Processing changes file: stellarium_0.11.3-1+deb7u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vjhj9-0002sw...@franck.debian.org
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as new
upstream release for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works.
Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for CentOS are
different, and just using upstream 1.6
Hi,
Per request, an updated tzdata package was uploaded to p-u, and I wish your
approval for inclusion in stable.
The reason for the upload is the Israe's daylight saving rules have changed
(and already in effect since this Sunday). We'd like to provide a fix for
this situation with the new
On 2013-09-10 9:09, Lior Kaplan wrote:
Per request, an updated tzdata package was uploaded to p-u, and I
wish
your approval for inclusion in stable.
fwiw, we get notified automatically by our tools about new uploads to
p-u; I was expecting tzdata to appear at some point in any case.
Is
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.ukwrote:
On 2013-09-10 9:09, Lior Kaplan wrote:
Is there are a plan for an upload for squeeze?
Would be nice, but we didn't ask for it. Having it in wheezy took long
enough (guess the maintainers were busy). But will
Am 09.09.2013 19:32, schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 21:56:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 09:07:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
With xorg-server being fixed to no longer FTBFS, there is no more
blocker for this transition afaics and we should be ready
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:16:12 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 09.09.2013 19:32, schrieb Julien Cristau:
On Sun, Sep 8, 2013 at 21:56:32 +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 09:07:30 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
With xorg-server being fixed to no longer FTBFS, there
Processing changes file: tzdata_2013d-0wheezy1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vjlto-0008nx...@franck.debian.org
On 2013-09-09 14:10, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2013-09-09 08:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-09-09 7:37, Tomasz Buchert wrote:
On 08/09/13 19:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Please go ahead; thanks.
[...]
just to be sure on that: by go ahead you mean that I can upload
it?
Yes.
It was
On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as new
upstream release for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works.
Upstream version for Debian and the one they do for CentOS
On 10/09/13 14:09, Thomas Goirand wrote:
On 09/10/2013 03:17 PM, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Le 06/09/2013 10:14, Thomas Goirand a écrit :
I wrote it many time to many people. Please don't just read 1.6 as new
upstream release for XCP. That's unfortunately not the way it works.
Upstream version for
Hmm, I'm not having much success in replicating the build environment
for this - however, I did notice two patches in the ubuntu xen-api
package that look relevant. The build failure appears to be related to
xenguest, and there is a patch 'xenguest-4.2.patch' which looks worth a
test. Also, I
Hi Julien,
Am 10.09.2013 11:27, schrieb Julien Cristau:
britney keeps old libs around in testing if they still have reverse
deps. Though I had completely forgotten about the source package name
change in this case, which should make this even easier.
Ok, what does that mean then. Should we
On 10.09.2013 16:07, Jon Ludlam wrote:
Hmm, I'm not having much success in replicating the build environment for
this -
however, I did notice two patches in the ubuntu xen-api package that look
relevant. The build failure appears to be related to xenguest, and there is a
patch
Hi,
As for becoming more upstream-friendly, there are now several of us
working to make that happen. Euan Harris is working hard on actually
creating packages from this work, though the shape of these packages
is quite different from that of the old-style 1.3.2 packages. We
should start a
Sorry for that, I didn't know it's necessary... :(
It's the first time I backport a package.
That won't happen again. :)
Tomasz
On 10/09/13 12:24, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-09-09 14:10, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
On 2013-09-09 08:01, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On 2013-09-09 7:37, Tomasz
On Mon, 2013-07-08 at 21:06 +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
A new release of the tz data (2013d) was made on Friday.
I've now uploaded libdatetime-timezone-perl/1:1.60-1+2013d, which
contains the OlsonDB 2013d, to unstable, and I've prepared an update
for the package in stable as 1.58-1+2013d
On Tue, 2013-09-10 at 10:59 +0200, Lior Kaplan wrote:
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Adam D. Barratt
a...@adam-barratt.org.uk wrote:
Are there any other changes worthy of note in the update? See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-stable-announce/2012/10/msg0.html
for an example
Processing changes file: stellarium_0.11.3-1+deb7u1+b1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1vjtfs-00055c...@franck.debian.org
19 matches
Mail list logo
