Bug#754981: RM: rails-3.2/3.2.18-1

2014-07-17 Thread Ondřej Surý
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014, at 22:56, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 16/07/14 16:44, Ondřej Surý wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hi, we are aiming at having only latest rails (or no rails at all)

Bug#755029: transition: libkolabxml

2014-07-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 17/07/14 00:53, Diane Trout wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition libkolabxml has a ABI change, this affects packages generated from it, from libkolab, and from kdepim-runtime.

Processed: Re: Bug#755029: transition: libkolabxml

2014-07-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 confirmed Bug #755029 [release.debian.org] transition: libkolabxml Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 755029: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755029 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email

Bug#754981: marked as done (RM: rails-3.2/3.2.18-1)

2014-07-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 17 Jul 2014 12:37:10 +0200 with message-id 53c7a756.2090...@debian.org and subject line Re: Bug#754981: RM: rails-3.2/3.2.18-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #754981, regarding RM: rails-3.2/3.2.18-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has

please binNMU rakudo against latest parrot

2014-07-17 Thread Dominique Dumont
Hello rakudo is currently uninstallable on amd64 and needs to be re-built with the new version of parrot to fix this. nmu rakudo_2014.03.01-1 . amd64 . -m rebuilt with parrot 6.3.0 (Closes: #749500) Thanks -- https://github.com/dod38fr/ -o- http://search.cpan.org/~ddumont/

Re: Java 9 dropping support for source/target level 1.5

2014-07-17 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
2014-07-16 22:32 GMT+02:00 Miguel Landaeta nomad...@debian.org: It's totally normal to have technical disagreements, especially on a non-trivial packages like that one. What I really dislike is to see epithets like bullshit or own agenda in a technical discussion. +1 -- Arnaud Vandyck

Bug#748535: transition: gnutls28

2014-07-17 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2014-07-12 Andreas Metzler ametz...@bebt.de wrote: there is another binnmu candidate: [...] some new ones: nmu gobby-infinote_0.4.94-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28' nmu pycurl_7.19.3.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28' nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against

Bug#748535: transition: gnutls28

2014-07-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 17/07/14 18:33, Andreas Metzler wrote: nmu gobby-infinote_0.4.94-6 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28' nmu pycurl_7.19.3.1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28' nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28' Scheduled. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

libquazip transition

2014-07-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Hi, I see there's a transition for libquazip. I was going to schedule binNMUs for the rdeps, but the -dev package got renamed from libquazip0-dev to libquazip1-dev, but with the latter providing the former (I guess to allow binnmus). That won't work at least with freemedforms-project because that

Re: please binNMU rakudo against latest parrot

2014-07-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 17/07/14 13:36, Dominique Dumont wrote: Hello rakudo is currently uninstallable on amd64 and needs to be re-built with the new version of parrot to fix this. nmu rakudo_2014.03.01-1 . amd64 . -m rebuilt with parrot 6.3.0 (Closes: #749500) Done, on every arch (not just amd64). You

Bug#755094: transition: harfbuzz

2014-07-17 Thread أحمد المحمودي
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Transition is due to upstream API change: replacement of 'hb_version_check' with 'hb_version_atleast'. The impacted source packages are: webkitgtk texlive-bin

Bug#755096: transition: postgresql-9.4

2014-07-17 Thread Christoph Berg
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, we currently have PostgreSQL 9.3 in unstable/testing. PostgreSQL 9.4.0 will be releasing around September. 9.4~beta1 is already in experimental, and 9.4~beta2 will release next

Bug#755096: transition: postgresql-9.4

2014-07-17 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: To Debian Bug Tracking System 2014-07-17 20140717181223.ga21...@msg.df7cb.de I've tested most of the interesting packages, most of them do not have any issues with 9.4. For a handful, fixes have already been made upstream, pending new releases, and some need some trivial debian/ updating.

