NEW changes in stable-new

2016-06-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.65-1+deb8u1_mips.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: quassel_0.10.0-2.3+deb8u3_i386.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: quassel_0.10.0-2.3+deb8u3_powerpc.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: quassel_0.10.0-2.3+deb8u3_ppc64el.changes

NEW changes in stable-new

2016-06-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.65-1+deb8u1_arm64.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.65-1+deb8u1_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.65-1+deb8u1_armhf.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-13 Thread Steve McIntyre
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 07:39:46PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: >Steve McIntyre: >> [...] > - armel has a RT concern about lack of buildds (only 2) > I think this is outdated, my understanding is that armel and armhf are now using a shared buildd pool. I see arnold, hoiby,

NEW changes in stable-new

2016-06-13 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: libcss-dom-perl_0.15-1+deb8u1_merged.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libnet-ssleay-perl_1.65-1+deb8u1_merged.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: libquota-perl_1.7.1+dfsg-1+deb8u1_allonly.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file:

Processed: Re: Bug#827046: jessie-pu: package libnet-ssleay-perl/1.65-1+deb8u1

2016-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #827046 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libnet-ssleay-perl/1.65-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 827046: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827046 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#827113: jessie-pu: package libquota-perl/1.7.1+dfsg-1+deb8u1

2016-06-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending Hi, On Sun, 2016-06-12 at 19:55 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 06:46:17PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Sun, 2016-06-12 at 14:14 +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > > I would

Processed: Re: Bug#827113: jessie-pu: package libquota-perl/1.7.1+dfsg-1+deb8u1

2016-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #827113 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libquota-perl/1.7.1+dfsg-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 827113: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827113 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#827058: jessie-pu: package libcss-dom-perl/0.15-1+deb8u1

2016-06-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2016-06-11 at 21:55 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2016-06-11 at 19:37 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > As per #826993 the perl and libencode-perl updates included in the > > January point release broke CSS::DOM.

Bug#827046: jessie-pu: package libnet-ssleay-perl/1.65-1+deb8u1

2016-06-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Sat, 2016-06-11 at 21:54 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Sat, 2016-06-11 at 16:38 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > As per #789344 the last point release caused libnet-ssleay-perl to > > FTBFS because of a test suite failure. >

Processed: Re: Bug#827058: jessie-pu: package libcss-dom-perl/0.15-1+deb8u1

2016-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #827058 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package libcss-dom-perl/0.15-1+deb8u1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 827058: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827058 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: License incompatibility below RC threshold

2016-06-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 24 Apr 2016 08:42:51 + Niels Thykier wrote: ^^^ > Francesco Poli: [...] > > Could someone prod the FTP masters to analyze the issue and provide an > > authoritative statement? > > > > Thanks for your time. > > > > > > It seems to me that you just did? Maybe, but,

Bug#826429: jessie-pu: package quassel/1:0.10.0-2.3+deb8u2

2016-06-13 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 22:13 +0200, Felix Geyer wrote: > On Sun, 05 Jun 2016 15:56:35 +0100 "Adam D. Barratt" > wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > > > On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 15:56 +0200, Pierre Schweitzer wrote: > > > A security issue

Processed: Re: Bug#826429: jessie-pu: package quassel/1:0.10.0-2.3+deb8u2

2016-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #826429 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package quassel/1:0.10.0-2.3+deb8u2 Added tag(s) pending. -- 826429: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826429 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-13 Thread Niels Thykier
Steve McIntyre: > [...] - armel has a RT concern about lack of buildds (only 2) >>> I think this is outdated, my understanding is that armel and armhf are >>> now using a shared buildd pool. I see arnold, hoiby, henze, hasse, >>> antheil and hartmann recently active on the armel

Re: [Stretch] Status for architecture qualification

2016-06-13 Thread Niels Thykier
Philipp Kern: > On 2016-06-05 12:01, Niels Thykier wrote: >> * amd64, i386, armel, armhf, arm64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, >>s390x >>- *No* blockers at this time from RT, DSA nor security. >>- s390, ppc64el and all arm ports have DSA concerns. > > What is the current DSA

Re: mips64el in testing

2016-06-13 Thread Niels Thykier
Aurelien Jarno: > [...] > > Here is the current buildd lists and how there are configured: > - eberlin (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el > - mipsel-aql-01 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el > - mipsel-aql-02 (DSAed): mipsel then mips64el > - mipsel-aql-03 (DSAed): mips64el then mipsel > - mipsel-manda-01

Bug#827054: jessie-pu: package openssl/1.0.1t-1+deb8u3

2016-06-13 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:19:29AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 00:50:05 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > > I should probably add that I don't intend to fix this in > > testing/unstable. There are probably reverse dependencies that > > saw those symbols are available and

Processed: Re: Bug#827177: transition: qtbase-opensource-src

2016-06-13 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #827177 [release.debian.org] transition: qtbase-opensource-src Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-6-1.html Bug #827177 [release.debian.org] transition: qtbase-opensource-src Set Bug

Bug#827177: transition: qtbase-opensource-src

2016-06-13 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/qtbase-abi-5-6-1.html On 13/06/16 13:54, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition

Bug#827177: transition: qtbase-opensource-src

2016-06-13 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi RT! After a long wait we pushing Qt 5 to unstable again. It is worth to note that with this transition qtquick1-opensource-src will no longer build and so we will ask for it's

Re: boxbackup 0.11.1~r2837-2 migration issue

2016-06-13 Thread Reinhard Tartler
Great, thanks! I remember that build failure. It was because of a bug in the latex packages (missing dependencies IIRC). I'm confident that just trying the build again would result in a functional build. Can you please trigger a rebuild (i.e., give it back to the queue)? Thanks. On Sun, Jun 12,

Bug#827054: jessie-pu: package openssl/1.0.1t-1+deb8u3

2016-06-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 00:50:05 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > I should probably add that I don't intend to fix this in > testing/unstable. There are probably reverse dependencies that > saw those symbols are available and then started using them again, > and so it would break things. But I'm

Bug#827111: jessie-pu: package exim4/4.84.2-2

2016-06-13 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 14:06:54 +0200, Andreas Metzler wrote: > + * Improve on NEWS file. Closes: #81834 I'm guessing this is not the right bug number. Cheers, Julien

Bug#827160: jessie-pu: package dosfstools/3.0.27-1+deb8u1

2016-06-13 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-CC: Andreas Bombe On my Debian Jessie machine, I would like to fix the two security issues in dosfstools that show up in the debsecan report: