Bug#864911: stretch-pu: package desktop-base/9.0.3+deb9u1

2017-06-16 Thread Aurélien COUDERC
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear release team, I’d like to push a fix for desktop-base bug #862228 that makes some wallpapers unavailable by default due to a syntax error in their XML descriptor. This fix

Bug#864910: jessie-pu: package debconf/1.5.56+deb8u1

2017-06-16 Thread Colin Watson
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: jessie User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu I'd like to cherry-pick the fix to #863479 into jessie in order to reduce stderr noise in upgrades to stretch. The single commit on top of the current version in jessie follows.

Processed: user release.debian....@packages.debian.org, usertagging 864005, tagging 864005

2017-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org (was a...@adam-barratt.org.uk). > usertags 864005 + unblock There were no usertags set. Usertags are now: unblock. > tags 864005 + stretch Bug

Re: firefox-esr: no longer using system nspr, nss, sqlite?

2017-06-16 Thread Mike Hommey
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 04:09:12PM +0100, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Hi, > > firefox-esr since 52.2.0esr-1 is no longer using the system libs for > nspr, nss, sqlite; was that an intentional change? > > This affects at least sid (where DIST="stretch"): >

Re: firefox-esr: no longer using system nspr, nss, sqlite?

2017-06-16 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Mike Hommey wrote: > Look at the build dependencies in debian/control.in, specifically the > versions, and the versions of the mentioned libraries in jessie and > stretch. Yep, the required versions are not there. Okay, intentional then. Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org

Bug#864907: marked as done (unblock: gnuplot/5.0.5+dfsg1-7, CVE-2017-9670)

2017-06-16 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 16 Jun 2017 21:57:12 +0100 with message-id <47c12e8f83da45eafcc3171a3a9eb...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#864907: unblock: gnuplot/5.0.5+dfsg1-7, CVE-2017-9670 has caused the Debian Bug report #864907, regarding unblock: gnuplot/5.0.5+dfsg1-7, CVE-2017-9670 to be

Bug#864907: unblock: gnuplot/5.0.5+dfsg1-7, CVE-2017-9670

2017-06-16 Thread Anton Gladky
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: security upstream patch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package gnuplot it fixes CVE-2017-9670. The fix is trivial. Patch is attached. unblock gnuplot/5.0.5+dfsg1-7 The diff is attached. Thanks

firefox-esr: no longer using system nspr, nss, sqlite?

2017-06-16 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, firefox-esr since 52.2.0esr-1 is no longer using the system libs for nspr, nss, sqlite; was that an intentional change? This affects at least sid (where DIST="stretch"): https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=firefox-esr=amd64=52.2.0esr-1=1497417448=0 (see "NSPR selection...

Re: Last last installation guide upload?

2017-06-16 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On 2017-06-14 10:47, Samuel Thibault wrote: Hello, Cyril Brulebois, on mar. 13 juin 2017 09:09:31 +0200, wrote: Holger Wansing (2017-06-12): > > Source: installation-guide > Maybe we want another upload for this? > We got a nearly fully up-to-date manual for Chinese

Re: Bug#864597: upgrade-reports: jessie -> stretch: gnome fails to upgrade: cycle found while processing triggers

2017-06-16 Thread Niels Thykier
Cyril Brulebois: > Niels Thykier (2017-06-15): >> Guillem and I have been talking about this over IRC and have a theory. >> >> Basically, jessie's verison of desktop-file-utils and shared-mime-info >> have "-await" triggers (implicit) which will push other packages into a >>

Re: Bug#864597: upgrade-reports: jessie -> stretch: gnome fails to upgrade: cycle found while processing triggers

2017-06-16 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Emmanuel Bourg (2017-06-15): > Is this the only solution? Probably not, but reverting the single change that triggered the regression looks like a safe way to unbreak this situation. Especially when the said change only happened many months after the relevant package was