Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> # missing release
> tags 931245 buster
Bug #931245 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
rust-encoding-rs/0.8.15-2~deb10u1 ?
Added tag(s) buster.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
931245:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 931245
Bug #931245 {Done: Paul Gevers } [release.debian.org]
unblock: rust-encoding-rs/0.8.15-2
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #931245 to the same values
previously set
> retitle 931245 buster-pu: package
Hi again, sorry for bothering, but…
… in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931040#10
it was indicated this should go into the first point release,
and https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2019/07/msg2.html
indicates that that will be done in little more than a weel,
On Sun 2019-07-21 15:55:28 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Control: affects -1 src:gnupg2
>
> The version of GnuPG in debian buster (2.2.12-1) has a number of
>
Jonathan Wiltshire, le sam. 27 juil. 2019 20:36:00 -0300, a ecrit:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 07:36:55PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > As reported on #917909, the text-based debian installer support for
> > right-to-left languages is completely broken, only due to a path
> > mismatch. This was
On 2019-07-26 08:57, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote:
Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian.
You can follow progress on this Bug here: 933043:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933043.
I missed the name of sundials in the second set of binNMUs with slepc:
nmu
reopen 931245
retitle 931245 buster-pu: package rust-encoding-rs/0.8.15-2~deb10u1 ?
user release.debian@packages.debian.org
usertags 931245 - unblock
usertags 931245 pu
thanks
On Sat, 27 Jul 2019 08:44:16 +0200 Salvatore Bonaccorso
wrote:
> > I think you just can recycle this one (and update
On Jul 28 2019, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> The two MIPS libffi patches have been accepted upstream (i.e. in the
> libffi git repository) 1.5 years ago for one and 4 years ago for the
> other. I know there hasn't been any recent libffi release, so what can
> be done to sync the gcc repository? Would
8 matches
Mail list logo
