Re: Why doesn't aspectc++ migrate?

2013-11-09 Thread Philipp Kern
On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:49:39PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote: I wonder why the package aspect++ does not migrate. According to http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=aspectc++, it seems to be because of missing arm builds. I expected that not to matter as the package is no

Bug#718767: ocaml_4.01.0-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into experimental

2013-11-09 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Le 09/11/2013 10:32, Hendrik Tews a écrit : Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org writes: Source: ocaml Version: 4.01.0-1 does this mean we skip the 4.00 transition and transition directly to 4.01, when the release team finally approves? Yes. Does this also mean that

Processed: mapnik: FTBFS on mips and mipsel

2013-11-09 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: block 674587 by -1 Bug #674587 [release.debian.org] transition: mapnik 2.0.x 674587 was not blocked by any bugs. 674587 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 674587: 729121 -- 674587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674587 729121:

Replacing openjdk-6 with gcj-jdk as default java for mips{,el}

2013-11-09 Thread Niels Thykier
Hi, (With my Java hat on and my Release hat off) We are getting close to being able to remove openjdk-6 from sid and testing. However, there is major blocker, which is java-common itself (and its default-* binaries). mips and mipsel are the only two architectures still using OpenJDK 6 as

Bug#728992: nmu: smartmontools_6.2+svn3841-1

2013-11-09 Thread Laurent Bigonville
Hi, So I /think/ that smartmontools is the only package affected by this. I tested it the following way (with the libselinux1 package installed on my system): - Download all rdeps .deb files - Unpack them into a directory - Run ldd command on all the .so files and the one with the executable

Re: Replacing openjdk-6 with gcj-jdk as default java for mips{,el}

2013-11-09 Thread Steven Chamberlain
On 09/11/13 13:35, Niels Thykier wrote: At the current time, OpenJDK 7 have not been successfully ported on these architectures and it is my understanding that it is unlikely to change in the near future. It did build in the past, but I guess nobody was around to fix it as things changed

Re: libewf transition and #713364

2013-11-09 Thread Andreas Moog
On 08.11.2013 22:35, Niels Thykier wrote: However, sleuthkit suffers from #713364 which is a FTBFS bug, so I have no reason to believe a binNMU will be successful. [...] Comments welcome, a fix for #713364 in sid (or deferred) even more so. I have taken the 2 patches from upstream that I

Re: Replacing openjdk-6 with gcj-jdk as default java for mips{,el}

2013-11-09 Thread Aurelien Jarno
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 09/11/13 13:35, Niels Thykier wrote: At the current time, OpenJDK 7 have not been successfully ported on these architectures and it is my understanding that it is unlikely to change in the near future. It did build