Your message dated Sat, 19 Oct 2013 10:14:05 +
with message-id e1vxtxp-0004uv...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#693360: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #693360,
regarding RM: libpam-rsa -- RoST; unmaintained, buggy and dangerous
to be marked as done.
Your message dated Sat, 19 Oct 2013 10:14:51 +
with message-id e1vxtyz-00050t...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#725731: Removed package(s) from oldstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #725731,
regarding RM: irssi-plugin-otr -- RoM; security issues
to be marked as done.
This means
On Sunday, 28. July 2013 12:30:47 Andreas Beckmann wrote:
nmu uucp_1.07-20 . ALL . -m Rebuild with current debhelper to drop
install-info call.
A binNMU is sufficient to fix uucp in sid (#598904).
Ping?
Andreas
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
usemod-wiki uses a hard-coded expiration date for its cookies. That's
silly, but fact is that's now in the past. #726762 has a patch that I
would also like to apply to the wheezy version:
Processing control commands:
tag -1 wheezy
Bug #726807 [release.debian.org] pu: package usemod-wiki/1.0.5-1
Added tag(s) wheezy.
--
726807: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=726807
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Control: tag -1 wheezy
Christoph Berg m...@debian.org (2013-10-19):
usemod-wiki uses a hard-coded expiration date for its cookies. That's
silly, but fact is that's now in the past. #726762 has a patch that I
would also like to apply to the wheezy version:
usemod-wiki (1.0.5-1+deb7u1)
Hi,
I notice some packages migrated into testing (kfreebsd-9, cuse4bsd,
fuse4bsd) but mails didn't go to the maintainer yet and the PTS hasn't
updated.
Am I being too impatient, or did Britney fail to send out mails for
this?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
--
To
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2013-10-19):
I notice some packages migrated into testing (kfreebsd-9, cuse4bsd,
fuse4bsd) but mails didn't go to the maintainer yet and the PTS hasn't
updated.
Am I being too impatient, or did Britney fail to send out mails for
this?
Aren't those
Re: Cyril Brulebois 2013-10-19 20131019133050.gb17...@mraw.org
I assume the upload to unstable is already in the pipes? (We tend to
prefer having fixes uploaded to s-p-u after they're in unstable).
It's on the way, yes.
Given the diff, I guess you could go ahead with an upload to s-p-u right
On 15:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2013-10-19):
I notice some packages migrated into testing (kfreebsd-9, cuse4bsd,
fuse4bsd) but mails didn't go to the maintainer yet and the PTS hasn't
updated.
Am I being too impatient, or did Britney fail to send
On 15:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2013-10-19):
I notice some packages migrated into testing (kfreebsd-9, cuse4bsd,
fuse4bsd) but mails didn't go to the maintainer yet and the PTS hasn't
updated.
Am I being too impatient, or did Britney fail to send
Package: chrony
Severity: serious
Version: 1.24-3+squeeze1
X-Debbugs-Cc: t...@security.debian.org, debian-release@lists.debian.org
The security update for chrony links against libreadline6 on
amd64. However chrony is licensed under GPL-2-only and libreadline6 is
GPL-3-or-later.
The buildd
Christoph Berg m...@debian.org (2013-10-19):
Do I need to put anything special in the distribtution field for that,
or do you just do the cherry-picking for that yourself?
I think it's cherry-picked from s-p-u, so uploading it there should work
on your side.
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
On Sat, 2013-10-19 at 14:47 +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 15:38, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2013-10-19):
I notice some packages migrated into testing (kfreebsd-9, cuse4bsd,
fuse4bsd) but mails didn't go to the maintainer yet and the PTS hasn't
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
# Each of these bugs relates to a stable update that was included in the
6.0.8 point release
limit package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hello,
I would like to provide libgnutls-openssl27 from the gnutls28 source
package (up to date upstream version of GnuTLS). The binary package
name will not change, however the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I have prepared a targeted upload which closes two CVEs.
These are relatively mild security bugs in the embedded copy of libraw
(which cannot be trivially removed, alas).
A debdiff is
17 matches
Mail list logo
