Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 07:41:40 +0100
with message-id 1346481700.7606.48.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#686404: unblock: texlive-base/2012.20120611-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #686404,
regarding unblock: texlive-base/2012.20120611-4
to be marked
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 07:48:46 +0100
with message-id 1346482126.7606.49.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#686398: unblock: manpages-fr-extra/20120831
has caused the Debian Bug report #686398,
regarding unblock: manpages-fr-extra/20120831
to be marked as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dma-0.0.2010.06.17-14. It fixes a grave
bug (#686164) with a minimal change to a patch and a refreshing
of the line numbers of several other patches.
I attach a
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:00:28 +0200
with message-id 5041b28c.4000...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#686401: unblock: lojban-common/1.5+dfsg-0.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686401,
regarding unblock: lojban-common/1.5+dfsg-0.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 09:02:06 +0200
with message-id 5041b2ee.80...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#686405: unblock: libpam-rsa/0.8-9-2.4
has caused the Debian Bug report #686405,
regarding unblock: libpam-rsa/0.8-9-2.4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
On 2012-09-01 09:00, Niels Thykier wrote:
On 2012-09-01 01:52, David Prévot wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package lojban-common, it's just a translat^Wrepack
trimming a non-DFSG file.
The
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 09:54:55AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package dma-0.0.2010.06.17-14. It fixes a grave
bug (#686164) with a minimal change to a patch and a
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 10:16:48 +0100
with message-id 1346491008.7606.50.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#686412: unblock: dma/0.0.2010.06.17-14
has caused the Debian Bug report #686412,
regarding unblock: dma/0.0.2010.06.17-14
to be marked as done.
This
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 685687 - moreinfo
Bug #685687 [release.debian.org] unblock: ardour/1:2.8.14-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
685687:
Your message dated Sat, 1 Sep 2012 13:13:29 +0200
with message-id 2012090329.gr6...@radis.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#685284: unblock: first bunch of packages switching to
xz
has caused the Debian Bug report #685284,
regarding unblock: first bunch of packages switching to xz
to be
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package imvirt
It adds an upstream patch to fix a missdetection of physical hosts as LXC
virtualized ones.
diff -Naur '--exclude=.svn' 0.9.4-3/debian/changelog
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mlt
It adds two upstream patches - which are also available in 0.8.2 - to fix:
04-cache-memory-leak: Huge memory leak which could cause mlt to leak more than
8 GB
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 12:54:43 +0100
with message-id 1346500483.7606.52.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#686424: unblock: imvirt/0.9.4-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #686424,
regarding unblock: imvirt/0.9.4-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 12:53:40 +0100
with message-id 1346500420.7606.51.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#686425: unblock: mlt/0.8.0-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #686425,
regarding unblock: mlt/0.8.0-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
tags 682087 - moreinfo
retitle 682087 unblock: skksearch/0.0-21
thanks
Please unblock skksearch/0.0-21 to enable hardening flags for wheezy.
On July 27, 2012 at 10:41PM +0200,
jcristau (at debian.org) wrote:
Note that the diff has increased because of renaming debian/patches/*,
but there
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 682087 - moreinfo
Bug #682087 [release.debian.org] unblock: skksearch/0.0-20
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
retitle 682087 unblock: skksearch/0.0-21
Bug #682087 [release.debian.org] unblock: skksearch/0.0-20
Changed Bug title to 'unblock:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 682097 - moreinfo
Bug #682097 [release.debian.org] unblock: dbskkd-cdb/1:2.00-5
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
retitle 682097 unblock: dbskkd-cdb/1:2.00-6
Bug #682097 [release.debian.org] unblock: dbskkd-cdb/1:2.00-5
Changed Bug title to 'unblock:
tags 682097 - moreinfo
retitle 682097 unblock: dbskkd-cdb/1:2.00-6
thanks
Please unblock dbskkd-cdb/1:2.00-6 to enable hardening flags for wheezy.
