Bug#906258: stretch-pu: package yubico-piv-tool/1.4.2-2
On 2/23/19 7:56 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 02:27:04PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:34:50PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: I assume I can't just dput this, as it already exists in stable-new. Could you reject the existing package first, and I will reupload? >>> >>> Uploaded a new revision at the request of jcristau. >> >> Ping? > > Nevermind, ftpmaster rejected the upload: > They did not; I did, as I told you in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=906258#69 > On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 05:47:07PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: >> yubico-piv-tool - inappropriate changelog entry > > > Dear ftpmasters, could you clarify in which way the changelog entry is > inappropriate, and what would be an appropriate changelog entry? > An appropriate changelog entry is one that describes the changes made to the package. For example, "Remove cruft that was included in the source package by mistake" would be one way to describe the changes in your upload. Cheers, Julien
Bug#923072: RM: why/2.40-3+b1 from testing
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm Hi, please remove src:why from testing. why depends on why3. However, the version of why in testing, as well as the newest version of why published by ustream, need a version of why3 <= 0/88.3 which is older than the version of why3 that we have in testing or in unstable. This makes why unusable [1]. For this reason I think that why should not be distributed with buster, please remove it from testing. The current why in testing delays the migration of coq and friends (I hope we get one day all the blockers of coq out of the way!) Thanks -Ralf. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=902618 -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-3-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.utf8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Bug#906258: stretch-pu: package yubico-piv-tool/1.4.2-2
On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 02:27:04PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:34:50PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > > > I assume I can't just dput this, as it already exists in stable-new. > > > Could you reject the existing package first, and I will reupload? > > > > Uploaded a new revision at the request of jcristau. > > Ping? Nevermind, ftpmaster rejected the upload: On Sat, Feb 23, 2019 at 05:47:07PM +, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > yubico-piv-tool - inappropriate changelog entry Dear ftpmasters, could you clarify in which way the changelog entry is inappropriate, and what would be an appropriate changelog entry? Best, nicoo signature.asc Description: PGP signature
NEW changes in stable-new
Processing changes file: yubico-piv-tool_1.4.2-2+deb9u2_source.changes REJECT
Bug#906258: stretch-pu: package yubico-piv-tool/1.4.2-2
On 2/15/19 4:55 PM, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:34:50PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: >> I assume I can't just dput this, as it already exists in stable-new. >> Could you reject the existing package first, and I will reupload? > > Uploaded a new revision at the request of jcristau. > I've marked that revision for reject as its changelog entry is entirely inappropriate and doesn't describe the changes to the package. Cheers, Julien
Bug#906258: stretch-pu: package yubico-piv-tool/1.4.2-2
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 04:55:58PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 03:34:50PM +0100, Nicolas Braud-Santoni wrote: > > I assume I can't just dput this, as it already exists in stable-new. > > Could you reject the existing package first, and I will reupload? > > Uploaded a new revision at the request of jcristau. Ping? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
