Processed: notfound 828572 in tkrat/2.2cvs20100105-true-dfsg-6, unmerging 828572, unblock 827061 with 828572 ...

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> # will do a NMU using openssl 1.0 for stretch
> notfound 828572 tkrat/2.2cvs20100105-true-dfsg-6
Bug #828572 [src:tkrat] tkrat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Bug #844845 [src:tkrat] tkrat: FTBFS: osdep.c:445:40: error: dereferencing 
pointer to incomplete type 'X509 {aka struct x509_st}'
The source tkrat and version 2.2cvs20100105-true-dfsg-6 do not appear to match 
any binary packages
No longer marked as found in versions tkrat/2.2cvs20100105-true-dfsg-6.
No longer marked as found in versions tkrat/2.2cvs20100105-true-dfsg-6.
> unmerge 828572
Bug #828572 [src:tkrat] tkrat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Bug #844845 [src:tkrat] tkrat: FTBFS: osdep.c:445:40: error: dereferencing 
pointer to incomplete type 'X509 {aka struct x509_st}'
Disconnected #828572 from all other report(s).
> unblock 827061 with 828572
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828588 850882 828565 841635 843852 828264 828590 828371 
828610 828527 828599 828341 835794 844664 828233 828555 828291 828398 828237 
828256 828337 828581 828507 828310 828468 844366 844271 828301 843682 828433 
828288 828526 828259 828566 828377 850880 828582 828422 828604 828469 828609 
828382 828455 828082 828274 828385 828458 828539 828255 828438 828462 828320 
828298 828308 828289 828267 828473 828261 844906 828463 828272 828283 828496 
828616 828597 828229 828596 835789 828519 845030 828359 828232 844301 828546 
828504 835793 828304 828435 828388 828415 828339 828246 828509 836419 828440 
835786 828252 844951 828303 828545 828356 828587 828343 844909 844936 828368 
809271 828351 829465 828445 835798 828297 828514 828491 828548 828508 828349 
828395 828344 848681 828420 828361 828387 828443 844213 828248 828393 828534 
828562 844347 828607 828357 828405 828532 828331 828263 828139 835811 828503 
828574 844948 814600 828348 828342 828402 828593 844945 828543 828083 828553 
835804 828407 828444 828442 828608 828447 828561 828399 846113 844904 828290 
828589 828528 828456 828286 828602 828542 835585 828579 828559 828523 828479 
828478 828404 828544 828518 828238 828529 843532 828530 828510 828618 828345 
828372 828467 828430 844836 828240 844345 828512 828302 828306 844663 828367 
828487 828354 828319 828611 844870 828506 828373 844907 828419 828605 828536 
828499 828276 828313 828362 828396 828287 828414 828563 828251 828591 828573 
828369 828494 828600 828410 828318 828254 828307 828278 828317 828476 828434 
828577 844928 828314 828324 835549 828418 828495 844503 828265 828416 828262 
828598 850881 828394 828315 828379 828321 828280 844845 828437 828521 828439 
828390 828613 828592 828383 828493 828454 828389 828282 844877 828403 828614 
845729 828271 828363 828549 828277 828453 828448 828489 828241 828431 835785 
828580 844706 844949 828572 828501 828421 828281 828524 828450 828511 835796 
828300 828257 828492 828239 844311 835790 828409 828576 828594 828569 828516 
828429 828432 828472 828234 828326 828550 829452 844947 828275 828552 844975 
828500 828294 828325 851090 828322 828243 828250 828488 835800 828391 828249 
844815 828502 828465 828457 845106 828293 828127 828474 845016 828230 828558 
828292 828401 828484 828427 828459 828269 828340 828571 828392 828575 844926 
828452 828328 828460 828601 828570 828258 828551 828406 828253 828350 828505 
828285 844931 828568 828541 846769 828335 828620 828461 828615 828323 844234 
828386 828583 828346 828603 828436 828449 828490 828537 828260 828446 828384 
828374 828309 828423 844838 850883 835797 828586 828606 844534 828296 828358 
828564 828364 828585 844920 828531 822380 843988 828305 843871 844018 828336 
828554 828380 827068 828424 828417 844254 828480 828466 828235 828567 828533 
828334 828547 828284 837960 828311 828244 828316 828231 828370 828584 828412 
828517 828347 828270 828242 828485 844916 828400 828375 828295 828556 828578 
828619 835799 828360 828470 828228 828426 844800 808669 828482 828333 828365 
828535 828540 844833 828411 828515 828464 828595 828381 828268 828355 828378 
828538 828397 828612 828428 828497 828366 828352 828279 828330 828338 828617 
828376 828525
827061 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 828572
> severity 828572 important
Bug #828572 [src:tkrat] tkrat: FTBFS with openssl 1.1.0
Severity set to 'important' from 'serious'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
827061: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=827061
828572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=828572
844845: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=844845
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#851191: nmu: gtk-sharp2_2.12.40-1~bpo8+1

[Andreas Beckmann]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu gtk-sharp2_2.12.40-1~bpo8+1 . amd64 . jessie-backports . -m "Rebuild in a 
clean jessie environment."

The gtk-sharp2-gapi is not installable in jessie, obviously the
maintainer upload was not built in jessie.

  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   gtk-sharp2-gapi : Depends: libc6 (>= 2.24) but 2.19-18+deb8u6 is to be 
installed or
  libc6.1 (>= 2.24) but it is not installable or
  libc0.1 (>= 2.24) but it is not installable


Andreas

Processed (with 2 errors): Re: Bug#850447: systemd backport sections only 4K aligned, won't boot with arm64 64K kernel

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> reassign -1 release.debian.org
Bug #850447 [systemd] systemd backport sections only 4K aligned, won't boot 
with arm64 64K kernel
Bug reassigned from package 'systemd' to 'release.debian.org'.
No longer marked as found in versions systemd/230-7~bpo8+2.
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #850447 to the same values 
previously set
> retitle -1 nmu: systemd_230-7~bpo8+2
Bug #850447 [release.debian.org] systemd backport sections only 4K aligned, 
won't boot with arm64 64K kernel
Changed Bug title to 'nmu: systemd_230-7~bpo8+2' from 'systemd backport 
sections only 4K aligned, won't boot with arm64 64K kernel'.
> user -1 release.debian@packages.debian.org
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.

> usertags -1 binnmu
Unknown command or malformed arguments to command.


-- 
850447: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850447
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#851166: nmu: forge_0.9.2-2

[Ghislain Antony Vaillant]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu forge_0.9.2-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with fixed glm"

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (300, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Re: Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug

[James Cowgill]

Hi,

On 12/01/17 14:54, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> I would like to point out that it would be preferable if, in case a patch is 
> preferable over going back to the last know version to work, either Matthias 
> or a mips porter points out which of the two proposed patches is preferable.
> 
> For the time being I'm testing the patch I submited to the bug, but I have no 
> preference over any of them (nor technical grounds to discuss).

Both patches posted in the upstream bug should work. The first one fixes
a bug in the MIPS back end so that local symbols are sorted before
global symbols. This is probably the safer (although larger) patch
because it only touches the MIPS back end to try and bring it into line
with other architectures. The second patch prevents the questionable
local symbols from every appearing (so no sorting is necessary). This
should also be correct, although it will visibly change the contents of
the dynamic symbol table on all arches so I am slightly more
apprehensive because of that.

Side note: the patch you uploaded is not totally correct because it
isn't applied when building cross binutils (__mips__ will not be defined
there).

Thanks,
James



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug

[Sam Hartman]

As a FYI, Matthias wrote to me in IRC just now indicating that  he plans
to upload a patch in the next couple of days.
(He needs to get to the location where he has the right environment
before preparing the upload).

As such, I'm planning on holding off on calling for any votes.

Re: Please dak copy-installer 20170112

[Julien Cristau]

On 01/12/2017 01:37 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Release team, please hint it into testing:
> 
>   urgent debian-installer/20170112
> 
> 
Done.

Cheers,
Julien

Re: Bug#850887: Decide proper solution for binutils' mips* bug

[Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer]

I would like to point out that it would be preferable if, in case a patch is 
preferable over going back to the last know version to work, either Matthias 
or a mips porter points out which of the two proposed patches is preferable.

For the time being I'm testing the patch I submited to the bug, but I have no 
preference over any of them (nor technical grounds to discuss).

Thanks, Lisandro.

-- 
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Please dak copy-installer 20170112

[Joerg Jaspert]

On 14550 March 1977, Cyril Brulebois wrote:

> FTPmasters, please sync the installer from sid to testing:
>   dak copy-installer 20170112

dak copy-installer 20170112

Will copy installer version 20170112 from suite unstable to
testing.
Architectures to copy: i386, amd64, mipsel, ppc64el, mips, s390x, armel, armhf, 
arm64, mips64el
Architectures to skip: 
Installer has been copied successfully.

-- 
bye, Joerg

Re: Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips

[Didier 'OdyX' Raboud]

Le mercredi, 11 janvier 2017, 22.38:33 h CET Sam Hartman a écrit :
> I heard back from doko today.  We can expect a reply tomorrow.  We also
> talked briefly about the issue.

Good. Thanks for this work.

> Realistically, i cannot imagine the TC coming to any final decision on
> something like this in under three weeks.  That timeline seems fairly
> aggressive actually.

Right. It implies that every involved party (Lisandro, the Release Team, 
Matthias, and the TC members) can provide a high bandwidth to that issue.

> However, I think the TC could act much more quickly in an interim
> capacity.

Yes.

> I personally believe that having packages building is a better interim
> state than the status quo.  There are risks to an interim measure.  We
> could have packages in the archive that build but fail to function
> correctly.

Ack.

> Depending on what we do long term, we could end up replacing
> packges currently in Stretch with packages we can no longer rebuild.

The worst case is needing to rebootstrap mips' stretch either from jessie, or 
in a cross-bootstrap situation, right ?

> I personally think that when I weigh those risks against my estimate of
> their probability, I think it makes sense to adopt an interim measure.

I agree.

> Roughly I propose to override the maintainer and permit an NMU to be
> made for this issue.

It would be much preferable if Matthias would accept that patch, or revert to 
the previous working version. But if it needs an NMU, so be it.

(Mid-term, I want to understand how it can make sense to change Debian's
 binutils' tracked branch (2.27→2.28) three days before the transition
 freeze.
)

> The decision stands until the maintainer fixes the bug or Stretch
> releases, or another resolution is passed (presumably with a more
> permanent decision).

Absolutely.

> Yes, that means that the maintainer could reintroduce the bug and revert
> the NMU immediately on the release of Stretch.

Absolutely. I wouldn't support a resolution enforcing that NMU in unstable 
forever. New release cycles are our reset button, really.

> I propose to be very agressive in calling for a vote on the following
> ballot.
> I plan to call for a vote in 24 hours if I get support from at least one
> TC member and no objections from within the TC or release team.

Let this mail be my support !

> Also, within that time, we should hear from doko.  His input may change
> my thinking even for an interim measure.

Yes, absolutely. There was only one mail from Matthias on the #844227, only to 
NAK the NMU, on an RC bug opened since November, his input is long overdue!

> 
> In #850887, the Debian Technical Committee was asked to choose a
> solution for #840227, a bug that prevents a significant number of
> packages from building on the mips architecture.  Given the upcoming
> Stretch freeze, this issue is urgent.
> 
> As an interim measure, using its powers under section 6.1.4 of the
> Debian Constitution, the Technical Committee overrules Matthias
> Klose's decision to revert the NMU of binutils fixing #840227.  The
> committee requests Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer to make a new
> NMU fixing #840227.
> 
> The committee requests the release team to support the interim nature of
> this solution and if a permanent solution is adopted before the release of
> Stretch, to consider including that solution in Stretch even if the freeze
> criteria would not normally permit such consideration.
> 
> In addition, the committee requests the stable release managers for Stretch
> to consider including the eventual upstream solution for this issue into a
> stretch update.
> 
> This interim decision stands until the release of Stretch, until it is
> replaced by resolution, or until the binutils maintainer fixes #840227 in
> some other manner.
> 
> 
> Choice 1:  Approve the Resolution (3:1 majority)
> Choice 2: Reject this Interim Measure
> Choice 3: Further Discussion
> 

I agree with the ballot including Ian's suggestion, and think we should start 
the vote as early as this week-end.

Cheers,
OdyX

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Bug#851151: jessie-pu: package binutils/2.25-5+deb8u1.1

[Steve McIntyre]

On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 01:23:39PM +, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>Package: release.debian.org
>Severity: normal
>Tags: jessie
>User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>Usertags: pu
>
>Hi folks,
>
>Binutils in jessie is building (some) broken packages on arm64,
>particularly those using gold. See #850814 for more details - I've
>scanned the archive for affected packages.
>
>There's a simple fix proposed with a single change backported from
>upstream. I've built and tested 2.25-5+deb8u1.1 locally on amd64 and
>arm64. Debdiff attached.
>
>OK to upload?
>
>Once this is in the archive, we'll need some binnmus scheduling to fix
>the packages in that list in #850814.

