Processing control commands:
tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #773149 [release.debian.org] what to do with x52pro???
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
773149: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773149
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE,
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On 2014-12-17 22:16, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
So I don't think there's much choice, even if it is really nasty...
If you're happy to prepare the dummy packages, please go ahead and let's
see how they turn out.
Upgrade path seems fine now.
The updated udev rules
Hi Adam,
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014, at 21:56, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 16:01 +0100, Ondřej Surý wrote:
this is a preliminary request to unblock php5/5.6.4+dfsg-1 that hasn't
been release yet.
[...]
The option I would like to avoid is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
My last upload of Keystone fixes a few bugs which I would like to get rid of
for Jessie, including:
- Fix for Systemd startup
- Inclusion of keystone.cron.hourly (very important in
(cc-ing a -done address means we never see it, good job you also mailed me)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 05:11:52PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
Hi,
At Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:23:14 +,
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 02:40:47PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Please unblock package libgd2
Hi,
new release with a upstream fix for buffer overflow found by ASAN by
Jan Bee.
Also removing seanius
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:57:24 +
with message-id 20141218125724.gp11...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net
and subject line Re: Bug#773114: pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/3.4.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #773114,
regarding pre-approve unblock: tryton-server/3.4.0-3
to be
Zin in een hartverwarmende pauze?
Geniet van heerlijke koffie en water dankzij Sip-Well!
- Op kantoor of thuis
- Heerlijk water van bronwaterkwaliteit
- Bruisend, gekoeld en warm water
- Met handige 10L flessen
- 14 dagen gratis proefplaatsing
Ontvang gratis een luxe espresso apparaat bij
Uploaded to ftp-master with Distribution: jessie, attaching debdiff for
records:
$ git diff debian/5.3.28-7..debian/5.3.28-7_deb8u1
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index ff3fa07..402263a 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,8 +1,14 @@
+db5.3
Processing control commands:
tag -1 - moreinfo
Bug #773299 [release.debian.org] unblock: python-lightblue/0.3.2-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
773299: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773299
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To
Control: tag -1 - moreinfo
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
In fact, this package should probably be adopted by the python-modules
team. I can make sure that this happens since I'm part of the team. Would
that reassure you?
Ok, it's a deal.
Let me know when it's adopted
Hi,
At Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:40:34 +,
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org wrote:
(cc-ing a -done address means we never see it, good job you also mailed me)
Oh, your right. thanks.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 05:11:52PM +0900, Youhei SASAKI wrote:
Hi,
At Thu, 11 Dec 2014 21:23:14 +,
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package amd64-microcode
This is a freeze policy exception request, for which I apologise.
The package is in non-free, it is a leaf package, and it is system firmware.
This
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:59:45 +
with message-id 1418925585.23220.6.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
and subject line Re: Bug#773448: unblock: libgd2/2.1.0-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #773448,
regarding unblock: libgd2/2.1.0-5
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:57:27 +
with message-id 1418925447.23220.5.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
and subject line Re: Bug#772151: unblock: db5.3/5.3.28-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #772151,
regarding unblock: db5.3/5.3.28-7
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package exim4.
unblock exim4/4.84-5
This is a bugfix only upload, featuring two fixes of important
priority:
* 82_quoted-or-r-2047-encoded.diff pulled from upstream git
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2014 18:19:31 +
with message-id 1418926771.23220.7.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
and subject line Re: Bug#773447: unblock: keystone/2014.1.3-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #773447,
regarding unblock: keystone/2014.1.3-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock the following version of bsd-mailx:
bsd-mailx (8.1.2-0.20141216cvs-1) unstable; urgency=high
* New upstream version from OpenBSD cvs repository. The version consists of:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Please approve an update of intel-microcode in non-free stable (wheezy),
to version 1.20140913.1.
Intel released in 2014-09-13 a new microcode update package, which targets
their Haswell
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
Bug #773458 [release.debian.org] unblock: amd64-microcode/2.20141028.1
Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo.
