Bug#922194: unblock: matplotlib2/2.2.3-6

2019-02-12 Thread Sandro Tosi
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package matplotlib2 the fix in unstable addresses a DeprecationWarning (due to numpy 1.16) that caused FTBFS on other packages + it allows matplotlib2 to build with

NEW changes in stable-new

2019-02-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u5.b2_all.changes ACCEPT

Re: chef and ruby-cheffish in buster

2019-02-12 Thread Antonio Terceiro
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:11:21PM -0200, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > Hi, > > The ci.debian.net nodes are managed with chef, and during the weekend I > realized that it was not in testing. There was an RC bug against chef > (FTBFS, 3 tests broken by an update to the test framework, package just >

chef and ruby-cheffish in buster

2019-02-12 Thread Antonio Terceiro
Hi, The ci.debian.net nodes are managed with chef, and during the weekend I realized that it was not in testing. There was an RC bug against chef (FTBFS, 3 tests broken by an update to the test framework, package just worked nevertheless) and ruby-cheffish (broken by openssl 1.1.1). I fixed both,

testing migration for libxmlb and fwupd

2019-02-12 Thread Mario.Limonciello
Hi, I recently rushed to get libxmlb and a newer fwupd that uses it into Debian unstable with the intent they were there for buster. After the first upload, I saw that the ports were failing to build libxmlb and worked with upstream on a patch. Unfortunately as a result of this the testing

NEW changes in stable-new

2019-02-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: debian-edu-config_1.929+deb9u3_all.changes ACCEPT

Bug#922170: nmu: Four packages for golang

2019-02-12 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu These packages need to be rebuilt to pick up the recent golang DSA: nmu acmetool_0.0.58-5 . ANY . stretch . -m "rebuilt against current golang" nmu chasquid_0.01+git20161124.6479138-2 . ANY

Re: [Piuparts-devel] metaphlan2-data blocked due to a regression false-positive

2019-02-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Aha, found it, On 12-02-2019 22:16, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 11-02-2019 12:06, Holger Levsen wrote: >> On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:01:43AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >>> https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/metaphlan2-data.html >>> since it fails in both sid and buster, it should be

Re: [Piuparts-devel] metaphlan2-data blocked due to a regression false-positive

2019-02-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 11-02-2019 12:06, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2019 at 04:01:43AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: >> https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/metaphlan2-data.html >> since it fails in both sid and buster, it should be allowed to migrate >>

Re: Bits from the Release Team: Debian 10 'buster' is now in the soft freeze

2019-02-12 Thread Niels Thykier
Dominik George: > Hi, > >> and stopped >> accepting source packages into testing that are new to testing or got >> removed > > Does that imply that new *binary* packages built from existing sources can > migrate, if the upload is otherwise suitable during the soft freeze? > > -nik > Yes,

NEW changes in stable-new

2019-02-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: debian-installer-netboot-images_20170615+deb9u5.b2_source.changes ACCEPT

Re: Bits from the Release Team: Debian 10 'buster' is now in the soft freeze

2019-02-12 Thread Dominik George
Hi, > and stopped >accepting source packages into testing that are new to testing or got >removed Does that imply that new *binary* packages built from existing sources can migrate, if the upload is otherwise suitable during the soft freeze? -nik

Re: Bug#904525: release-notes: Links to buster release notes don't work

2019-02-12 Thread Laura Arjona Reina
Hello again El 12/2/19 a las 19:35, Niels Thykier escribió: > Niels Thykier: > Hi, > > I got a reply on IRC and have now created a MR request here: > > https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/merge_requests/2 > Merged, thanks! I'll check the result of the next builds and when I see

Re: Bug#904525: release-notes: Links to buster release notes don't work

2019-02-12 Thread Laura Arjona Reina
Hi El 12 de febrero de 2019 19:16:00 CET, Niels Thykier escribió: >Baptiste Jammet: >> Hello all, >> (adding -release to Cc since they are "in charge" for the release >notes) >> >> Dixit Martin Michlmayr, le 12/02/2019 : >> >>> Since the freeze has started, are there plans to get the release

Re: Bug#904525: release-notes: Links to buster release notes don't work

2019-02-12 Thread Baptiste Jammet
Dixit Niels Thykier, le 12/02/2019 : >Ack, lets move along with using master for buster. I have pushed a >stretch branch now, so it can be used for the job. Thanks. > >> In any case, -www should be asked to update cron/parts/7release-notes >> to add the build for the website. >Is there a salsa

Re: Bug#904525: release-notes: Links to buster release notes don't work

2019-02-12 Thread Niels Thykier
Niels Thykier: > Baptiste Jammet: >> Hello all, >> (adding -release to Cc since they are "in charge" for the release notes) >> >> Dixit Martin Michlmayr, le 12/02/2019 : >> >>> Since the freeze has started, are there plans to get the release notes >>> for buster published (even if only a draft)?

Re: Bug#904525: release-notes: Links to buster release notes don't work

2019-02-12 Thread Niels Thykier
Baptiste Jammet: > Hello all, > (adding -release to Cc since they are "in charge" for the release notes) > > Dixit Martin Michlmayr, le 12/02/2019 : > >> Since the freeze has started, are there plans to get the release notes >> for buster published (even if only a draft)? > > I think we are

Re: Bug#904525: release-notes: Links to buster release notes don't work

2019-02-12 Thread Baptiste Jammet
Hello all, (adding -release to Cc since they are "in charge" for the release notes) Dixit Martin Michlmayr, le 12/02/2019 : >Since the freeze has started, are there plans to get the release notes >for buster published (even if only a draft)? I think we are still trying to find time to do this 

NEW changes in stable-new

2019-02-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: debian-edu-config_1.929+deb9u3_source.changes ACCEPT

Processed: retitle 922110 to RM: libwww-topica-perl -- RoQA; useless due to Topica site removal, tagging 922110

2019-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 922110 RM: libwww-topica-perl -- RoQA; useless due to Topica site > removal Bug #922110 [release.debian.org] RM: libwww-topica-perl/0.6-5 -- service lists.topica.com is gone Changed Bug title to 'RM: libwww-topica-perl -- RoQA; useless

Bug#922107: marked as done (nmu: scalapack_2.0.2-7 mocassin_2.02.73-1 netpipe_3.7.2-7.4)

2019-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:06:32 +0100 with message-id <222ac0f9-348c-536c-5fb6-0f7fbe514...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#922107: nmu: scalapack_2.0.2-7 mocassin_2.02.73-1 netpipe_3.7.2-7.4 has caused the Debian Bug report #922107, regarding nmu: scalapack_2.0.2-7

Bug#922054: marked as done (nmu: tensorflow_1.10.1+dfsg-A2)

2019-02-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Feb 2019 11:01:53 +0100 with message-id <818a01ac-3aae-55b1-581d-41a2a9c60...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#922054: nmu: tensorflow_1.10.1+dfsg-A2 has caused the Debian Bug report #922054, regarding nmu: tensorflow_1.10.1+dfsg-A2 to be marked as done. This means

NEW changes in stable-new

2019-02-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20170615+deb9u5+b2_mips64el.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

2019-02-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20170615+deb9u5+b2_mipsel.changes ACCEPT

Bug#922010: RFS: libmurmurhash 1.3

2019-02-12 Thread Fabian Klötzl
On 11.02.19 22:24, Andreas Tille wrote: I had a look on the build logs[1] and at least mips and s390x keep on failing (some archs are not yet build). Sorry for keeping you busy with this That's fine, because it is entirely my fault; Wouldn't have happened if I had merged your automake

NEW changes in stable-new

2019-02-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20170615+deb9u5+b2_armel.changes ACCEPT Processing changes file: debian-installer_20170615+deb9u5+b2_armhf.changes ACCEPT

NEW changes in stable-new

2019-02-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: debian-installer_20170615+deb9u5+b2_mips.changes ACCEPT