On August 31, 2012 at 9:17PM +0100,
adam (at adam-barratt.org.uk) wrote:
-CFLAGS := -Wall -g -O$(if $(findstring noopt,$(DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS)),0,2)
Hi,
Is there any progress for this unblock request?
boinc is in NEW, and we've responded to FTP Masters' (Luca and Ansgar)
request by doing some fixes, updating boinc to 7.0.34+dfsg-2 which
conforms to FTP Masters' requirement. Now we (FTP Masters and BOINC
team) are waiting for you comment
On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 10:16:48AM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Sat, 2012-09-01 at 09:54 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Please unblock package dma-0.0.2010.06.17-14. It fixes a grave
bug (#686164) with a minimal change to a patch and a refreshing
of the line numbers of several other
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:19:15PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 22:55 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 10:33:42PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 22:11 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:32:37AM
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 14:58:42 +0100
with message-id 1346507922.7606.53.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#684068: unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #684068,
regarding unblock: open-iscsi/2.0.873-3
to be marked as done.
This
On Sat, 2012-09-01 at 14:31 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:19:15PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 22:55 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
[...]
No, there hasn't been any comment on that patch other than from me and
Niko. That's not entirely
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 18:16:14 +0100
with message-id 1346519774.7606.62.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: unblock: cvs2svn/2.3.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #685853,
regarding unblock: cvs2svn/2.3.0-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
Please unblock silo/1.4.14+git20120819-1 for testing. It fixes an RC
bug (#685245) affecting Debian installer images on Niagara machines
and contains two more bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pidgin-latex
It adds an upstream patch which will be also available in 1.4.5 to fix:
01_security_issue.patch: Insuficient validation on blacklist wich could cause
Control: owner -1 !
On Thu, Aug 02, 2012 at 02:57:35PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Please unblock package intel-microcode
These are changes that are quite large. I'm willing to unblock them, though, as
they work much better / more reliable than microcode.ctl. The only thing left
Processing control commands:
owner -1 !
Bug #683674 [release.debian.org] unblock: intel-microcode/1.20120606.3
Owner recorded as Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org.
--
683674: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683674
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 20:22:12 +0100
with message-id 1346527332.25118.0.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#686455: unblock: pidgin-latex/1.4.4-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #686455,
regarding unblock: pidgin-latex/1.4.4-2
to be marked as done.
This
Your message dated Sat, 01 Sep 2012 20:25:08 +0100
with message-id 1346527508.25118.2.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#686451: unblock: silo/1.4.14+git20120819-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #686451,
regarding unblock: silo/1.4.14+git20120819-1
to be marked as
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 08:21:14AM +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
which was filed against the release.debian.org package:
#686319: unblock: iceweasel/10.0.7esr-1
It has been closed by Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org.
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Dead upstream, orphaned.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #686462 [release.debian.org] release.debian.org: unblock:
ruby-pgplot/0.1.3-6
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
686462: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686462
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 05:53 +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
I'll request you to unblock ruby-pgplot package, version 0.1.3-6
- It will fix three FTBFS bugs:
- http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=675390
-
On Sat, 2012-09-01 at 22:52 +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote:
Dead upstream, orphaned.
In that case, would it not make more sense to remove it from unstable?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
On Saturday 01 September 2012 12:50 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Thanks for bearing with us. Having looked over both the Debian and
upstream changelogs and taking in to account that no significant issues
have been found and the part we played in delaying both the review and
migration, I feel
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk
In that case, would it not make more sense to remove it from unstable?
Sure, why not. Removing it from the upcoming stable distribution is
really necessary anyway.
--
Thibaut VARENE
http://www.parisc-linux.org/~varenet/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
Hi,
A new Gajim release fixes some bugs in the current 0.15 release.
A list of fixed bugs is here: [0]
4 debian bugs are also closed, including an important one:
[1], [2], [3], [4].
I prepared a package for this bug-fix only release: [5].
But the question is: does it have any chance to go in
Hi,
Thanks for quick reply.
At 1 Sep 2012 22:25:45 +0100,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 05:53 +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
I'll request you to unblock ruby-pgplot package, version 0.1.3-6
- It will fix three FTBFS
Control: found -1 0.3.1-1
Hi,
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 08:51:40PM +0100, Johan Euphrosine wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Enrico Zini enr...@enricozini.org wrote:
Hello,
thank you for maintaining jscoverage.
jscoverage 0.3.1-1 is currently in squeeze and sid and has RC bugs
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package glm, it's a simple repack removing a directory
full of useless Windows stuff which aren't DFSG-free.
unblock glm/0.9.3.3+dfsg-0.1
Thanks in advance, regards
David
41 matches
Mail list logo
