On Fri, Nov 08, 2013 at 10:49:39PM -0500, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
I wonder why the package aspect++ does not migrate. According to
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=aspectc++, it
seems to be because of missing arm builds. I expected that not to
matter as the package is no
Le 09/11/2013 10:32, Hendrik Tews a écrit :
Debian FTP Masters ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org writes:
Source: ocaml
Version: 4.01.0-1
does this mean we skip the 4.00 transition and transition
directly to 4.01, when the release team finally approves?
Yes.
Does this also mean that
Processing control commands:
block 674587 by -1
Bug #674587 [release.debian.org] transition: mapnik 2.0.x
674587 was not blocked by any bugs.
674587 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 674587: 729121
--
674587: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674587
729121:
Hi,
(With my Java hat on and my Release hat off)
We are getting close to being able to remove openjdk-6 from sid and
testing. However, there is major blocker, which is java-common itself
(and its default-* binaries). mips and mipsel are the only two
architectures still using OpenJDK 6 as
Hi,
So I /think/ that smartmontools is the only package affected by this.
I tested it the following way (with the libselinux1 package installed
on my system):
- Download all rdeps .deb files
- Unpack them into a directory
- Run ldd command on all the .so files and the one with the executable
On 09/11/13 13:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
At the current time, OpenJDK 7 have not been successfully ported on
these architectures and it is my understanding that it is unlikely to
change in the near future.
It did build in the past, but I guess nobody was around to fix it as
things changed
On 08.11.2013 22:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
However, sleuthkit suffers from #713364 which is a FTBFS bug, so I
have no reason to believe a binNMU will be successful.
[...]
Comments welcome, a fix for #713364 in sid (or deferred) even more so.
I have taken the 2 patches from upstream that I
On Sat, Nov 09, 2013 at 07:52:57PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
On 09/11/13 13:35, Niels Thykier wrote:
At the current time, OpenJDK 7 have not been successfully ported on
these architectures and it is my understanding that it is unlikely to
change in the near future.
It did build
8 matches
Mail list logo