Hi,
I uploaded nbd-3.5 yesterday to deal with CVE-2013-6410, but forgot to
adjust the urgency to high. Since testing is vulnerable, this really
ought to be done.
Can you please fix?
Thanks,
--
This end should point toward the ground if you want to go to space.
If it starts pointing toward
On 2013-12-02 9:05, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
I uploaded nbd-3.5 yesterday to deal with CVE-2013-6410, but forgot
to
adjust the urgency to high. Since testing is vulnerable, this
really
ought to be done.
Can you please fix?
$ hint grep nbd
== adsb
# 20131202
age-days 2 nbd/1:3.5-1
Regards
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tags 708401 + pending
Bug #708401 [release.debian.org] transition: suitesparse
Added tag(s) pending.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
708401: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=708401
Processing control commands:
block 704032 with -1
Bug #704032 [release.debian.org] transition: boost-defaults 1.54
704032 was blocked by: 710083 731066 708802 710082 721544 699575 709577 729270
701336 709578 709251 725626 711950 709254 709574 715474 721577 701360 726863
731067 709576 731064
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Afaics, the situation didn't change. There is nobody committing to work on the
toolchain for these architectures. At least for release architectures the
alternative is to drop the port unless somebody wants to maintain the toolchain
for this port. This is the current
Le 2013-11-24 11:02, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
retitle 718767 transition: ocaml 4.01.0
thanks
Le 05/08/2013 10:43, Stéphane Glondu a écrit :
I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.00.1 (released last
November) as soon as possible. It breaks some packages; most of them
have been fixed
Le 02/12/2013 13:54, Mehdi Dogguy a écrit :
I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.00.1 (released last
November) as soon as possible. It breaks some packages; most of them
have been fixed in experimental. As usual, it involves a lot of binNMUs;
I will take care of those.
Now, I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Upstream is releasing a new version of webp soon that has an expanded
API, and therefore will bump soname and package from libwebp4 to
libwebp5. Reverse dependency list appended; I think
Your message dated Mon, 02 Dec 2013 21:05:13 +0100
with message-id 529ce7f9.4010...@thykier.net
and subject line Re: Bug#660409: Rewrite Britney's installability tester in
python
has caused the Debian Bug report #660409,
regarding Rewrite Britney's installability tester in python
to be marked as
On Sat, 2013-11-16 at 14:57 +, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
According to the normal schedule, the point release for 7.3 is due
somewhere around 12th December.
How does everybody look for the weekends of:
14th/5th
21st/22nd
28th/29th December?
Based on the responses so far, if we want to
According to the normal schedule, the point release for 7.3 is due
somewhere around 12th December.
How does everybody look for the weekends of:
14th/5th
21st/22nd
28th/29th December?
Based on the responses so far, if we want to be sure to have an
ftpmaster, SRM and CD-master available
Hi,
I don't know whether it is appropriate that I remark,
I have no objection to moving to gcc-4.8 on ppc64, too.
Matthias Klose wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Afaics, the situation didn't change. There is nobody committing to work on the
toolchain for these architectures. At least
Your message dated Mon, 2 Dec 2013 23:25:42 +0100
with message-id 2013120542.gx4...@betterave.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#706798: transition: Libav 9
has caused the Debian Bug report #706798,
regarding transition: Libav 9
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
Your message dated Mon, 2 Dec 2013 23:26:27 +0100
with message-id 2013120627.gy4...@betterave.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#709039: transition: x264
has caused the Debian Bug report #709039,
regarding transition: x264
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has
Le dimanche 01 décembre 2013 à 18:27 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit :
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 16:17:45 +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
Please schedule a transition for the source package suitesparse. The new
version is currently in experimental. It features a
Processing changes file: links2_2.3~pre1-1+squeeze2_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: links2_2.3~pre1-1+squeeze2_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: links2_2.3~pre1-1+squeeze2_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: links2_2.3~pre1-1+squeeze2_ia64.changes
ACCEPT
Your message dated Mon, 2 Dec 2013 23:49:30 +0100
with message-id 20131202224930.gz4...@betterave.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#724653: transition: libproxy
has caused the Debian Bug report #724653,
regarding transition: libproxy
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
17 matches
Mail list logo
