Hello release team,
last Monday, new PostgreSQL microreleases were announced
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1416/
They've been in Debian unstable for a week now, without any regression
reports in Debian, Ubuntu, or the upstream bug list.
As usual, they are on
http://people.debian.org/~m
> The package does not appear to ever use ucf to manage its configuration
> files, nor is there any suggestion in the changelog that it ever did so.
> If that's the case, why are the calls to ucf{,r} in the postrm to begin
> with?
The ucf calls in postrm seem to be remnants of the moodle package c
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
last week, PostgreSQL announced new bug fix microreleases:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1416/
I uploaded 8.4.14 into unstable last Monday:
http://packages
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
last week, PostgreSQL announced new bug fix microreleases:
http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1416/
This includes a serious data loss bug fix.
I uploaded 9.1.6 in
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 05:10:59PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 00:29:42 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
>
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: unblock
> >
> > Please unblock package msva-pe
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
Please unblock package refpolicy version 2:2.20110726-11, changes since
version -9 (which is in testing atm) are:
* Fix #683756 (selinux in permissive mode breaks gdm an
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Hello,
Please unblock xchat 2.8.8-7. It fixes "grave" bug 147832 about loss of data
when the disk is full. Debdiff attached. It's basically ten times the same
approach like I did for bug
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 01:42:23 +0530, Rahul Amaram wrote:
>
> On Monday 01 October 2012 12:08 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
> >It also has some ssl changes, like using the snakeoil cert from
> >ssl-cert, but doesn't seem to actually depend on ssl-cert. How is that
> >supposed to work?
> >
> calend
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> affects 686054 msva-perl
Bug #686054 [release.debian.org] unblock: msva-perl/0.9.1-1
Ignoring request to set affects of bug 686054 to the same value previously set
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
6
On Monday 01 October 2012 12:08 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 22:33:14 +0530, Rahul Amaram wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package calendarserver
This release fixes a very im
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello, dear release team,
Please unblock package alpine.
I'd like to ask you for a freeze exception for a few fixes to alpine.
Some might say they are "cosmetic" fixes, but I want to try
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 22:33:14 +0530, Rahul Amaram wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package calendarserver
>
> This release fixes a very important bug (Bug#678525) without which
> calen
On Saturday 29 September 2012 12:56 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2012-09-10 19:03, Rahul Amaram wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package calendarserver
This release fixe
On Wed, 2012-08-22 at 13:35 +0200, Hector Romojaro wrote:
> Just waiting to see if anyone else has something to say about it, but it
> doesn't seem the case.
>
> Ok, i'll prepare the fix for #677060 and ask for upload to
> testing-proposed-updates.
That now happened, but on reviewing it I have to
Your message dated Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:12:42 +0100
with message-id <1349021562.15180.56.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#688983: unblock: tasksel/3.13
has caused the Debian Bug report #688983,
regarding unblock: tasksel/3.13
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Joey Hess (27/09/2012):
> Please unblock tasksel 3.13. Diff is attached.
>
> The most important fixes in here are a workaround for #651495,
> so xfce will have a working mixer, and dropping gnash from kde,
> so konqueror doesn't segfault. I believe that the lxde maintainers
> also consider switch
On Sun, 2012-09-30 at 09:56 -0400, Antoine Beaupré wrote:
> On 2012-09-30, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > How is the unblock request blocking the fixing of the bug? The bug is
> > already fixed and it's not even blocking the transition of the fix,
> > given that the unblock was added.
>
> True, it doe
On 2012-09-30, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> How is the unblock request blocking the fixing of the bug? The bug is
> already fixed and it's not even blocking the transition of the fix,
> given that the unblock was added.
True, it doesn't. However, there was nothing in the bug report here
refering to th
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 20:34:45 +0200, Arno Töll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared a t-p-u upload for calibre fixing _only_ #653328. I'm
> slightly confused, why you ask for an update through t-p-u if you intend
> to unblock 0.8.64+dfsg-1 which is in Sid currently and fixes the issues
> outlined.
>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mathematica-fonts, it fixes an important issue
via unstable (#686260: allow for translation of all user-visible
messages), with a review of all descriptions, update mo
Your message dated Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:24:02 +0100
with message-id <1349004242.15180.32.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#681107: unblock: qscintilla2/2.6.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #681107,
regarding unblock: qscintilla2/2.6.2-1
to be marked as done.
This me
Your message dated Sun, 30 Sep 2012 12:40:25 +0200
with message-id <20120930104025.gg31...@radis.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#688876: unblock: mathematica-fonts/15
has caused the Debian Bug report #688876,
regarding unblock: mathematica-fonts/16
to be marked as done.
This means that you c
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package apt-listbugs
As can be seen with the following command on the git repository:
$ git diff apt-listbugs/0.1.7..apt-listbugs/0.1.8 | filterdiff \
--exclude='*
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:14:19 +0900, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> Dear Release Managers,
>
> Please unblock mathematica-fonts_16. This fixes only Spanish
> translation from mathematica-fonts_15.
>
> Sorry for not so good co-operation with transalation team.
>
Please file a separate bug.
Cheers
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # Migrating to DD account
> submitter 675914 !
Bug #675914 [devscripts] devscripts: [pts-subscribe] does not correctly encode
8-bit characters in From header of sent mail
Changed Bug submitter to 'Sébastien Villemot ' from
'Sébastien Villemot '
On 09/29/2012 09:37 PM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 15:16:06 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 09/26/2012 02:59 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
Normally the config script doesn't touch configuration files, it reads
the current configuration if it exists, updates the values in debconf
On 30/09/2012 11:22, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le dimanche 30 septembre 2012 à 10:55 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet a écrit :
>> On 29/09/2012 11:52, Josselin Mouette wrote:
>>> * Require firefox extensions that match epiphany functionality:
>>> keyring, adblock.
>>
>> Epiphany doesn't block ads,
Your message dated Sun, 30 Sep 2012 10:21:53 +0100
with message-id <1348996913.15180.30.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#689194: unblock: puppet/2.7.18-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #689194,
regarding unblock: puppet/2.7.18-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Le dimanche 30 septembre 2012 à 10:55 +0200, Olivier Bonvalet a écrit :
> On 29/09/2012 11:52, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> > * Require firefox extensions that match epiphany functionality:
> > keyring, adblock.
>
> Epiphany doesn't block ads, so why Iceweasel should block it ?
The adblock e
On Sun, 2012-09-30 at 03:30 +, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
> Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
>
> > block 680670 with 688793
> Bug #680670 {Done: Gaudenz Steinlin } [obnam] obnam:
> add_key doesn't encrypt symmetric key with new key
> 680670 was not blocked by any bugs.
On 29/09/2012 11:52, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> * Require firefox extensions that match epiphany functionality:
> keyring, adblock.
Epiphany doesn't block ads, so why Iceweasel should block it ?
Also, since ads are often the main funding source of a website, I think
blocking ads is a «poli
32 matches
Mail list logo
