Bug#877374: stretch-pu: shadow 1:4.4-4.1+deb9u1
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 5:14 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 08:04:48 +0200, Balint Reczey wrote: > >> shadow (1:4.4-4.1+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium >> . >>* Revert adding pts/0 and pts/1 to securetty. >> Adding pts/* defeats the purpose of securetty. Let containers add it if >> needed as described in #830255. > > I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the regression risk for users from > this one. How long have those been listed in securetty? It was added in 1:4.4-2 since 2017-01-19 to 2017-09-27 when 1:4.5-1 reverted it. Cheers, Balint
Bug#882827: stretch-pu: package python-mimeparse/0.1.4-3.1~deb9u1
On 2018-01-13 18:23, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > On 2018-01-13 17:44, Julien Cristau wrote: >> Are these things flagged by lintian nowadays? > > Nope :-( > So I filed #887083 As lamby pointed out, this is triggered on the source package: $ lintian python-mimeparse_0.1.4-3.dsc W: python-mimeparse source: mismatched-python-substvar python3-mimeparse ${python:Depends} Andreas
Processed: tagging 877593
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 877593 - moreinfo Bug #877593 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package ocfs2-tools/1.8.4-4+deb9u1 Removed tag(s) moreinfo. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 877593: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877593 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#884711: stretch-pu: package dpdk/16.11.4-1+deb9u1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Luca, On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 14:46:04 +, Luca Boccassi wrote: > DPDK maintains LTS branches upstream for 2 years [1]. This is covered > by regressions tests from Intel and AT&T on various networking hardware > and virtualized environments.These tests are run to validate the > release branch before tagging a new version. Other hardware vendors > regularly test these LTS versions too. They are also used by other > distros such as RedHat and Ubuntu. > Only bug fixes that affect that release branch, and that have already > been merged in the mainline, are allowed. No API/ABI changes of any > kind are allowed. Full changelog can be found at the bottom of the > release notes [2]. > Each major mainline release is followed by an LTS branch release, where > the relevant bug fixes are backported, so there are usually 4 bugfix > LTS releases per year. There are usually between 10 and 100 patches > backported per release. > > Stretch shipped with the first release of 16.11. Since then, there have > been 4 bugfix LTS releases, up to 16.11.4 a few days ago. > We have uploaded them to unstable/testing/stretch-backports. > > We would like to take advantage of the upstream LTS maintenance and > push these point releases to Stretch. > > Attached is the full debdiff. I can provide a debdiff for each > individual point release between 16.11 and 16.11.4 if required. > There is only one change in dependency, python-elftools was demoted > from Recommends to Suggests as it's not useful in most cases. I think > this change is fine but can remove it if asked. > > Patches to fix bugs reported on Ubuntu, and to make the build > reproducible, are also included. I can remove them if asked. > > The changelog is inlined at the bottom. > > Although the main users are Debian users with custom software, there is > a reverse build-dep in Stretch as well, collectd. It works fine with > the new LTS version. > Thanks for the detailed explanation, that helps. A few comments: - I'd rather do without the changes in debian/control - likewise init script, pkg-config file (unless there's an explanation) - the above doesn't seem to address the changes in debian/patches/, can you detail the reason behind each of those? - I think from our perspective the reproducibility changes are adding more risk than anything else, and normally not appropriate for stable - the change in prep-modules, generating dependencies on the exact version of linux-image rather than the ABI (probably with ">=" the build version), looks wrong. I don't know if/how that is used by the package though. - the debian/rules changes introduce noise, so if that can be trimmed down it would be welcome - I can't speak to the upstream changes, but no objection in principle if that stuff is tested as you describe. Is any of the LTS branch testing done in a Debian stable environment, either by upstream, you, or some other users of this code? Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#884711: stretch-pu: package dpdk/16.11.4-1+deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #884711 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package dpdk/16.11.4-1+deb9u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 884711: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884711 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#877593: Acknowledgement (stretch-pu: package ocfs2-tools/1.8.4-4+deb9u1)
On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 05:20:06PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > I'm worried about the risk of regressions for users who already worked > around the bug or otherwise changed the links, e.g. to disable those > services. The updated postinst checks if the service is still enabled in rcS and only than does the update so it should only make changes for users with the default installation. -- Valentin
