Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 09:20:25 +0200
with message-id 50727eb9.2060...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689937: unblock: abiword/2.9.2+svn20120603-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #689937,
regarding unblock: abiword/2.9.2+svn20120603-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687628: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-account-statement/2.2.1-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:08:54 +0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:52 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
please approve the upload of tryton-modules-account-statement_2.2.1-1.
The
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687631: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-calendar/2.2.1-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:08:31 +0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:57 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
please approve the upload of unblock: tryton-modules-calendar_2.2.1-1.
The new
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687633: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-calendar-scheduling/2.2.2-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:08:13 +0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:08 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
please approve the upload of tryton-modules-calendar-scheduling_2.2.2-1.
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687634: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-calendar-todo/2.2.1-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:07:57 +0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:13 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
please approve the upload of tryton-modules-calendar-todo_2.2.1-1.
The new
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687639: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-stock-supply/2.2.2-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:07:01 +0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:32 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
please approve the upload of tryton-modules-stock-supply_2.2.2-1.
The new
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687636: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-product/2.2.2-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:07:39 +0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:25 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
please approve the upload of tryton-modules-product_2.2.2-1.
The new version contains
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687691: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-timesheet/2.2.2-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:06:43 +0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2012-09-15 at 10:11 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
please approve the upload of tryton-modules-timesheet_2.2.2-1.
The new version
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687638: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-stock/2.2.3-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:07:21 +0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 14:28 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
please approve the upload of tryton-modules-stock_2.2.3-1.
The new version contains the
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687625: pre-approve unblock: tryton-client/2.2.3-1 (Wed, 03
Oct 2012 19:09:50 +0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:27 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
please approve the upload of tryton-client_2.2.3-1.
The new version contains the upstream bug
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687695: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-party-vcarddav/2.2.1-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:06:22 +0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 14:22 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687695: pre-approve unblock:
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687627: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-account/2.2.3-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 19:09:12 +0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2012-09-14 at 13:46 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
please approve the upload of tryton-modules-account_2.2.3-1.
The new version contains
* Betr.: Re: Bug#687632: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-calendar-classification/2.2.1-1 (Wed, 03 Oct 2012 20:23:25
+0100):
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 21:22 +0200, Mathias Behrle wrote:
could I please have a go for this issue, too, as for the the other
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 11:35:09 +0200
with message-id 50729e4d.8010...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#689818: unblock: xml-light/2.2-15
has caused the Debian Bug report #689818,
regarding unblock: xml-light/2.2-15
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
reassign 689107 release.debian.org
Bug #689107 {Done: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org} [w3c-linkchecker]
piuparts failures
Bug #688736 {Done: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org} [w3c-linkchecker]
w3c-linkchecker: modifies conffiles (policy
Your message dated Mon, 8 Oct 2012 12:22:18 +0200
with message-id 20121008102218.ga4...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687196: eucalyptus: Please unblock Eucalyptus
has caused the Debian Bug report #687196,
regarding eucalyptus: Please unblock Eucalyptus
to be marked as done.
This means that
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 22:20:54 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
In addition a number of people on #-mentors suggested that a
Pre-Dependency on dpkg shouldn't be too bad since dpkg should be
upgraded early in any case.
Sounds like a myth to me. Reference?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
severity 689107 normal
Bug #689107 {Done: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
piuparts failures
Bug #688736 {Done: gregor herrmann gre...@debian.org} [release.debian.org]
w3c-linkchecker: modifies conffiles (policy 10.7.3):
On 15/08/2012 15:34, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
the initial release of rush_1.7+dfsg-1 happened a year ago.
The package has a minute user base, but when I returned to the
package recently I happened to notice that there was a clear
mistake in the recording of copyright terms for one of the
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:49:57PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 22:20:54 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
In addition a number of people on #-mentors suggested that a
Pre-Dependency on dpkg shouldn't be too bad since dpkg should be
upgraded early in any case.
Sounds
Your message dated Mon, 8 Oct 2012 13:36:29 +0200
with message-id 20121008113629.ga13...@spike.0x539.de
and subject line Re: Bug#688076: unblock: amd64-microcode/1.20120910-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #688076,
regarding unblock: amd64-microcode/1.20120910-1
to be marked as done.