Forgot to highlight - I'm not the binutils maintainer but doko has
already acked my patch and said he's happy for me to upload this - see

  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=850814#22

-- 
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
Into the distance, a ribbon of black
Stretched to the point of no turning back

Bug#837458: jessie-pu: package mactelnet/0.4.0-1

[Gianfranco Costamagna]

Control: tags -1 - confirmed
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Thu, 05 Jan 2017 20:06:47 + "Adam D. Barratt"  
wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> 
> On Sun, 2016-09-11 at 19:55 +0200, haakon.nessj...@gmail.com wrote:
> 
> > Request for uploading to stable, as there is posted a CVE for a bug in 
> > mactelnet-client.
> > This update is a backport of the fix that is done upstream, that fixes only 
> > the mentioned bug.
> > 
> > Mor information here: 
> > https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2016-7115
> > and here: https://bugs.debian.org/836320
> 
> +mactelnet (0.4.0-2) stable; urgency=low
> 
> The version should be 0.4.0-1+deb8u1. With that change, please go ahead.
> 

while the version is good, we need some more changes according to the CVE fix 
in github [1]

so I'm removing the confirmed tag and adding moreinfo, haakon please fix and 
remove moreinfo once done.

thanks

G.

[1] 
https://github.com/haakonnessjoen/MAC-Telnet/commit/b69d11727d4f0f8cf719c79e3fb700f55ca03e9a




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Processed: Re: Bug#837458: jessie-pu: package mactelnet/0.4.0-1

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing control commands:

> tags -1 - confirmed
Bug #837458 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package mactelnet/0.4.0-1
Removed tag(s) confirmed.
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #837458 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package mactelnet/0.4.0-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.

-- 
837458: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=837458
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Re: Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips

[Sam Hartman]

> "Ian" == Ian Jackson  writes:


Ian> You should explicitly state whether you want this NMU to be
Ian> DELAYED.

Good point.
I think we don't want a delay.
Updated the ballot in git.

Bug#851151: jessie-pu: package binutils/2.25-5+deb8u1.1

[Steve McIntyre]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: jessie
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

Hi folks,

Binutils in jessie is building (some) broken packages on arm64,
particularly those using gold. See #850814 for more details - I've
scanned the archive for affected packages.

There's a simple fix proposed with a single change backported from
upstream. I've built and tested 2.25-5+deb8u1.1 locally on amd64 and
arm64. Debdiff attached.

OK to upload?

Once this is in the archive, we'll need some binnmus scheduling to fix
the packages in that list in #850814.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.6
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.8.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
diff -u binutils-2.25/debian/changelog binutils-2.25/debian/changelog
--- binutils-2.25/debian/changelog
+++ binutils-2.25/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+binutils (2.25-5+deb8u1.1) stable; urgency=medium
+
+  * NMU
+  * Apply patch from upstream to fix gold on arm64. The ABI specifies
+using a pagesize of 64k for ELF binaries.
+
+ -- Steve McIntyre <93...@debian.org>  Thu, 12 Jan 2017 10:36:22 +
+
 binutils (2.25-5) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Remove '*.rej' files in the source package. Closes: #775679.
diff -u binutils-2.25/debian/patches/series binutils-2.25/debian/patches/series
--- binutils-2.25/debian/patches/series
+++ binutils-2.25/debian/patches/series
@@ -46,0 +47 @@
+gold_arm64_pagesize.patch
only in patch2:
unchanged:
--- binutils-2.25.orig/debian/patches/gold_arm64_pagesize.patch
+++ binutils-2.25/debian/patches/gold_arm64_pagesize.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+commit 3b0357dadaf2366cc418ec725dec55b1cea1a2e7
+Author: Andreas Schwab 
+Date:   Thu Oct 1 12:30:18 2015 +0200
+
+gold: fix ABI pagesize for aarch64
+
+* aarch64.cc (aarch64_info): Set abi_pagesize to 64K.
+
+diff a/gold/aarch64.cc b/gold/aarch64.cc
+--- a/gold/aarch64.cc	2017-01-12 10:43:43.948866937 +
 b/gold/aarch64.cc	2017-01-12 10:44:21.913133322 +
+@@ -2232,7 +2232,7 @@
+   '\0',			// wrap_char
+   "/lib/ld.so.1",	// program interpreter
+   0x40,		// default_text_segment_address
+-  0x1000,		// abi_pagesize (overridable by -z max-page-size)
++  0x1,		// abi_pagesize (overridable by -z max-page-size)
+   0x1000,		// common_pagesize (overridable by -z common-page-size)
+   false,// isolate_execinstr
+   0,// rosegment_gap
+@@ -2259,7 +2259,7 @@
+   '\0',			// wrap_char
+   "/lib/ld.so.1",	// program interpreter
+   0x40,		// default_text_segment_address
+-  0x1000,		// abi_pagesize (overridable by -z max-page-size)
++  0x1,		// abi_pagesize (overridable by -z max-page-size)
+   0x1000,		// common_pagesize (overridable by -z common-page-size)
+   false,// isolate_execinstr
+   0,// rosegment_gap
+@@ -2286,7 +2286,7 @@
+   '\0',			// wrap_char
+   "/lib/ld.so.1",	// program interpreter
+   0x40,		// default_text_segment_address
+-  0x1000,		// abi_pagesize (overridable by -z max-page-size)
++  0x1,		// abi_pagesize (overridable by -z max-page-size)
+   0x1000,		// common_pagesize (overridable by -z common-page-size)
+   false,// isolate_execinstr
+   0,// rosegment_gap
+@@ -2313,7 +2313,7 @@
+   '\0',			// wrap_char
+   "/lib/ld.so.1",	// program interpreter
+   0x40,		// default_text_segment_address
+-  0x1000,		// abi_pagesize (overridable by -z max-page-size)
++  0x1,		// abi_pagesize (overridable by -z max-page-size)
+   0x1000,		// common_pagesize (overridable by -z common-page-size)
+   false,// isolate_execinstr
+   0,// rosegment_gap

