Am 19.06.2015 um 23:36 schrieb Michael Biebl:
Lintian complained about the -2~deb8u1 version, so I uploaded -1+deb8u1
(which happens to be identical to -2 aside from the first line in the
changelog)
Thanks,
Adam.
Emilio rightfully points out, that I'm not actually Adam :-)
So let me try
Am 14.06.2015 um 23:18 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
On Sun, 2015-06-14 at 18:47 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
Am 14.06.2015 um 17:29 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
[...]
Assuming that the intention is to simply rebuild -2 on Jessie, then
-2~deb8u1 would be more self-explanatory (as an additional
CÓPIA EXECUTÁVEL DO AVAST 2015 QUE PERMITE A ATIVAÇÃO COM ZeNiX.
http://www.4shared.com/file/r1M33Yhzce/avast_premier_antivirus_ZeNiX_.html
Acesse http://conv.ly/tonyallbr e aproveite de excelentes programas com serial
de ativação.
Hello Otto, Julien and Adam,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 08:49:25AM +0300, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
Hello!
Ok, thanks for the review. If I revert the two bug fixes commented by
Julien below from the jessie branch, and nobody comments in X days,
then it is OK to upload 10.0.19 to Jessie?
Thanks!
On 18/06/15 09:50, Stéphane Glondu wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Managers and OCaml Maintainers,
I would like to start the transition to OCaml 4.02.2 (released
yesterday) as soon as
On 17/06/15 01:22, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 06/16/2015 01:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 14/06/15 13:28, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 06/14/2015 04:29 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 17:39:14 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg
wrote:
This hasn't been an issue
On 06/19/2015 01:21 PM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 17/06/15 01:22, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 06/16/2015 01:21 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 14/06/15 13:28, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
On 06/14/2015 04:29 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 17:39:14 +0200,
On 06/19/2015 07:14 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 00:26:07 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
In Sid, I added missing systemd .service files to the cloud-init package,
because without them, the ordering when starting cloud-init is completely
wrong. With the default OpenStack
On 06/19/2015 07:14 AM, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 00:26:07 +0200, Thomas Goirand wrote:
In Sid, I added missing systemd .service files to the cloud-init package,
because without them, the ordering when starting cloud-init is completely
wrong. With the default OpenStack
Hello!
Ok, thanks for the review. If I revert the two bug fixes commented by
Julien below from the jessie branch, and nobody comments in X days,
then it is OK to upload 10.0.19 to Jessie?
2015-06-19 8:12 GMT+03:00 Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 00:12:52 +0300,
Hi Julien
On 19/06/2015 07:08, Julien Cristau wrote:
This description of that change is terrible. The symbol is actually
removed by 22-disable-1565.patch, this is removing it from the debian
packaging metadata, not the library...
Also, the way this is handled makes it pretty hard from the
Le 18/06/2015 17:06, Eric Cooper a écrit :
Attached is the list of packages appearing in the tracker, with an
annotation:
- unstable if the package can be binNMUed
- experimental if the package has to be uploaded from experimental
- UNRELEASED if the package has to be uploaded from git
(Moving the discussion to #788533; #756867 bcc'ed)
On 19/06/15 14:40, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
The mips* FTBFS are a recurring problem for the mapnik package, previous
builds were no different. I'll try to get it to build on a porterbox,
but I expect intervention from the buildd admins
13 matches
Mail list logo