This means
On 13/09/2012 14:42, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 25/08/12 16:34, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
Hi Release Team,
I plan to take over of python-eventlet . It has a FTBFS bug[1] in Wheezy
due to the bug in python-greenlet [2]. It is fixed, but not migrated to
testing due to an other RC bug[3].
On 28/09/2012 07:57, Alexander Golovko wrote:
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock
Hi!
Please unblock bacula-* packages, it fixes multiple bugs, include
CVE-2012-4430, crashes and debian policy violations:
#687923
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:35:28 +0200
with message-id 5072c890.70...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#685741: unblock: qpid-cpp/0.16-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #685741,
regarding unblock: qpid-cpp/0.16-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 14:54:48 +0200
with message-id 5072cd18.5030...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#689362: unblock: qt-at-spi/0.3.1-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #689362,
regarding unblock: qt-at-spi/0.3.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:24:57 +0200
with message-id 5072d429.5020...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#685456: Freeze exception for kde-gtk-config
has caused the Debian Bug report #685456,
regarding Freeze exception for kde-gtk-config
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 15:30:08 +0200
with message-id 5072d560.1020...@dogguy.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687914: unblock: tupi/0.1+git12-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #687914,
regarding unblock: tupi/0.1+git12-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear Release Team,
Please unblock package gcc-doc-defaults
GCC's documents need an update, as we have gcc-4.6/4.7 as default
version (depends on arch). This upload update manpage/info
Hi Niels,
Thanks for your support.
I comment below.
El sáb, 06-10-2012 a las 11:38 +0200, Niels Thykier escribió:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
On 2012-10-05 10:12, Francisco Manuel Garcia Claramonte wrote:
Subject: unblock: php-letodms-core/3.3.9-1
Package: release.debian.org
User:
Hi Salvatore,
it looks like as some bug in doxygen :(, which includes some invalid
code - maybe it's compiled against new arm architecture and run on
old?
Ccing doxygen maintainer and Aurelien, who might hopefully shed some
light into this...
Ondrej
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 8:32 PM, Salvatore
block 689967 with 689726 689727
thanks
gcc-doc depends on gcc-4.6-doc and gcc-4.7-doc.
Guo Yixuan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
block 689967 with 689726 689727
Bug #689967 [release.debian.org] unblock: gcc-doc-defaults/5:4
689967 was not blocked by any bugs.
689967 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 689967: 689726 and 689727
thanks
Stopping processing
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 14:02 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 13/09/2012 14:42, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
On 25/08/12 16:34, Laszlo Boszormenyi (GCS) wrote:
I plan to take over of python-eventlet . It has a FTBFS bug[1] in Wheezy
due to the bug in python-greenlet [2]. It is fixed, but not migrated to
[ Martin's message didn't reach debian-release@ as, I guess, the
attachment was too big ]
On 07/10/2012 15:47, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
On 2012-10-07 13:16, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
First, we will need a debdiff between testing's version and the one
you want to upload, please.
Attached. (I hate
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package mimedefang
Version 2.73-2 fixes release critical Bug #688196 (piuparts).
It also adds two default options to
/usr/share/mimedefang/mimedefang.conf which is the
Hi,
On 2012-10-06 10:29, Niels Thykier wrote:
Looks reasonable, please go ahead. Please ping us once the patched
fbreader has been in sid for a couple of days.
Thanks and ping.
--
Eugene V. Lyubimkin aka JackYF, JID: jackyf.devel(maildog)gmail.com
C++ GNU/Linux userspace developer, Debian
Quoting Mehdi Dogguy me...@dogguy.org:
I'm not sure. When big, you may gzip it or upload it to somewhere public.
Thanks, will do next time.
80 files changed, 830 insertions(+), 232 deletions(-)
I will try to extract the actual source code changes, so the diff will be
much shorter. Anyway,
Greetings! This was in line of addressing #682719. I was under the
impression that the emacsen would cover the absence of emacs24. Isn't
wheezy frozen anyway?
Take care,
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Hi,
Thanks for fixing #688201. Unfortunately from a very quick look at
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package clamav
This is a new bugfix release of clamav with only a few small, but important
fixes. Additionally, because it increases the clamav FL (functionality level)
the
[re-ordered]
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk writes:
Thanks for fixing #688201. Unfortunately from a very quick look at
the
diff it includes a change which makes it unsuitable for inclusion in
wheezy (and doesn't appear to be documented in the changelog
afaict):
-Depends:
Camm,
am Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:02:52PM -0400 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
Greetings! This was in line of addressing #682719. I was under the
impression that the emacsen would cover the absence of emacs24.
emacs24's forced in from unstable if no emacsen is installed yet. The
bug you cited
Mehdi,
am Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 05:59:19PM +0200 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
[ Martin's message didn't reach debian-release@ as, I guess, the
attachment was too big ]
On 07/10/2012 15:47, W. Martin Borgert wrote:
On 2012-10-07 13:16, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
First, we will need a debdiff
On 06/10/2012 20:24, Georges Khaznadar wrote:
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User:
release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney
I received one week ago an automated e-mail announcing that wims was
removed from testing. The automated information about the reason of
Please binNMU d-i to get an updated netcfg.
Ta.
Mraw,
KiBi.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/ecf1e304-e0da-40cd-958c-49c039513...@email.android.com
Greetings! OK uploading 108 with emacs23.
Take care,
Philipp Kern pk...@debian.org writes:
Camm,
am Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:02:52PM -0400 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
Greetings! This was in line of addressing #682719. I was under the
impression that the emacsen would cover the absence
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:26:09 +0100
with message-id 1349724369.11774.25.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687627: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-account/2.2.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687627,
regarding pre-approve unblock:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:25:33 +0100
with message-id 1349724333.11774.14.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687626: pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/2.2.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687626,
regarding pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/2.2.4-1
to
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:25:37 +0100
with message-id 1349724337.11774.15.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687628: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-account-statement/2.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687628,
regarding pre-approve unblock:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:25:40 +0100
with message-id 1349724340.11774.16.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687631: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-calendar/2.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687631,
regarding pre-approve unblock:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:25:42 +0100
with message-id 1349724342.11774.17.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687633: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-calendar-scheduling/2.2.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687633,
regarding pre-approve unblock:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:25:46 +0100
with message-id 1349724346.11774.18.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687634: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-calendar-todo/2.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687634,
regarding pre-approve unblock:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:26:12 +0100
with message-id 1349724372.11774.26.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687632: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-calendar-classification/2.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687632,
regarding pre-approve unblock:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:25:52 +0100
with message-id 1349724352.11774.20.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687636: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-product/2.2.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687636,
regarding pre-approve unblock:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:25:49 +0100
with message-id 1349724349.11774.19.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687639: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-stock-supply/2.2.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687639,
regarding pre-approve unblock:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:25:59 +0100
with message-id 1349724359.11774.22.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687638: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-stock/2.2.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687638,
regarding pre-approve unblock:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:25:56 +0100
with message-id 1349724356.11774.21.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687691: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-timesheet/2.2.2-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687691,
regarding pre-approve unblock:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 20:26:06 +0100
with message-id 1349724366.11774.24.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#687695: pre-approve unblock:
tryton-modules-party-vcarddav/2.2.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #687695,
regarding pre-approve unblock:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hello release team,
Csound is failing to build due to a new bison uploaded around the
same time csound was uploaded. A patch fixing this could be produced,
but I'm taking a while
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:01:51 +0200
with message-id 5073312f.7020...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#689770: pre-unblock: fbreader/0.12.10dfsg-8
has caused the Debian Bug report #689770,
regarding pre-unblock: fbreader/0.12.10dfsg-8
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 19:22 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Camm,
am Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 12:02:52PM -0400 hast du folgendes geschrieben:
Greetings! This was in line of addressing #682719. I was under the
impression that the emacsen would cover the absence of emacs24.
emacs24's forced in
On 03/10/12 23:47, David R. Townsend wrote:
[...] it would be really helpful to
me to have a Table of Contents (TOC) for my targeted CD set so I can
peruse and figure out what to download and what not. It would be great
to see all the contents at a glance!!!
Hi David,
The *.list.gz files on
[recipient list trimmed, although it should probably be even smaller]
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing
package emacsen with emacs23 | emacsen?
It does exist, in exactly the same way that e.g. mail-transport-agent
does.
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 10:03:01PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Regarding the emacs23 | emacs24 dependency I thought emacs24 would enter
testing. Obviously it did not make it in time. And the patch I submitted
was for acl2, not gcl. Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing
package
one more arm fix got added since,
added it directly in klibc 2.0.1-3,
see belows diff.
Thank you,
--
maks
commit 9472b6159928b14c19ec23f1be704459a630b52a
Author: maximilian attems m...@stro.at
Date: Mon Oct 8 21:58:43 2012 +0200
release 2.0.1-3
diff --git a/debian/changelog
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 21:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
[recipient list trimmed, although it should probably be even smaller]
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing
package emacsen with emacs23 | emacsen?
It does
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:59 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 21:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing
package emacsen with emacs23 | emacsen?
It does exist, in
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tracker
The Evolution email miner in tracker is currently broken. With evo
3.0/3.2 it could lead to evolution hang during startup, with evo 3.4 it
simply does
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package libgda5
The sqlite provider in libgda-5.0-4 uses dlopen() to load the sqlite3
library. As a result, libgda-5.0-4 did not have a dependency on
libsqlite3-0 so it was
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:59 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 21:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
Nevertheless, why build-depend on a non-existing
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 23:26 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:00 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:59 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 21:10 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 22:03 +0200, Svante Signell wrote:
On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 20:39 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Please binNMU d-i to get an updated netcfg.
Scheduled.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
Your message dated Mon, 08 Oct 2012 22:38:33 +0100
with message-id 1349732313.11774.38.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#690003: unblock: libgda5/5.0.3-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #690003,
regarding unblock: libgda5/5.0.3-2
to be marked as done.
This means that
Labdien, Debian-release!
Izlasi šo te noderīgo blogu:
http://giviname.hostei.com/exydebo.html
Publicēta ir tik tiešām interesanta saruna ar čali , kurš gada laikā nopelnīja
lielus finansu līdzekļus.
Tur ir publicēts viņš to nostrādāja - noteikti izlasi un izdari to pašu , ja
gribi būt
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 09:10:24PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 03/10/12 23:47, David R. Townsend wrote:
[...] it would be really helpful to
me to have a Table of Contents (TOC) for my targeted CD set so I can
peruse and figure out what to download and what not. It would be great
to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Dear release team,
I would like to ask for an unblock of
texlive-base/2012.20120611-5
This release attacks mainly fixes regarding the handling of
conffiles. During the passage form
Steve and Steve,
Thank you both VERY much for this information!!!
Best regards,
David Townsend
On Oct 8, 2012, at 8:22 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2012 at 09:10:24PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 03/10/12 23:47, David R. Townsend wrote:
[...] it would be really helpful
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
retitle 688729 unblock xpra/0.3.11+dfsg-1
Bug #688729 [release.debian.org] unblock xpra/0.3.10+dfsg-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock xpra/0.3.11+dfsg-1' from 'unblock
xpra/0.3.10+dfsg-1'
--
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
retitle 688729 unblock xpra/0.3.11+dfsg-1
--
Please unblock package xpra.
unblock xpra/0.3.11+dfsg-1
All upstream 0.3.x releases are bugfix-only.
Upstream changelog as below:
v0.3.11 (2012-10-05)
==
-- fix bencoder to properly handle dicts with non-string keys
Hi Adam,
thanks for the prompt unblocking!
Best wishes
Norbert
Norbert Preiningpreining@{jaist.ac.jp, logic.at, debian.org}
JAIST, Japan TeX Live Debian Developer
DSA:
Your message dated Tue, 09 Oct 2012 05:55:16 +0100
with message-id 1349758516.11774.40.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org
and subject line Re: Bug#690012: unblock: texlive-base/2012.20120611-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #690012,
regarding unblock: texlive-base/2012.20120611-5
to be marked
calendarserver 3.2+dfsg-4 has been uploaded to unstable. Request to
unblock it.
Also, regular updates of calendarserver in wheezy will be pushed through
wheezy-updates as calendarserver has to be updated whenever tz database
is updated at http://www.iana.org/time-zones.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Your message dated Tue, 09 Oct 2012 07:40:39 +0200
with message-id 5073b8d7.4020...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#687189: unblock: calendarserver/3.2+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #687189,
regarding unblock: calendarserver/3.2+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 11:05 +0530, Rahul Amaram wrote:
Also, regular updates of calendarserver in wheezy will be pushed through
wheezy-updates as calendarserver has to be updated whenever tz database
is updated at http://www.iana.org/time-zones.
That's something we can talk about after the
83 matches
Mail list logo
