Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1
On 2016-02-06 13:59, Kartik Mistry wrote: > On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:46 PM, Andreas Beckmannwrote: >>> What is the best way to fix this? >> >> Probably reverting the reverted transition, therefore reopening this bug. >> >> You can drop the v5 suffix once upstream bumps the SOVERSION again and >> you have to rename the package anyway. > > I'm preparing fix, Can anyone look at, > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/lttoolbox.git/commit/?id=a3b07fe80d08de83902971f45aab75701bae8cea > and see if it is OK? You have a now useless Breaks: liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5 (<= 3.3.2~r61000-3.1) in there. For the changelog I would say something like "Reinstate the g++-5 ABI transition and renamed packages." Andreas
Bug#814367: transition: x265
Control: tags -1 confirmed On 10/02/16 22:45, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html > > It's this time of the year again. libx265 bumped its SONAME and requires a > transition. All four reverse dependencies build fine against the new version > which is waiting in experimental. Go ahead. Cheers, Emilio
Processed: Re: Bug#814367: transition: x265
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #814367 [release.debian.org] transition: x265 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 814367: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814367 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#814442: jessie-pu: package postgresql-9.1/9.1.20-0+deb8u1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, with today's postgresql-9.1 9.1.20-0+deb7u1 security update in wheezy, the package version in wheezy is now greater than the one in jessie. This no-change (in pl/perl) upload fixes that. diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog index 75248e4..d0934de 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +postgresql-9.1 (9.1.20-0+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium + + * New upstream release: No effective changes for PL/Perl, the version must +just be higher than the one in wheezy. + + -- Christoph BergThu, 11 Feb 2016 15:47:54 +0100 + postgresql-9.1 (9.1.19-0+deb8u1) jessie; urgency=medium * New upstream version, relevant PL/Perl change: Thanks, Christoph -- c...@df7cb.de | http://www.df7cb.de/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#791195: fixed in lttoolbox 3.3.2~r61000-3.1
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Andreas Beckmannwrote: > You have a now useless > > Breaks: liblttoolbox3-3.3-0v5 (<= 3.3.2~r61000-3.1) > > in there. > > For the changelog I would say something like "Reinstate the g++-5 ABI > transition and renamed packages." Breaks field was removed with latest upload. -- Kartik Mistry | IRC: kart_ {0x1f1f, kartikm}.wordpress.com
Bug#814470: nmu: shibboleth-resolver_1.0.0-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu shibboleth-resolver_1.0.0-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against the libstdc++ v5 transitioned shibboleth stack." This doesn't seem to export any symbols affected by the libstdc++ v5 transition (but it needs several of them), so a binNMU should be sufficient in this case, no rename required. Andreas
Bug#814468: marked as done (nmu: gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1)
Your message dated Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:19:05 +0100 with message-id <56bd16e9.5020...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#814468: nmu: gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #814468, regarding nmu: gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 814468: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814468 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1 . i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against gnuradio 3.7.9.1" this was sitting in NEW for several months ... Andreas --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 11/02/16 23:35, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > nmu gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1 . i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against gnuradio 3.7.9.1" > > this was sitting in NEW for several months ... Scheduled. Emilio--- End Message ---
Bug#814475: nmu: vtk-dicom_0.7.1-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu vtk-dicom_0.7.1-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against gdcm 2.6.3" The maintainer uploaded binaries were sitting in NEW for a long time. Requesting ANY instesd of amd64 due to M-A: same packages. Andreas
Bug#814468: nmu: gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu gnss-sdr_0.0.6-1 . i386 . unstable . -m "Rebuild against gnuradio 3.7.9.1" this was sitting in NEW for several months ... Andreas
Bug#814367: transition: x265
On 2016-02-11 09:28:26, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 10/02/16 22:45, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > Control: forwarded -1 > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html > > > > It's this time of the year again. libx265 bumped its SONAME and requires a > > transition. All four reverse dependencies build fine against the new version > > which is waiting in experimental. > > Go ahead. Thanks, uploaded. The builds on mipsel is still missing, but everywhere else it has been built already. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher signature.asc Description: PGP signature