Bug#755029: transition: libkolabxml

2014-07-17 Thread Diane Trout
I don't see anything from kdepim-runtime depending on libkolabxml0. It was a transitive dependency, I wasn't sure how far to chase reverse dependencies. This was my first time trying to declare a transition. Diane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Bug#755096: transition: postgresql-9.4

2014-07-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/postgresql-9.4.html On 17/07/14 20:12, Christoph Berg wrote: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi, we currently have PostgreSQL 9.3 in

Processed: Re: Bug#755096: transition: postgresql-9.4

2014-07-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/postgresql-9.4.html Bug #755096 [release.debian.org] transition: postgresql-9.4 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/postgresql-9.4.html'. -- 755096:

Bug#755029: transition: libkolabxml

2014-07-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 17/07/14 19:37, Diane Trout wrote: I don't see anything from kdepim-runtime depending on libkolabxml0. It was a transitive dependency, I wasn't sure how far to chase reverse dependencies. This was my first time trying to declare a transition. No worries, that just means it's even

Bug#755096: transition: postgresql-9.4

2014-07-17 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 2014-07-17 53c8174f.5070...@debian.org Does all the stuff that says todo on the wiki need major work? That means there's a slight chance the package might get confused by catalog changes in the new server, though there's been little change in that area that should be

Bug#753781: Heads up: transition: xserver 1.16

2014-07-17 Thread Petr Salinger
Thanks. I've checked that xserver-xorg-video-nv (non-free, meant for kfreebsd systems) still builds OK with xorg-video-abi-18, xserver-xorg-core (= 2:1.15.99.903). I don't have hardware available to test it with unfortunately. I can confirm that xserver-xorg-video-nv works under

Bug#755096: transition: postgresql-9.4

2014-07-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 17/07/14 20:47, Christoph Berg wrote: Re: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 2014-07-17 53c8174f.5070...@debian.org Does all the stuff that says todo on the wiki need major work? That means there's a slight chance the package might get confused by catalog changes in the

Processed: Re: Bug#755096: transition: postgresql-9.4

2014-07-17 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: tags -1 confirmed Bug #755096 [release.debian.org] transition: postgresql-9.4 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 755096: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=755096 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Bug#755096: transition: postgresql-9.4

2014-07-17 Thread Christoph Berg
Re: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort 2014-07-17 53c8264b.7060...@debian.org Sounds good! Since packages can migrate one by one as you explained, feel free to upload whenever you're ready. Thanks. Fwiw, I think the ben file needs 9. changed to 9\. Atm it is picking up some git commitish version number in

Bug#753529: transition: perl 5.20

2014-07-17 Thread Niko Tyni
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:04:31PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: On 15/07/14 21:28, Niko Tyni wrote: There are currently about 40 bugs open with a patch. I don't expect the count to go down much without an NMU campaign, so we should probably start one. Since we're going to do this

Re: How would you use britney for Kali and are generalization patches welcome?

2014-07-17 Thread Niels Thykier
On 2014-07-16 23:57, Niels Thykier wrote: On 2014-07-16 15:48, Raphael Hertzog wrote: Hello britney maintainers, Hi, :) [...] Short-term options include: * patch Britney reject on first new uninstallable - something like the attached patch, which /vastly/ reduces the

Re: libquazip transition

2014-07-17 Thread Eric Maeker
Le 17/07/2014 19:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : Hi, I see there's a transition for libquazip. I was going to schedule binNMUs for the rdeps, but the -dev package got renamed from libquazip0-dev to libquazip1-dev, but with the latter providing the former (I guess to allow binnmus).

Bug#748535: transition: gnutls28

2014-07-17 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 17/07/14 18:33, Andreas Metzler wrote: nmu xbmc_2:13.1~rc1+dfsg1-1 . ALL . -m 'Rebuild against gnutls28' That one failed everywhere. I have opened a serious bug for it. Emilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?

Re: libquazip transition

2014-07-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 23:35:55 +0200, Eric Maeker wrote: Le 17/07/2014 19:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : May I ask why the -dev package is versioned, instead of simply being libquazip-dev, as I think it should be? As the ABI version of libquazip has a possibility to evolve, I

Bug#755096: transition: postgresql-9.4

2014-07-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 22:42:59 +0300, Christoph Berg wrote: Fwiw, I think the ben file needs 9. changed to 9\. Atm it is picking up some git commitish version number in the haskell-persistent-postgresql dependencies or something like that. Fixed, thanks. Cheers, Julien signature.asc

Re: libquazip transition

2014-07-17 Thread Eric Maeker
Le 18 juil. 2014 à 01:01, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org a écrit : On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 23:35:55 +0200, Eric Maeker wrote: Le 17/07/2014 19:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort a écrit : May I ask why the -dev package is versioned, instead of simply being libquazip-dev, as I think it should