.9.1 *is* broken, and it shouldn't be
shipped into wheezy, as it *has been reported* to be so to upstream by
many users.
Ok, that's good to know. Though if it's that broken one wonders
Neil Williams codeh...@debian.org writes:
Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
This means that for an Architecture: all package to satisfy the
dependencies of a foreign-architecture package, it must be marked
Multi-Arch: foreign or Multi-Arch: allowed.
Hi! Thanks for double-checking the diff from Tahoe-LAFS 1.9.1 to
1.9.2, Julien. Here's our map of the changes that we intended to
commit. If you see that there are substantial changes other than the
ones listed here, then I would like to know about it! Thanks.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 22:52:03 +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
How could we manage to have that new package in Debian stable ? I
would not mind removing from unstable the current version so that a
new upload of version 5.1.0-2 would succeed. Or upload to another
place ?
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:18:33PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 23:01:00 +0200, berta...@ptitcanardnoir.org wrote:
Dunno what to say, appart that 1.9.1 *is* broken, and it shouldn't be
shipped into wheezy, as it *has been reported* to be so to upstream by
many
P.S. Also there is this view, which shows all the patches that were
committed to the 1.9.2 branch:
https://tahoe-lafs.org/trac/tahoe-lafs/log/1.9.2/?action=follow_copymode=follow_copyrev=5540stop_rev=limit=61verbose=on
Regards,
Zooko
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
But then please don't spend your night on that particular package. While I
was replying to you, someone raised a bug (#683331) that should probably
be fixed before tahoe-lafs would be included in wheezy. So I'll probably
close this one, and schedule inclusion for Wheezy+1 if possible (cause it
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package e2fsprogs
This fixes a number of fairly serious bugs:
* It fixes a foreign multiarch bug (#678395), and multiarch is a
release goal
* It fixes a bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package cciss-vol-status
The version in sid adds new hardware support (and closes #680310 for this),
which I was only made aware of after the freeze.
(The build process now
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:30:30PM -0600, Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn wrote:
But then please don't spend your night on that particular package. While I
was replying to you, someone raised a bug (#683331) that should probably
be fixed before tahoe-lafs would be included in wheezy. So I'll probably
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:56:11PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
This email is related to bug #681352 (amd64-microcode), and to an
yet-unfilled freeze exception request for
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:07:14PM +0200, Daniel Baumann wrote:
On 07/30/2012 10:02 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Or if you prefer, I can remove the package from
wheezy, that works just as well as far as I'm concerned, but I thought
I'd give it a chance.
feel free to do so if you think that
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