Re: Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot Proposal: #850887 binutils mips

[Ian Jackson]

Sam Hartman writes ("Bug#850887: [TIMELY for TC members] Interim Ballot 
Proposal: #850887 binutils mips"):
> [stuff]

Thanks for pushing this issue, for your IMO correct approach to the
process, and for your clear and straightforward communication.

> 
> In #850887, the Debian Technical Committee was asked to choose a
> solution for #840227, a bug that prevents a significant number of
> packages from building on the mips architecture.  Given the upcoming
> Stretch freeze, this issue is urgent.
> 
> As an interim measure, using its powers under section 6.1.4 of the
> Debian Constitution, the Technical Committee overrules Matthias
> Klose's decision to revert the NMU of binutils fixing #840227.  The
> committee requests Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer to make a new
> NMU fixing #840227.

You should explicitly state whether you want this NMU to be DELAYED.

Ian.

-- 
Ian Jackson    These opinions are my own.

If I emailed you from an address @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is
a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.

Please dak copy-installer 20170112

[Cyril Brulebois]

Hi,

FTPmasters, please sync the installer from sid to testing:

  dak copy-installer 20170112


Release team, please hint it into testing:

  urgent debian-installer/20170112


KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Processed: That unblock request got somehow lost

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> unblock 827061 by 851084
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828530 828272 828600 835797 828454 844271 828392 843871 
828546 828531 828362 828502 828504 828366 828271 844366 828422 835796 828368 
844916 828430 828590 828448 828541 828607 828279 835790 841635 828601 828521 
828420 828280 844948 828564 850882 828556 828467 844534 822380 828242 844503 
828407 828373 828505 844301 828389 828428 828598 828237 828230 828540 828597 
828440 828390 844870 844906 828231 828473 843988 844345 828577 828232 828291 
828490 828612 845030 835585 851080 828295 828234 828240 828289 828514 827068 
828374 828449 828345 828587 828450 828283 828388 828506 851091 828578 828233 
828323 828309 828352 845016 828393 828494 828508 828567 828582 846769 828613 
828455 828542 828599 828337 828466 828604 828357 828439 828566 828496 828262 
828379 828256 844909 851082 828252 828378 828491 844347 828356 828432 828583 
828614 844664 828277 828270 828260 828447 828465 828288 851089 828568 828492 
851092 851086 828534 844838 828437 828593 828248 828243 828320 828258 836419 
828228 828304 828391 828452 844706 828486 828354 851081 851090 828482 828278 
828468 844877 828511 828453 828501 828518 828433 828307 828405 814600 828284 
828303 828235 828239 850883 828398 828551 828238 828381 828586 828620 828589 
828250 828395 828333 844254 828340 828549 844936 828435 828384 828562 835785 
828292 828348 828579 828516 843532 828507 828350 835798 828585 845729 835800 
844800 844928 828286 828415 828478 828302 828571 828349 828525 828532 828264 
828254 828313 828427 828519 828517 828617 828325 828300 844663 844845 828572 
828351 828399 828558 850881 828411 851087 828555 828484 828244 828574 828344 
828470 828584 828246 828383 828489 828570 828581 828347 828251 828410 828515 
828358 828608 828550 844311 828594 844975 828529 828533 828588 828479 828611 
828580 835804 828361 828619 828336 828426 828527 828615 828610 828360 835789 
828602 828380 828363 828512 828463 835811 828397 828139 828335 845106 828423 
828526 828359 828474 829452 844907 828536 828500 828554 828460 828265 828553 