--
773458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773458
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 14:44 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Please unblock package amd64-microcode
This is a freeze policy exception request, for which I apologise.
The package is in non-free, it is a leaf package, and it is system firmware.
Control: tags -1 + confirmed wheezy
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 17:59 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Please approve an update of intel-microcode in non-free stable (wheezy),
to version 1.20140913.1.
Intel released in 2014-09-13 a new microcode update package, which targets
their
Processing control commands:
tags -1 + confirmed wheezy
Bug #773479 [release.debian.org] pu: package intel-microcode/1.20140913.1
Added tag(s) wheezy and confirmed.
--
773479: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773479
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Your message dated Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:43:17 +
with message-id 20141218224317.gq11...@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net
and subject line Re: Bug#773299: unblock: python-lightblue/0.3.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #773299,
regarding unblock: python-lightblue/0.3.2-2
to be marked as done.
Control: tag -1 pending
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 07:01:29AM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Jonathan Wiltshire 2014-11-07]
Yes, looks ok.
Thanks. The new package is uploaded now.
Flagged for acceptance.
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian
Processing control commands:
tag -1 pending
Bug #730251 [release.debian.org] pu: package shutdown-at-night/0.10+deb7u1
Bug #742481 [release.debian.org] pu: package shutdown-at-night/0.10+deb7u2
Added tag(s) pending.
Added tag(s) pending.
--
730251:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 14:44 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Please unblock package amd64-microcode
This is a freeze policy exception request, for which I apologise.
The package is in
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed wheezy
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 17:59 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Please approve an update of intel-microcode in non-free stable (wheezy),
to version 1.20140913.1.
Intel released in 2014-09-13 a new
tag 773458 - moreinfo
thanks
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed moreinfo
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 14:44 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Please unblock package amd64-microcode
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
tag 773458 - moreinfo
Bug #773458 [release.debian.org] unblock: amd64-microcode/2.20141028.1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
773458:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed wheezy
On Thu, 2014-12-18 at 17:59 -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Please approve an update of intel-microcode in non-free stable (wheezy),
to
Your message dated Fri, 19 Dec 2014 00:14:26 +0100
with message-id 20141218231426.go1...@betterave.cristau.org
and subject line Re: Bug#773478: unblock: bsd-mailx/8.1.2-0.20141216cvs-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #773478,
regarding unblock: bsd-mailx/8.1.2-0.20141216cvs-1
to be marked as
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 18:59:35 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
+ * Change the init script's restart order from { regenerate_config; stop;
+start ; } to { stop; regenerate_config; start ; }. (Thanks, Jakub Warmuz)
+Closes: #768874
Does this mean that, if there's an error in the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi,
I would like to know if the following changes to gcc-mingw-w64 would
be acceptable for Jessie, before uploading the package to unstable;
they fix #773342, a serious bug filed against
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 03:56:33PM +0100, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Please unblock package libspring-java. This package is affected by two
security issues: CVE-2014-3578 (#760733) and CVE-2014-3625 (#769698).
The fix for CVE-2014-3578 is unknown and can't be backported, the only
solution left to
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package pyspf
RC bug fix.
Note: The diff is somewhat cluttered since I chose to upload the fix
in the form of the new upstream release as the RC fix is the only
change from
Le 19/12/2014 01:00, Jonathan Wiltshire a écrit :
Ok, I did some digging. CVE-2014-3578 seems to be unknown to some sources
including NVD. Considering they are both meant to be directory traversal,
I would guess it was a duplicate assignment; let's ignore it for now.
That leaves
Adam D. Barratt [2014-12-15 19:16 +]:
Unblocked, but will as ever need a d-i ack.
It still didn't propagate, I guess the d-i ack didn't happen yet? -8
does not change any udev code or the udebs, so d-i should be rather
unaffected?
Thanks,
Martin
--
Martin Pitt|
38 matches
Mail list logo
