Bug#864193: unblock: chromium-browser/58.0.3029.96-1

package: release.debian.org user: release.debian@packages.debian.org usertags: unblock Please consider unblocking chromium ahead of the stretch window closing. This updates corrects a single security issue that could lead to remote code execution by visiting a malicious web page. Best

Bug#864189: unblock: systemd/232-25

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi, please consider unblocking systemd. The changes include two fixes for selinux, a fix for a dist-upgrade failure and an important performance regression. None of those should affect

Bug#863519: unblock blockdiag/1.5.3+dfsg-2

retitile 863519: unblock blockdiag/1.5.3+dfsg-5 Hi, Niels 2017-06-04 0:30 GMT+09:00 Niels Thykier : > I am not confident that the "install -d" variant used in the -4 upload > is entirely safe from this symlink attack. Furthermore, it still causes > issues by: > > * It would

Bug#864083: marked as done (unblock: libgcrypt20/1.7.6-2)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Jun 2017 21:29:00 + with message-id <4d0a6a78-53d6-1b69-ffd0-e749a42f4...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#864083: unblock: libgcrypt20/1.7.6-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #864083, regarding unblock: libgcrypt20/1.7.6-2 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#864083: unblock: libgcrypt20/1.7.6-2

Cyril Brulebois (2017-06-04): > I'm missing cryptsetup test cases right now, so I can't tell in a few > minutes. I'll try to add one and/or run this manually on monday, but > not making any promises. At some point, late requests will need to be > punted for r1. Especially given

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 06:53:29PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Kurt Roeckx (2017-06-04): > > So I changed it this instead: > > dh_makeshlibs -a -V --add-udeb="libcrypto1.1-udeb" -Xengines > > > > the shlib files now looks like: > > libcrypto 1.1 libssl1.1 (>= 1.1.0f) > >

Bug#864085: unblock: dnsmasq/2.76-5

On 04/06/17 16:36, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 09:58:44AM +0100, ? wrote: >> The dnsmasq package in testing has a serious problem when dns-root-data is >> installed, due to changes in the format of the dns-root-data files. >> The effect is to

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

Kurt Roeckx (2017-06-04): > So I changed it this instead: > dh_makeshlibs -a -V --add-udeb="libcrypto1.1-udeb" -Xengines > > the shlib files now looks like: > libcrypto 1.1 libssl1.1 (>= 1.1.0f) > libssl 1.1 libssl1.1 (>= 1.1.0f) > udeb: libcrypto 1.1 libcrypto1.1-udeb (>=

Bug#864083: unblock: libgcrypt20/1.7.6-2

Hi, Niels Thykier (2017-06-04): > Ack from here, CC'ing KiBi for a d-i ack - assuming there is still > time. Worst case, we will have to defer it to 9.1. I'm missing cryptsetup test cases right now, so I can't tell in a few minutes. I'll try to add one and/or run this

Bug#864076: marked as done (unblock: distro-info-data/0.36)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Jun 2017 16:45:06 + with message-id and subject line unblock distro-info-data has caused the Debian Bug report #864076, regarding unblock: distro-info-data/0.36 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#864027: unblock: swift/2.10.2-1

Hi, 2017-06-04 16:55 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wiltshire : > Let's defer this, I'm not comfortable with such changes this close to > release. > so let's wait for p-u and first stretch point release? -- Best regards Ondřej Nový Email: n...@ondrej.org PGP: 3D98 3C52 EB85 980C 46A5

Bug#864085: unblock: dnsmasq/2.76-5

Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 09:58:44AM +0100, ? wrote: > The dnsmasq package in testing has a serious problem when dns-root-data is > installed, due to changes in the format of the dns-root-data files. > The effect is to render dnsmasq unusable. Bother. > There are several

Processed: Re: Bug#864085: unblock: dnsmasq/2.76-5

Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #864085 [release.debian.org] unblock: dnsmasq/2.76-5 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 864085: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864085 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#864092: marked as done (unblock: llvm-toolchain-3.8)

Your message dated Sun, 4 Jun 2017 16:14:10 +0100 with message-id <20170604151410.jcfukosmjumvb...@powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#864092: unblock: llvm-toolchain-3.8 has caused the Debian Bug report #864092, regarding unblock: llvm-toolchain-3.8 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#864152: marked as done (unblock: msgpuck/1.0.3-1.1)

Your message dated Sun, 4 Jun 2017 16:11:05 +0100 with message-id <20170604151105.sygj4izgm2bxo...@powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#864152: unblock: msgpuck/1.0.3-1.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #864152, regarding unblock: msgpuck/1.0.3-1.1 to be marked as done. This means that

Bug#864091: marked as done (unblock: ettercap/1:0.8.2-5)

Your message dated Sun, 4 Jun 2017 16:03:12 +0100 with message-id <20170604150312.uuc3cslqtmvqp...@powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#864091: unblock: ettercap (CVE) has caused the Debian Bug report #864091, regarding unblock: ettercap/1:0.8.2-5 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#864084: marked as done (unblock: zabbix/1:3.0.7+dfsg-3)

Your message dated Sun, 4 Jun 2017 16:01:29 +0100 with message-id <20170604150129.jxkv65qx6bmy3...@powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#864084: unblock: zabbix/1:3.0.7+dfsg-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #864084, regarding unblock: zabbix/1:3.0.7+dfsg-3 to be marked as done. This means

Processed: retitle 864091 to unblock: ettercap/1:0.8.2-5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 864091 unblock: ettercap/1:0.8.2-5 Bug #864091 [release.debian.org] unblock: ettercap/1:0.8.2-5 Ignoring request to change the title of bug#864091 to the same title > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Bug#864027: unblock: swift/2.10.2-1

Control: tag -1 wontfix Hi, On Sat, Jun 03, 2017 at 01:43:54PM +0200, Ondřej Nový wrote: > This is pre-approval. Please allow unblock of package swift/2.10.2-1 > > This is new upstream STABLE (minor version) release. This is only backports of > fixies from master. I removed 3 patches: > -

Processed: Re: Bug#864027: unblock: swift/2.10.2-1

Processing control commands: > tag -1 wontfix Bug #864027 [release.debian.org] unblock: swift/2.10.2-1 (pre-approval) Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 864027: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864027 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#864048: Bug#861031: mate-desktop-environment: several minor updates to various MATE 1.16 components

HI Vlad, hi Niels, On So 04 Jun 2017 14:14:49 CEST, Vlad Orlov wrote: Hi, This is great, I see all the listed packages are now in Unstable, and all unblock requests are approved. The marco/1.16.1-1 unblock approval is still missing. Niels even lowered the migration delay to 2-3 days

Processed: Re: Bug#864088: unblock (pre-approval): sqlite3/3.6.12-4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 - moreinfo Bug #864088 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): sqlite3/3.6.12-4 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 864088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864088 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#864088: unblock (pre-approval): sqlite3/3.6.12-4

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 11:20:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo > > László Böszörményi (GCS): > > Package: release.debian.org > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: unblock > > > > Hi Release Team, > >

Processed: retitle 864091 to unblock: ettercap/1:0.8.2-5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 864091 unblock: ettercap/1:0.8.2-5 Bug #864091 [release.debian.org] unblock ettercap/1:0.8.2-5 Changed Bug title to 'unblock: ettercap/1:0.8.2-5' from 'unblock ettercap/1:0.8.2-5'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if

Processed: retitle 864091 to unblock ettercap/1:0.8.2-5

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 864091 unblock ettercap/1:0.8.2-5 Bug #864091 [release.debian.org] unblock: ettercap (CVE) Changed Bug title to 'unblock ettercap/1:0.8.2-5' from 'unblock: ettercap (CVE)'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you

Bug#864152: unblock: msgpuck/1.0.3-1.1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi Please unblock package msgpuck It fixes CVE-2016-9036 (Invalid handling of map16 format in mp_check()), which is #849212. unblock msgpuck/1.0.3-1.1 Full debdiff against version in

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 11:09:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Kurt Roeckx: > > [...] > >> > >> Maybe file this as an RC bug against openssl so that it isn't forgotten > >> about, but ignore it for r0? > > > > So I have prepared an update. Should I upload it? > > > > [...] > > > > > > Kurt >

Bug#864065: unblock: mate-themes/3.22.11-1

Hi, Thanks for unblocking. This is really a good improvement over version 3.22.6. We (upstream devs) have been testing various themes from the package, and with each next version they definitely get better. :)

Re: Coordinating Debian Stretch & Tails 3.0 releases?

Hi, intrigeri: > Tails 3.0 will be released either on June 13 or on June 17. We've decided to release Tails 3.0 on June 13: we have to release _something_ on that day anyway (Firefox security update), so moving the Tails 3.0 release to June 17 would have added a substantial amount of work on our

Bug#864088: unblock (pre-approval): sqlite3/3.6.12-4

Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo László Böszörményi (GCS): > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Hi Release Team, > > I would like to upload a security related update for sqlite3. It contains: > - Prevent a possible NULL pointer

Processed: Re: Bug#864088: unblock (pre-approval): sqlite3/3.6.12-4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #864088 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): sqlite3/3.6.12-4 Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo. -- 864088: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864088 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

Kurt Roeckx: > [...] >> >> Maybe file this as an RC bug against openssl so that it isn't forgotten >> about, but ignore it for r0? > > So I have prepared an update. Should I upload it? > > [...] > > > Kurt > Ack from here, so if KiBi is ok with it, then please go ahead. Thanks, ~Niels

Bug#863472: unblock: openssl/1.1.0f-1

On Sun, Jun 04, 2017 at 05:29:21AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > Niels Thykier (2017-06-03): > > Kurt Roeckx: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: unblock > > > Severity: normal > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I've

Bug#864091: unblock: ettercap (CVE)

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi Release Team Please unblock package ettercap, we fixed CVE 2017-8366 unblock ettercap/1:0.8.2-5 debdiff attached diff -Nru ettercap-0.8.2/debian/changelog ettercap-0.8.2/debian/changelog ---

Bug#864092: unblock: llvm-toolchain-3.8

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi Release Team Please unblock package llvm-toolchain-3.8, we fixed the Julia build (bad arm64 generated code), and also fixed a sanitizer hang on newer kernels (it is an upstream patch, it might be

Bug#864088: unblock (pre-approval): sqlite3/3.6.12-4

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hi Release Team, I would like to upload a security related update for sqlite3. It contains: - Prevent a possible NULL pointer dereference in the OP_Found opcode that can follow an OOM error. Problem found

Bug#864085: unblock: dnsmasq/2.76-5

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package dnsmasq The dnsmasq package in testing has a serious problem when dns-root-data is installed, due to changes in the format of the dns-root-data files. The effect is

Bug#864084: unblock: zabbix/1:3.0.7+dfsg-3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Affects: -1 zabbix X-Debbugs-CC: j...@debian.org Please unblock zabbix/1:3.0.7+dfsg-3 I would like to accommodate two attached diffs to Stretch please. One fixes defunctional UI (broken

Bug#864083: unblock: libgcrypt20/1.7.6-2

Control: tags -1 confirmed d-i Andreas Metzler: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package libgcrypt20, the upload features the following > changes: > * Refresh debian/upstream/signing-key.asc,

Processed: Re: Bug#864083: unblock: libgcrypt20/1.7.6-2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed d-i Bug #864083 [release.debian.org] unblock: libgcrypt20/1.7.6-2 Added tag(s) confirmed and d-i. -- 864083: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864083 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#864083: unblock: libgcrypt20/1.7.6-2

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libgcrypt20, the upload features the following changes: * Refresh debian/upstream/signing-key.asc, key-expiry-dates bumped. * Pull two fixes from gcrypt 1.7.7 bugfix

Bug#864067: marked as done (unblock: plasma-workspace/5.8.6-2.1)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Jun 2017 07:15:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#864067: unblock: plasma-workspace/5.8.6-2.1 has caused the Debian Bug report #864067, regarding unblock: plasma-workspace/5.8.6-2.1 to be marked as done.

Bug#864067: unblock: plasma-workspace/5.8.6-2.1

Hi, 2017-06-04 15:00 GMT+09:00 Niels Thykier : > Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo > > Nobuhiro Iwamatsu: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: unblock >> >> Hi, >> >> I want to upload a NMU of

Bug#864049: marked as done (unblock: mate-desktop/1.16.2-2)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Jun 2017 06:07:00 + with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#864049: unblock: mate-desktop/1.16.2-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #864049, regarding unblock: mate-desktop/1.16.2-2 to be marked as done. This means

Bug#864068: marked as done (unblock: debian-edu-doc/1.921~20170603)

Your message dated Sun, 04 Jun 2017 06:02:00 + with message-id <44228efe-0025-21fa-6bce-23a464213...@thykier.net> and subject line Re: Bug#864068: unblock: debian-edu-doc/1.921~20170603 has caused the Debian Bug report #864068, regarding unblock: debian-edu-doc/1.921~20170603 to be marked as

Processed: Re: Bug#864067: unblock: plasma-workspace/5.8.6-2.1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #864067 [release.debian.org] unblock: plasma-workspace/5.8.6-2.1 Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo. -- 864067: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864067 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#864067: unblock: plasma-workspace/5.8.6-2.1

Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Nobuhiro Iwamatsu: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Hi, > > I want to upload a NMU of plasma-workspace to unstable fixing an issue > where processing stopped in ksplashqml

Processed: Re: Bug#864076: unblock: distro-info-data/0.36

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Bug #864076 [release.debian.org] unblock: distro-info-data/0.36 Added tag(s) moreinfo and confirmed. -- 864076: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=864076 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Bug#864076: unblock: distro-info-data/0.36

Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo Stefano Rivera: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > > Please unblock package distro-info-data > > This is a pre-upload unblock request for distro-info-data, now that the >