Bug#884561: stretch-pu: package pam-krb5-migrate/0.0.11-4
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 22:19:00 +0100, Dominik George wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Hi, > > I would like to update pam-krb5-migrate in stretch to fix #873271. > > Right now, the package is unusable because it installs files to the > wrong directories. > Hi Dominik, Care to provide the binary debdiff as well? Also, when did this break? Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#884561: stretch-pu: package pam-krb5-migrate/0.0.11-4
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #884561 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package pam-krb5-migrate/0.0.11-4 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 884561: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884561 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#884483: stretch-pu: package xrdp/0.9.1-9+deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #884483 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package xrdp/0.9.1-9+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 884483: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884483 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#884483: stretch-pu: package xrdp/0.9.1-9+deb9u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 19:41:29 +0100, Dominik George wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Hi, > > I'd like to update xrdp in stretch for two important bugs: > > 1. #882463, CVE-2017-16927: Local DoS > Security team says it's not critical enough for stretch-security and I > should instead > target stretch-pu (although I disagree). > > 2. #884453, High CPU load in ssl_tls_accept > Remote users could use up quite a lot or all system resources by keeping > TLS contexts > in a certain state. > Looks ok, please go ahead. Cheers, Julien
Bug#884452: stretch-pu: package python-evtx/0.5.3b-3+deb9u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:28:21 +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Dear release team, > > please consider allowing an update to the python-evtx package in > stretch. It fixes Python3 dependencies (RC bug #867428). > Please go ahead. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#884452: stretch-pu: package python-evtx/0.5.3b-3+deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #884452 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package python-evtx/0.5.3b-3+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 884452: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884452 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#884111: stretch-pu: package vdirsyncer/0.14.1-1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 15:53:28 +0100, Filip Pytloun wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Hello, > > I would like to upload vdirsyncer 0.14.1-2 containing fix for bug #883299 > [1][2][3]. This fixes critical issue that's making vdirsyncer 0.14.1 unusable > for > some users as it's unable to sync Google contacts. > The version number should be 0.14.1-1+deb9u1. With that fixed, and assuming the updated package is tested in stretch, please go ahead. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#884451: stretch-pu: package libvhdi/20160424-1+deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #884451 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package libvhdi/20160424-1+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 884451: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884451 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#884451: stretch-pu: package libvhdi/20160424-1+deb9u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 11:28:16 +0100, Hilko Bengen wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Dear release team, > > please consider allowing an update to the libvhi package in stretch. It > fixes missing Python3 dependencies (RC bug #867409). > Looks ok, please go ahead. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#884111: stretch-pu: package vdirsyncer/0.14.1-1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #884111 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package vdirsyncer/0.14.1-1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 884111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884111 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#882827: stretch-pu: package python-mimeparse/0.1.4-3.1~deb9u1
On 2018-01-13 17:44, Julien Cristau wrote: >> Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) >> >> {+Depends: python3:any (>= 3.3.2-2~)+} > Are these things flagged by lintian nowadays? Nope :-( So I filed #887083 Andreas
Re: kdepim 17.08.3 and kde-l10n
Dear release team, On domenica 31 dicembre 2017 14:24:20 CET Pino Toscano wrote: > On domenica 31 dicembre 2017 14:03:56 CET Sandro Knauß wrote: > > Hey, > > > > I added the release team list, cause they may help explaining interpret the > > britney output. > > And help to find the right buttons to push, to get kdepim migrating to > > testing. > > > > > > I tried to understand, why kdepim hasn't moved to testing, but I don't > > > > understand the britney output completely. > > > > > > I don't either, but let's see. > > > > well I looked at the documentation to understand the output better: > > https://release.debian.org/doc/britney/short-intro-to-migrations.html > > > > But still I'm not completely sure how to interpret the output :D > > If I'm not wrong, than the first try to install complete kdepim as one set > > is the one we should care about: > > > > trying: kleopatra libkf5libkleo kmail-account-wizard libkf5pimcommon > > akonadi-contacts kf5-kdepim-apps-libs kaddressbook akonadi-search > > akonadi-mime libkf5mailcommon pim-data-exporter libkf5libkdepim > > libkf5eventviews libkf5calend > > arsupport kholidays kalarmcal kcalcore kdepim-runtime kmbox kmime > > kf5-messagelib kmailtransport akonadi-import-wizard kdepim-addons kimap > > kpimtextedit kidentitymanagement mbox-importer korganizer kcontacts ktnef > > kcalutils libkol > > ab akonadi kalarm kmail libkf5ksieve libkf5gravatar -kdepim kldap > > syndication kblog akregator libkf5grantleetheme kontact pim-sieve-editor > > libkf5incidenceeditor akonadi-calendar blogilo knotes > > akonadi-calendar-tools libkf5mailim > > porter akonadi-notes akonadiconsole libkgapi > > > > > > skipped: kleopatra libkf5libkleo kmail-account-wizard libkf5pimcommon > > akonadi-contacts kf5-kdepim-apps-libs kaddressbook akonadi-search > > akonadi-mime libkf5mailcommon pim-data-exporter libkf5libkdepim > > libkf5eventviews libkf5calen > > darsupport kholidays kalarmcal kcalcore kdepim-runtime kmbox kmime > > kf5-messagelib kmailtransport akonadi-import-wizard kdepim-addons kimap > > kpimtextedit kidentitymanagement mbox-importer korganizer kcontacts ktnef > > kcalutils libko > > lab akonadi kalarm kmail libkf5ksieve libkf5gravatar -kdepim kldap > > syndication kblog akregator libkf5grantleetheme kontact pim-sieve-editor > > libkf5incidenceeditor akonadi-calendar blogilo knotes > > akonadi-calendar-tools libkf5maili > > mporter akonadi-notes akonadiconsole libkgapi (6, 1706, 170) > > > > > > got: 39+0: a-2:i-24:a-0:a-0:a-0:m-0:m-3:m-0:p-0:s-10 > > > > > > * s390x: education-desktop-kde, kde-full, kde-standard, kdepim, > > kf5-kdepimlibs-kio-plugins, knotes, konsolekalendar, korganizer, > > task-pkgs-are-installable-faux > > > > - splitting the component into single items and retrying them > > > > If I compare the trying line with all packages inside kdepim i see, that > > grantlee-editor, kdav, kgpg and kontactinterface are missing in that list. > > kdav is already migrated. From kgpg and grantlee-editor nothing depends on, > > so we can skip them. > > The only missing package we care at this migration is kontactinterface, > > that explains, why korganizer, knotes will be uninstallable in testing. > > Maybe it is easier to see these dependencies in graphs: > > https://pkg-kde.alioth.debian.org/applications-17.08-build-deps.html > > Because both depend on kontactinterface. > > And because korganzier >= 17.08 won't be in testing konsolecalender can't > > migrate, because it breaks against korganzier <= 17.08. > > education-desktop-kde, kde-full, kde-standard look fine for me, possible, > > because of korganzier and knotes not migrating having issues. > > kdepim, kf5-kdepimlibs-kio-plugins both getting unstallable is fine, cause > > they should be removed form testing. > > What I noticed earlier is that kde-standard unconditionally depends on > kmail and akregator, and thus migrating them will make kde-standard > uninstallable on some architectures -- I just fixed it in git. > Also, I noticed that knotes, konsolekalendar and korganizer > unconditionally depend on kdepim-runtime, so migrating them (together > with kdepim-runtime as it breaks older versions of them), will make > them uninstallable on some architectures -- I fixed them in git too. > > So I'm waiting for src:meta-kde (which provides kde-standard) to > migrate in testing, to
Bug#883963: stretch-pu: package xchain/1.0.1-9~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 21:21:27 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Let's fix the dependency problem of xchain in stretch, too. #878090 > It calls /usr/bin/wish, therefore it needs to depend on wish and not > tk8.5 (which no longer provides the generic wish binary, that's tk8.6 > realm now). > Was there a reason for the version-specific tk dependency? Was xchain tested with wish 8.6? Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#883963: stretch-pu: package xchain/1.0.1-9~deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #883963 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package xchain/1.0.1-9~deb9u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 883963: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883963 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#883952: stretch-pu: package activity-log-manager/0.8.0-1.2~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 20:23:18 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Let's fix the missing dependency on python-zeitgeist, #881438, by > rebuilding the corresponding fixed package from sid. > Go ahead. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#883959: stretch-pu: package cappuccino/0.5.1-8~deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #883959 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package cappuccino/0.5.1-8~deb9u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 883959: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883959 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#883959: stretch-pu: package cappuccino/0.5.1-8~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 20:52:45 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Let's fix the missing dependency on gir1.2-gtk-3.0, #879848, by > rebuilding the package from sid. This also adds a > /usr/games/cappuccino -> ../bin/cappuccino > symlink. > The latter doesn't seem necessary, and even less so in stable. Cheers, Julien
Bug#883897: stretch-pu: package congress/4.0.0+dfsg1-3 -> +deb9u1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 00:30:01 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Dear release team, > > congress-server was built with openstack-pkg-tools *before* it stopped using > /sbin/route from net-tools. Therefore, it's using /usr/sbin at setup time > even though net-tools isn't a runtime dependency. > > So I would like to upload a rebuild of Congress to Stretch, so its > maintainer scripts would not need net-tools anymore. This would fix #858693. > > Of course, since I am not planning any modification to the package, I have > no debdiff to show (it would only contain a new changelog entry, which isn't > very useful to review). > If the rebuild makes a difference, then please show what that difference actually is? Possibly that means a binary debdiff in addition to the normal source diff. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#883897: stretch-pu: package congress/4.0.0+dfsg1-3 -> +deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #883897 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package congress/4.0.0+dfsg1-3 -> +deb9u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 883897: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883897 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#883952: stretch-pu: package activity-log-manager/0.8.0-1.2~deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #883952 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package activity-log-manager/0.8.0-1.2~deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 883952: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883952 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Help on meta-kde and kde-baseapps migration
Dear release team, some days ago I uploaded src:meta-kde and src:kde-baseapps to unstable, and the things that "ties" them is that the kde-baseapps metapackage from src:kde-baseapps (in preparation of the future removal of it) to src:meta-kde. OTOH, they have not migrated to testing for the last 4 days, and I do not understand what is going on, and why they do not migrate to testing. Can you please help for this? Thanks, -- Pino Toscano signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processed: Re: Bug#883854: stretch-pu: package mate-polkit/1.16.0-2+deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #883854 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package mate-polkit/1.16.0-2+deb9u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 883854: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883854 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#883854: stretch-pu: package mate-polkit/1.16.0-2+deb9u1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 12:17:33 +0100, Mike Gabriel wrote: > Whenever mate-polkit asks for the user's password to change the user > context via PolicyKit, an icon is shown in the system tray. > > In Debian stretch, this icon is broken. It should show dialog-password. > The attached .debdiff fixes that. > > Please consider an ACK to get this change into the next point release of > Debian 9. > The bug severity is "minor". I'm not convinced that qualifies. Cheers, Julien
Bug#883879: marked as done (release.debian.org: Upgrade to linux-image-4.9.0-4-amd64 version in stable-proposed-updates prompts upgrade to version of linux-cpupower in stable-backports)
Your message dated Sat, 13 Jan 2018 18:01:11 +0100 with message-id <20180113170111.vcrmxfvr5oejb...@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#883879: release.debian.org: Upgrade to linux-image-4.9.0-4-amd64 version in stable-proposed-updates prompts upgrade to version of linux-cpupower in stable-backports has caused the Debian Bug report #883879, regarding release.debian.org: Upgrade to linux-image-4.9.0-4-amd64 version in stable-proposed-updates prompts upgrade to version of linux-cpupower in stable-backports to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 883879: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883879 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: release.debian.org Severity: minor linux-cpupower version in stable is 4.9.51-1 which corresponds to the kernel currently in stable that will be upgraded in a few days. I upgraded a day early or two early. I did upgrade the package with no problems. This is just a heads up for anyone that this my concern. Thanks -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.3 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.9.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 10:42:03 -0800, CJanisch wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: minor > > linux-cpupower version in stable is 4.9.51-1 which corresponds to the kernel > currently in stable that will be upgraded in a few days. I upgraded a day > early > or two early. I did upgrade the package with no problems. This is just a heads > up for anyone that this my concern. > Probably due to your pinning configuration that prefers backports over proposed-updates? We don't seem to have had any other reports of this, so I'll close it. Thanks for your feedback. Cheers, Julien--- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#882827: stretch-pu: package python-mimeparse/0.1.4-3.1~deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 = confirmed stretch Bug #882827 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package python-mimeparse/0.1.4-3.1~deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 882827: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882827 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#883483: stretch-pu: package flatpak/0.8.8-0+deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #883483 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package flatpak/0.8.8-0+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 883483: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=883483 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#883483: stretch-pu: package flatpak/0.8.8-0+deb9u1
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 at 17:51:04 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 15:45:40 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > > The upstream maintainer of Flatpak has made a 0.8.8 release > > > Assuming this has been tested on stretch, please go ahead. Thanks, uploaded. smcv
Bug#883483: stretch-pu: package flatpak/0.8.8-0+deb9u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 15:45:40 +, Simon McVittie wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > The upstream maintainer of Flatpak has made a 0.8.8 release, which > collects the patches we apply to 0.8.7 in stretch, together with some > more fixes backported from the 0.10.x branch. I would like to update > stretch to this release. > Assuming this has been tested on stretch, please go ahead. Cheers, Julien
Bug#882827: stretch-pu: package python-mimeparse/0.1.4-3.1~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 = confirmed stretch On Sat, Jan 13, 2018 at 17:44:10 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > Woops wrong tag. Cheers, Julien
Bug#882826: stretch-pu: package python-hacking/0.11.0-2.1~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 03:51:31 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Let's fix the python3 dependencies. #867431 > > $ debdiff python3-hacking_0.11.0-2_all.deb > python3-hacking_0.11.0-2.1~deb9u1_all.deb > File lists identical (after any substitutions) > > Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) > > Depends: [-pyflakes,-] {+pyflakes3,+} python3-flake8 (>= 3.0.0), python3-pbr > (>= 1.8), python3-pep8 (>= 1.5.7), python3-six (>= [-1.9.0)-] {+1.9.0), > flake8, python3-mccabe, python3-pycodestyle, python3-pyflakes, python3:any > (>= 3.3.2-2~)+} > Version: [-0.11.0-2-] {+0.11.0-2.1~deb9u1+} > OK, please go ahead. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#882827: stretch-pu: package python-mimeparse/0.1.4-3.1~deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #882827 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package python-mimeparse/0.1.4-3.1~deb9u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 882827: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882827 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#882822: stretch-pu: package python-hkdf/0.0.3-3~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 02:22:54 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Let's fix the python3 dependencies. #867433 > (And by just rebuilding the package from sid, > we get some metadata updates as well.) > Please go ahead. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#882826: stretch-pu: package python-hacking/0.11.0-2.1~deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #882826 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package python-hacking/0.11.0-2.1~deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 882826: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882826 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#882822: stretch-pu: package python-hkdf/0.0.3-3~deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #882822 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package python-hkdf/0.0.3-3~deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 882822: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882822 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#882827: stretch-pu: package python-mimeparse/0.1.4-3.1~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 04:05:26 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Let's fix the python3 dependencies. #867439 > > $ debdiff python3-mimeparse_0.1.4-3_all.deb > python3-mimeparse_0.1.4-3.1~deb9u1_all.deb > File lists identical (after any substitutions) > > Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) > > {+Depends: python3:any (>= 3.3.2-2~)+} > Installed-Size: [-24-] {+25+} > Version: [-0.1.4-3-] {+0.1.4-3.1~deb9u1+} > Go ahead. Are these things flagged by lintian nowadays? Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#882821: stretch-pu: package cerealizer/0.8.1-2~deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #882821 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package cerealizer/0.8.1-2~deb9u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 882821: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882821 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#882821: stretch-pu: package cerealizer/0.8.1-2~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 02:12:32 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Let's fix the python3 dependencies. #867396 > > There is a bit patch noise due to the maintainer switch from svn to git, > but therefore it's just a rebuild of the package from sid. > The dependency change is good, the rest doesn't seem necessary. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#882819: stretch-pu: package python-spake2/0.7-3~deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #882819 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package python-spake2/0.7-3~deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 882819: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882819 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#882819: stretch-pu: package python-spake2/0.7-3~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 02:00:48 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Let's fix the python3 dependencies. #867457 > OK. Cheers, Julien
Processed: tagging 882697
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 882697 = moreinfo stretch Bug #882697 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package apparmor/2.11.0-3+deb9u1 Removed tag(s) pending and confirmed. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 882697: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882697 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#882815: stretch-pu: package exam/0.10.5-2~deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #882815 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package exam/0.10.5-2~deb9u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 882815: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882815 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#882813: stretch-pu: package python-pyperclip/1.5.27-3~deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #882813 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package python-pyperclip/1.5.27-3~deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 882813: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882813 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#882815: stretch-pu: package exam/0.10.5-2~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:43:26 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > Tags: stretch > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: pu > > Fixing up the python dependencies. > > The debdiff is a bit noisy due to the renaming of the patches ... > but therefore it's just a rebuild of the package from sid. > Any reason to not just fix the bug and avoid the patch renaming? Cheers, Julien
Bug#882434: stretch-pu: package ust/2.9.0-2+deb9u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 15:05:52 -0500, Michael Jeanson wrote: > The attached diff fixes a bug that makes the python3-lttngust package > completely broken unless the corresponding liblttng-ust-dev is also > installed. > > The original python code load the library using ctypes without specifying a > soname. This fix was reported and merged upstream. > Anything using ctypes for library bindings should be taken out back and shot. However, this seems like an improvement over the previous even-more-buggy state, so go ahead. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#882434: stretch-pu: package ust/2.9.0-2+deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #882434 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package ust/2.9.0-2+deb9u1 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 882434: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882434 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#882813: stretch-pu: package python-pyperclip/1.5.27-3~deb9u1
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 01:14:27 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > python3-pyperclip misses a proper python3 dependency. > > $ debdiff python3-pyperclip_1.5.27-2_all.deb > python3-pyperclip_1.5.27-3~deb9u1_all.deb > File lists identical (after any substitutions) > > Control files: lines which differ (wdiff format) > > Depends: {+python3:any (>= 3.4~),+} xclip | xsel | python3-pyqt4 > Version: [-1.5.27-2-] {+1.5.27-3~deb9u1+} > Go ahead, thanks. Cheers, Julien
Bug#881871: stretch-pu: package bacula/7.4.4+dfsg-6
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 00:02:29 +0100, Carsten Leonhardt wrote: > 2) Bug #880529: When updating from jessie to stretch, the package > "bacula-director-common" will be removed, but the postrm will stay > around. Upon purging this package, postrm unconditionally removes the > main bacula configuration file /etc/bacula/bacula-dir.conf, leaving > bacula unusable. We fix this by introducing a transitional package that > can then be safely removed. > It sounds like this won't solve the issue for anyone who has already upgraded but hasn't yet purged bacula-director-common. Couldn't bacula-director's postinst neuter the old postrm instead? Cheers, Julien
Bug#882158: stretch-pu: package glibc/2.24-11+deb9u2
Control: tag -1 confirmed On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 14:22:45 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Unfortunately it didn't make in 9.3 due to the regression introduced wrt > /etc/ld.so.nohwcap (see bug#883394). The issue is due to the conversion > of libc6-i686 into a transitional package between jessie and stretch, and > dropping the postinst and postrm script handling the removal of > /etc/ld.so.nohwcap after the upgrade. The problem always existed in > stretch, but the probability for it to happen has been greatly increased > by the fix for #882272. The issue doesn't affect buster/sid as the > transitional package has been removed. > > I have fixed the issue in version 2.24-11+deb9u3 by reintroducing the > postinst and postrm scripts in the transitional package. You will find > below the corresponding patch. > > Thanks for considering it for 9.4. > Assuming that's been tested in all the various scenarios, please go ahead. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#882158: stretch-pu: package glibc/2.24-11+deb9u2
Processing control commands: > tag -1 confirmed Bug #882158 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package glibc/2.24-11+deb9u3 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 882158: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=882158 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processed: Re: Bug#881871: stretch-pu: package bacula/7.4.4+dfsg-6
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #881871 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package bacula/7.4.4+dfsg-6 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 881871: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=881871 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#877593: Acknowledgement (stretch-pu: package ocfs2-tools/1.8.4-4+deb9u1)
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, Nov 26, 2017 at 16:35:18 +0100, Valentin Vidic wrote: > Hi, > > Any thoughs from the release team about this update request? > I'm worried about the risk of regressions for users who already worked around the bug or otherwise changed the links, e.g. to disable those services. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#877593: Acknowledgement (stretch-pu: package ocfs2-tools/1.8.4-4+deb9u1)
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #877593 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package ocfs2-tools/1.8.4-4+deb9u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 877593: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877593 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#877374: stretch-pu: shadow 1:4.4-4.1+deb9u1
Control: tag -1 moreinfo On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 08:04:48 +0200, Balint Reczey wrote: > shadow (1:4.4-4.1+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium > . > * Revert adding pts/0 and pts/1 to securetty. > Adding pts/* defeats the purpose of securetty. Let containers add it if > needed as described in #830255. I'm not sure I'm comfortable with the regression risk for users from this one. How long have those been listed in securetty? > * Fix buffer overflow if NULL line is present in db (CVE-2017-12424) > (Closes: #756630) > I guess that's ok. Cheers, Julien
Processed: Re: Bug#877374: stretch-pu: shadow 1:4.4-4.1+deb9u1
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #877374 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: shadow 1:4.4-4.1+deb9u1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 877374: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877374 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Bug#887060: testing migration happened despite FTBFS on arch:all buildd
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hi, Package src:octave-interval creates two binaries: - octave-interval (arch:any) - octave-interval-doc (arch:all) Version 3.1.0-3 was uploaded on 2018-01-07 as source-only: https://tracker.debian.org/news/899881 Compilation went fine on the arch:any buildds, but failed on the arch:all one: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=octave-interval&arch=all&ver=3.1.0-3&stamp=1515343715&raw=0 Still, testing migration occurred on 2018-01-13: https://tracker.debian.org/news/901166 As of 2018-01-13, the dak status is the following: $ ssh coccia dak ls octave-interval octave-interval-doc octave-interval | 2.1.0-2 | stable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x octave-interval | 2.1.0-2 | unstable | source octave-interval | 2.1.0-2 | unstable-debug | source octave-interval | 2.1.0-2+b1| unstable | kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386 octave-interval | 3.1.0-3 | testing| source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, ppc64el, s390x octave-interval | 3.1.0-3 | unstable | source, amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, hurd-i386, i386, mips, mips64el, mipsel, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x octave-interval | 3.1.0-3 | unstable-debug | source octave-interval-doc | 2.1.0-2 | stable | all octave-interval-doc | 2.1.0-2 | unstable | all octave-interval-doc | 3.1.0-2 | unstable | all i.e. octave-interval is present in testing but octave-interval-doc is not. (I will probably request soon a give-back for octave-interval-doc, so this state will not persist for long). Best, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ http://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄ http://www.debian.org signature.asc Description: PGP signature