828229 828290 828376 828499 828365 828419 844815 837960 828444 828421 828443 
828528 828377 828287 828609 828319 844947 828338 835786 828385 844836 828306 
844926 828298 844904 828539 828127 828559 828249 828274 828285 835793 828596 
828382 828294 828314 828326 828592 828412 828268 835549 828462 828259 828396 
828503 828341 828618 828404 844951 828417 844931 828576 828261 828545 828487 
828403 828547 828318 828355 828414 828297 828255 828575 828563 828524 844949 
828458 844945 828330 828346 828387 828476 828573 828488 828459 808669 828310 
851084 828445 828523 828424 828538 828429 828324 828509 828301 828241 828543 
828342 851083 828464 828409 828400 828083 828591 828595 835794 828315 828535 
828461 828548 828316 828386 828493 828317 844213 828537 828456 828402 828457 
828416 828276 846113 828371 828282 828418 850880 828565 828446 828305 843682 
828616 828401 828552 828603 828331 828434 848681 828367 828497 828321 843852 
828451 828269 828369 844018 828253 828322 828561 828343 828364 828436 828495 
835799 828293 828605 828267 828339 828485 844833 828372 828431 828606 828257 
828334 828442 844234 828438 828394 828469 828082 828544 828311 851085 828406 
828370 809271 828281 828308 828569 828375 828472 851088 828328 844920 828263 
828275 828510 828296 828480 829465
827061 was not blocking any bugs.
Removed blocking bug(s) of 827061: 851084
> unblock 827061 by 828451
Bug #827061 [release.debian.org] transition: openssl
827061 was blocked by: 828530 828510 828618 828372 828345 828467 828430 844836 
828240 828478 828404 828544 828518 828238 828529 843532 828542 835585 828579 
828559 828523 828479 828290 828456 828528 828589 828286 828602 828553 835804 
828444 828407 828442 828561 828399 828447 828608 846113 844904 828342 828348 
814600 828402 828593 844945 828543 828083 828532 828405 851089 828263 828331 
828139 835811 828503 828574 844948 828387 828443 844213 851083 828248 828393 
828534 828357 828562 828607 844347 844503 828262 828416 828265 828598 828324 
828314 835549 828495 828418 828254 828307 828278 828317 828434 828476 828577 
844928 828563 828591 828251 828573 828369 828494 828410 828318 828600 828536 
828499 828276 828313 828362 828396 828287 828414 828611 844870 828506 828373 
844907 828419 828605 828367 844663 828487 828354 828319 828512 844345 828302 
828306 828298 828308 828320 828289 828267 828473 828261 844906 828274 851082 
828458 828385 828438 828539 828255 828462 828604 828422 828469 828609 828382 
828082 828455 828433 828288 828526 828259 828566 851092 828377 850880 828582 
828310 828507 828468 844366 844271 828301 843682 828555 828291 828398 828237 
828256 828337 828581 828341 835794 844664 828233 850882 828588 828565 841635 
843852 828371 828264 828590 828610 828599 828527 828548 828508 828491 828395 
828349 848681 828344 828361 828420 828351 829465 835798 828445 851085 

NEW changes in stable-new

[Debian FTP Masters]

Processing changes file: 
debian-installer-netboot-images_20150422+deb8u4.b2_amd64.changes
  ACCEPT

Bug#851133: nmu: atlas_3.10.3-1 openblas_0.2.19-1

[Sébastien Villemot]

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Dear Release Team,

Please schedule a binNMU of openblas and atlas. The libraries build by these
packages contain some binary objects that are taken from lapack (via the
liblapack-pic package), as reflected by their Built-Using field. They need to
be rebuild against the newly uploaded lapack 3.7.0-1.

nmu atlas_3.10.3-1 openblas_0.2.19-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild against 
LAPACK 3.7.0"

Cheers,

-- 
 .''`.Sébastien Villemot
: :' :Debian Developer
`. `' http://sebastien.villemot.name
  `-  GPG Key: 4096R/381A7594


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature