Processing changes file: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.65-1+deb8u1_mips.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: quassel_0.10.0-2.3+deb8u3_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: quassel_0.10.0-2.3+deb8u3_powerpc.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: quassel_0.10.0-2.3+deb8u3_ppc64el.changes
Processing changes file: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.65-1+deb8u1_arm64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.65-1+deb8u1_armel.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.65-1+deb8u1_armhf.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:39:46PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
>Steve McIntyre:
>> [...]
> - armel has a RT concern about lack of buildds (only 2)
>
I think this is outdated, my understanding is that armel and armhf are
now using a shared buildd pool. I see arnold, hoiby,
Processing changes file: libcss-dom-perl_0.15-1+deb8u1_merged.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.65-1+deb8u1_merged.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libquota-perl_1.7.1+dfsg-1+deb8u1_allonly.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #827046 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
libnet-ssleay-perl/1.65-1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
827046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827046
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
Hi,
On Sun, 2016-06-12 at 19:55 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 06:46:17PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-06-12 at 14:14 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > > I would
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #827113 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
libquota-perl/1.7.1+dfsg-1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
827113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827113
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2016-06-11 at 21:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2016-06-11 at 19:37 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > As per #826993 the perl and libencode-perl updates included in the
> > January point release broke CSS::DOM.
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Sat, 2016-06-11 at 21:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Sat, 2016-06-11 at 16:38 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> > As per #789344 the last point release caused libnet-ssleay-perl to
> > FTBFS because of a test suite failure.
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #827058 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package
libcss-dom-perl/0.15-1+deb8u1
Added tag(s) pending.
--
827058: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827058
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:42:51 + Niels Thykier wrote:
^^^
> Francesco Poli:
[...]
> > Could someone prod the FTP masters to analyze the issue and provide an
> > authoritative statement?
> >
> > Thanks for your time.
> >
> >
>
> It seems to me that you just did?
Maybe, but,
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 22:13 +0200, Felix Geyer wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 15:56:35 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt"
> wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> >
> > On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 15:56 +0200, Pierre Schweitzer wrote:
> > > A security issue
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #826429 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package quassel/1:0.10.0-2.3+deb8u2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
826429: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826429
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Steve McIntyre:
> [...]
- armel has a RT concern about lack of buildds (only 2)
>>> I think this is outdated, my understanding is that armel and armhf are
>>> now using a shared buildd pool. I see arnold, hoiby, henze, hasse,
>>> antheil and hartmann recently active on the armel
Philipp Kern:
> On 2016-06-05 12:01, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> * amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el,
>>s390x
>>- *No* blockers at this time from RT, DSA nor security.
>>- s390, ppc64el and all arm ports have DSA concerns.
>
> What is the current DSA
Aurelien Jarno:
> [...]
>
> Here is the current buildd lists and how there are configured:
> - eberlin (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el
> - mipsel-aql-01 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el
> - mipsel-aql-02 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el
> - mipsel-aql-03 (DSAed): mips64el then mipsel
> - mipsel-manda-01
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:19:29AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 00:50:05 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>
> > I should probably add that I don't intend to fix this in
> > testing/unstable. There are probably reverse dependencies that
> > saw those symbols are available and
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #827177 [release.debian.org] transition: qtbase-opensource-src
Added tag(s) confirmed.
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-6-1.html
Bug #827177 [release.debian.org] transition: qtbase-opensource-src
Set Bug
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-6-1.html
On 13/06/16 13:54, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi RT! After a long wait we pushing Qt 5 to unstable again.
It is worth to note that with this transition qtquick1-opensource-src
will no longer build and so we will ask for it's
Great, thanks!
I remember that build failure. It was because of a bug in the latex
packages (missing dependencies IIRC). I'm confident that just trying the
build again would result in a functional build. Can you please trigger a
rebuild (i.e., give it back to the queue)?
Thanks.
On Sun, Jun 12,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 00:50:05 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> I should probably add that I don't intend to fix this in
> testing/unstable. There are probably reverse dependencies that
> saw those symbols are available and then started using them again,
> and so it would break things. But I'm
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 14:06:54 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> + * Improve on NEWS file. Closes: #81834
I'm guessing this is not the right bug number.
Cheers,
Julien
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-CC: Andreas Bombe
On my Debian Jessie machine, I would like to fix the two security issues
in dosfstools that show up in the debsecan report:
24 matches
Mail list logo