Bug#863734: unblock: gnupg2/2.1.18-8

On Sat 2017-09-23 19:46:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 23:07 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> I've built this against a stretch system and tested it on a stretch >> system, and it still works. >> >> Please advise me whether i should make an upload. > > With a

Bug#874580: stretch-pu: package waagent/2.2.14-1~deb9u1

Yes Am 25. September 2017 22:35:33 MESZ schrieb "Adam D. Barratt" : >On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 13:27 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:43:56AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: >> > > (Also, we prefer if the full diff is included in pu bugs >> > >

Bug#874580: stretch-pu: package waagent/2.2.14-1~deb9u1

On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 13:27 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:43:56AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > (Also, we prefer if the full diff is included in pu bugs > > > directly.) > > > >  README.md  |  39 ++- > >  

Bug#876510: transition: oce

oce is successfully built in sid on all relevant platforms. Cheers Anton 2017-09-23 15:49 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort : > > Go ahead. > > Emilio

Re: Scheduling 9.3

On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 05:38:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Hi, > >Our target for 9.3 and 8.10 is the first weekend in December (this happily >makes the following target the beginning of February, avoiding the festive >season). > >Accordingly I'm looking at one of: > >25th November >2nd

Bug#875777: stretch-pu: package ecl/15.3.7+dfsg1-2+deb9u1

On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 05:25:15PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 02:45:16PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > I have prepared a stretch-pu for ecl. The debdiff is attached. It simply > > fixes > > #873091 by adding the dependency on libffi-dev. > > Please go

Bug#876732: marked as done (release.debian.org: hunspell-ca 3.0.2+repack1-2 not migrated to testing for unknown reasons)

Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:45:59 +0100 with message-id <2361e5e69b70b20cb3dd8550c3c03...@mail.adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#876732: release.debian.org: hunspell-ca 3.0.2+repack1-2 not migrated to testing for unknown reasons has caused the Debian Bug report #876732,

Bug#876732: release.debian.org: hunspell-ca 3.0.2+repack1-2 not migrated to testing for unknown reasons

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hi, hunspell-ca 3.0.2+repack1-2 is 17 days old but did not yet migrate to testing. Excuses are missing builds for different arches, e.g., missing build on amd64: myspell-ca (from

Re: Scheduling 9.3

On 2017-09-24 17:38, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Accordingly I'm looking at one of: 25th November 2nd December 9th December (but preferably earlier, or we start gradually extending the cycle) Of course the 25th would be a terrible choice and I should have realised that; that

Bug#876731: stretch-pu: package osinfo-db/0.20170225-3~deb9u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I'd like to update osinfo-db in stretch. This would allow us to have up to date information for operating system installs with e.g. gnome-boxes by adding new data for recent

Bug#871469: transition: ocaml

On 23/09/2017 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is someone from the ocaml team handling these, or should I? I am handling these. Cheers, -- Stéphane

Processed: tagging 868558

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 868558 - wontfix Bug #868558 [release.debian.org] transition: r-api-3.4 Removed tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 868558: