Bug#863734: unblock: gnupg2/2.1.18-8
On Sat 2017-09-23 19:46:42 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 23:07 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> I've built this against a stretch system and tested it on a stretch >> system, and it still works. >> >> Please advise me whether i should make an upload. > > With a slightly more definite changelog stanza, please go ahead. :-) Thanks, I've uploaded. --dkg
Bug#874580: stretch-pu: package waagent/2.2.14-1~deb9u1
Yes Am 25. September 2017 22:35:33 MESZ schrieb "Adam D. Barratt": >On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 13:27 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:43:56AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: >> > > (Also, we prefer if the full diff is included in pu bugs >> > > directly.) >> > >> > README.md | 39 ++- >> > azurelinuxagent/agent.py | 52 ++- >> > >... >> > 119 files changed, 5634 insertions(+), 1288 deletions(-) >> >> >> Find attached the full diff gzip'd. > >Thanks. > >That appears to be missing a changelog stanza for the stable upload. Is >that the only proposed difference from the 2.2.14-1 unstable upload? > >Regards, > >Adam -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
Bug#874580: stretch-pu: package waagent/2.2.14-1~deb9u1
On Wed, 2017-09-20 at 13:27 +0200, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > On Wed, Sep 20, 2017 at 11:43:56AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > (Also, we prefer if the full diff is included in pu bugs > > > directly.) > > > > README.md | 39 ++- > > azurelinuxagent/agent.py | 52 ++- > > ... > > 119 files changed, 5634 insertions(+), 1288 deletions(-) > > > Find attached the full diff gzip'd. Thanks. That appears to be missing a changelog stanza for the stable upload. Is that the only proposed difference from the 2.2.14-1 unstable upload? Regards, Adam
Bug#876510: transition: oce
oce is successfully built in sid on all relevant platforms. Cheers Anton 2017-09-23 15:49 GMT+02:00 Emilio Pozuelo Monfort: > > Go ahead. > > Emilio
Re: Scheduling 9.3
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 05:38:51PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: >Hi, > >Our target for 9.3 and 8.10 is the first weekend in December (this happily >makes the following target the beginning of February, avoiding the festive >season). > >Accordingly I'm looking at one of: > >25th November >2nd December >9th December (but preferably earlier, or we start gradually extending > the cycle) > >Please advise your availability. The 25th is really difficult with the Cambridge mini-debconf that weekend, but the other two should be fine. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com "I suspect most samba developers are already technically insane... Of course, since many of them are Australians, you can't tell." -- Linus Torvalds
Bug#875777: stretch-pu: package ecl/15.3.7+dfsg1-2+deb9u1
On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 05:25:15PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: > On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 02:45:16PM +0200, Sébastien Villemot wrote: > > I have prepared a stretch-pu for ecl. The debdiff is attached. It simply > > fixes > > #873091 by adding the dependency on libffi-dev. > > Please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄ http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Bug#876732: marked as done (release.debian.org: hunspell-ca 3.0.2+repack1-2 not migrated to testing for unknown reasons)
Your message dated Mon, 25 Sep 2017 12:45:59 +0100 with message-id <2361e5e69b70b20cb3dd8550c3c03...@mail.adam-barratt.org.uk> and subject line Re: Bug#876732: release.debian.org: hunspell-ca 3.0.2+repack1-2 not migrated to testing for unknown reasons has caused the Debian Bug report #876732, regarding release.debian.org: hunspell-ca 3.0.2+repack1-2 not migrated to testing for unknown reasons to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 876732: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=876732 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hi, hunspell-ca 3.0.2+repack1-2 is 17 days old but did not yet migrate to testing. Excuses are missing builds for different arches, e.g., missing build on amd64: myspell-ca (from 3.0.2+repack1-1) ... but its binary packages are arch:all. The only thing happening in this upload was the removal of obsolete (and also arch:all) transitional myspell-ca package (#874556). Am I hitting a corner case with migration scripts? or I am the one to blame? Thanks in advance, Regards, -- Agustin --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On 2017-09-25 12:23, Agustin Martin wrote: hunspell-ca 3.0.2+repack1-2 is 17 days old but did not yet migrate to testing. Excuses are missing builds for different arches, e.g., missing build on amd64: myspell-ca (from 3.0.2+repack1-1) ... but its binary packages are arch:all. dak adds arch:all packages to each of the other binary architectures packages files. The only thing happening in this upload was the removal of obsolete (and also arch:all) transitional myspell-ca package (#874556). Am I hitting a corner case with migration scripts? or I am the one to blame? myspell-ca needs to be removed from unstable. That isn't happening currently because it still has a reverse-dependency: # Broken Depends: debian-parl: parl-desktop-world You can check this for yourself by running "dak rm -Rn -b myspell-ca" on the ftp-master mirror, or via https://ftp-master.debian.org/cruft-report-daily.txt Regards, Adam--- End Message ---
Bug#876732: release.debian.org: hunspell-ca 3.0.2+repack1-2 not migrated to testing for unknown reasons
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hi, hunspell-ca 3.0.2+repack1-2 is 17 days old but did not yet migrate to testing. Excuses are missing builds for different arches, e.g., missing build on amd64: myspell-ca (from 3.0.2+repack1-1) ... but its binary packages are arch:all. The only thing happening in this upload was the removal of obsolete (and also arch:all) transitional myspell-ca package (#874556). Am I hitting a corner case with migration scripts? or I am the one to blame? Thanks in advance, Regards, -- Agustin
Re: Scheduling 9.3
On 2017-09-24 17:38, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote: Accordingly I'm looking at one of: 25th November 2nd December 9th December (but preferably earlier, or we start gradually extending the cycle) Of course the 25th would be a terrible choice and I should have realised that; that leaves the other two. Thanks, -- Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51 SaaS == Saunas as a Service broonie, more like Sauna as additional Storage
Bug#876731: stretch-pu: package osinfo-db/0.20170225-3~deb9u1
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: stretch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, I'd like to update osinfo-db in stretch. This would allow us to have up to date information for operating system installs with e.g. gnome-boxes by adding new data for recent centos, ubuntu and freebsd releases as well as updating existing ones. This version also included all our debian/patches/. Since it's a new upstream version I've attached the full diff. Note that osinfo-db was split out from libosinfo to facilitate this kind of upgrades. O.k. to upload to stretch-p-u? Cheers, -- Guido -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'testing-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'oldoldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.13.0-trunk-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index 6ff9b5c..1846f7a 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -1,7 +1,11 @@ VPATH = . -TODAY = $(shell date +"%Y%m%d") +ifdef SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH +TODAY = $(shell date --utc --date="@$(SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH)" +"%Y%m%d") +else +TODAY = $(shell date +"%Y%m%d") +endif OSINFO_DB_EXPORT = osinfo-db-export OSINFO_DB_IMPORT = osinfo-db-import @@ -27,6 +31,8 @@ ARCHIVE = osinfo-db-$(TODAY).tar.xz ZANATA = zanata-cli +XMLLINT = xmllint + V = 0 V_I18N = $(V_I18N_$(V)) @@ -79,7 +85,7 @@ clean: rm -f $(DATA_FILES) $(SCHEMA_FILES) po/POTFILES.in po/osinfo-db.pot po/POTFILES.in: - $(V_GEN) find data -name *.xml.in > $@ + $(V_GEN) find data -name *.xml.in | LC_ALL=C sort > $@ po/osinfo-db.pot: po/POTFILES.in $(DATA_FILES_IN) $(V_GEN) cd po && $(INTLTOOL_UPDATE) --gettext-package $(GETTEXT_PACKAGE) --pot @@ -114,3 +120,10 @@ update-po: fi; \ done +check: $(DATA_FILES) $(SCHEMA_FILES) + for xml in `find data -name '*.xml' | sort`; do \ + if ! $(XMLLINT) --relaxng data/schema/osinfo.rng --noout $$xml; then \ + exit 1; \ + fi; \ + done + diff --git a/README b/README index b2822cb..9f2f3af 100644 --- a/README +++ b/README @@ -17,6 +17,21 @@ Dependencies - Required: - osinfo-db-tools - intltool +- Optional: + - xmllint (from libxml2) -- for testing + +Build reproducibility += + +To build libosinfo reproduciblity, you should export the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH[0] +environment variable to the build system. For example: + +$ export SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH="$(date +%s)" +$ ./configure [...] +$ make +[...] + +[0] https://reproducible-builds.org/specs/source-date-epoch/ Patch submissions = diff --git a/data/install-script/fedoraproject.org/fedora-kickstart-desktop.xml.in b/data/install-script/fedoraproject.org/fedora-kickstart-desktop.xml.in index 6f53299..bdc9f5d 100644 --- a/data/install-script/fedoraproject.org/fedora-kickstart-desktop.xml.in +++ b/data/install-script/fedoraproject.org/fedora-kickstart-desktop.xml.in @@ -176,13 +176,13 @@ useradd -G wheel # Add user if test -z ''; then passwd -d # Make user account passwordless else -echo |passwd --stdin +echo '' |passwd --stdin fi if test -z ''; then passwd -d root # Make root account passwordless else -echo |passwd --stdin root +echo '' |passwd --stdin root fi # Set user avatar diff --git a/data/install-script/opensuse.org/opensuse-autoyast-desktop.xml.in b/data/install-script/opensuse.org/opensuse-autoyast-desktop.xml.in index 04399b5..6554eb6 100644 --- a/data/install-script/opensuse.org/opensuse-autoyast-desktop.xml.in +++ b/data/install-script/opensuse.org/opensuse-autoyast-desktop.xml.in @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform; version="1.0"> - + @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ true - resume=/dev/vda1 splash=silent quiet showopts +resume=/dev/vda1 splash=silent quiet showopts false false false @@ -215,18 +215,16 @@
Bug#871469: transition: ocaml
On 23/09/2017 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: That's alright. I see this is already started and binNMUs are needed. Is someone from the ocaml team handling these, or should I? I am handling these. Cheers, -- Stéphane
Processed: tagging 868558
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 868558 - wontfix Bug #868558 [release.debian.org] transition: r-api-3.4 Removed tag(s) wontfix. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 868558: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=868558 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems