On 8/18/19 4:35 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 21:44 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
>> I'd like to upload a fix for open-vm-tools to proposed-updates which
>> actually allows to recognize buster.
>>
>> `lsb_release -sd` currently prints
>> Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
>> but
On 2019-08-18 17:58:59, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > As usual, libx265 bumped its SONAME. All reverse dependencies build fine
> > against the new version. Please let me know once it's a good time to
> > upload the new version from experimental to unstable.
>
> Please go ahead.
Thanks, uploaded.
Hi Adam
Am 16.08.19 um 22:08 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
>
> On Fri, 2019-07-26 at 21:43 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I'd like to make a stable upload for systemd, fixing the following
>> issues:
> [...]
>> 241-5+deb10u1 is identical to 241-7 which has been uploaded
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 10:47:03AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> As usual, libx265 bumped its SONAME. All reverse dependencies build fine
> against the new version. Please let me know once it's a good time to
> upload the new version from experimental to unstable.
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #934368 [release.debian.org] transition: x265
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
934368: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934368
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> close 934112
Bug #934112 [release.debian.org] transition: poco
Marked Bug as done
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
934112: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934112
Debian Bug
Control: tag -1 confirmed
On Sun, Jul 07, 2019 at 04:29:31PM +0200, Sylvestre Ledru wrote:
> Now that we release buster, I would like to move llvm-defaults to
> llvm-toolchain-8.
Ok, let's go!
Thanks,
--
Jonathan Wiltshire j...@debian.org
Debian Developer
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 confirmed
Bug #931551 [release.debian.org] transition: llvm-defaults to 8
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
931551: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931551
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 08:54:21AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > On 19/08/08 09:46, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > > I think we should also try to improve the visibility towards reverse
> > > dependencies that their autopkgtest is blocking other packages. I would
> > > love tracker (and the old pts) to
On Sun, 2019-08-18 at 16:56 +0200, Arnaud Rebillout wrote:
> * The bug you want to fix in stable must be fixed in unstable
> already (and not waiting in NEW or the delayed queue)
>
> My issue with this particular bug (#933002) is that for now,
> docker.io doesn't build in unstable. It
Dear Release Team,
I'm new to the process of uploading to stable, I need your guidance on
that one.
From the buster announce:
* The bug you want to fix in stable must be fixed in unstable
already (and not waiting in NEW or the delayed queue)
My issue with this particular bug
On 2019-08-18 15:27, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 16:42 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > I would like to update usbutils in stretch to update the usb.ids
> > database. There is no code change, the changes only adds a few
> > hundred of USB devices to the database. There are a lot
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #934163 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
ncurses/6.1+20181013-2+deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
934163: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934163
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
On 8/16/19 9:35 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
So is the conclusion there that docker.io is or is not actually
affected?
Yes docker.io is affected as well.
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 18:01 +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> I have just uploaded ncurses 6.1+20181013-2+deb10u1 to Buster which
> contains a one-line fix for bug #933053[1], the same as in version
> 6.1+20190713-2 which is now in testing.
>
> Some background: for
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 21:44 +0200, Bernd Zeimetz wrote:
> I'd like to upload a fix for open-vm-tools to proposed-updates which
> actually allows to recognize buster.
>
> `lsb_release -sd` currently prints
> Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster)
> but the current implementation in open-vm-tools expects
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 10:20 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote:
> There's a crash in Stretch with ICU, there's a missing NULL check in
> the LocalArray class. It crashes ICU with certain options / use
> case[1]. Upstream fixed it[2] and now I would like to make it to
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #934952 [release.debian.org] stretch-pu: package icu/57.1-6+deb9u3
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
934952: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934952
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #934956 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package cryptsetup/2:2.1.0-5+deb10u1
Added tag(s) d-i and confirmed.
--
934956: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=934956
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
On Sat, 2019-08-17 at 11:03 +0200, Guilhem Moulin wrote:
> Buster's cryptsetup (2:2.1.0-5) doesn't cope well with LUKS2 headers
> without any bound keyslot: adding a new key slot to such a header
> fails, both via the crypt_keyslot_add_by_volume_key() API call and
On Sat, 2019-08-03 at 16:42 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> I would like to update usbutils in stretch to update the usb.ids
> database. There is no code change, the changes only adds a few
> hundred of USB devices to the database. There are a lot of new
> entries as this hasn't been updated for
Your message dated Sun, 18 Aug 2019 15:26:14 +0200
with message-id <54380ddc-3434-49e3-12af-0a72393e0...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#934872: RM: ocaml-usb/1.3.0-4 ocaml-sqlexpr/0.5.5-3
zeroinstall-injector/2.12.3-2 obus/1.1.5-6
has caused the Debian Bug report #934872,
regarding RM:
Your message dated Sun, 18 Aug 2019 12:18:40 +0100
with message-id <1566127120.5665.11.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#935028: nmu: lutok_0.4+dfsg-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #935028,
regarding nmu: lutok_0.4+dfsg-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Control: tag -1 - d-i
Hi Jonathan,
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 02:37:25PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> As there's a udeb involved I will just check with the d-i release managers
> that this isn't an issue, though I can't see that fixing a crash would be
> all that controversial.
I can confirm
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 - d-i
Bug #933764 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package e2fsprogs/1.44.5-1+deb10u1
Removed tag(s) d-i.
--
933764: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=933764
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
nmu lutok_0.4+dfsg-1 . all amd64 . unstable . -m "Rebuild on buildd for
transition to bullseye"
- -- System Information:
Debian Release:
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer writes ("Re: Bits from the Release Team:
ride like the wind, Bullseye!"):
> My personal point of view (and because of this it might be biased)
> is that the maintainers of the packages that ship autopkgtest should
> be the reponsibles for any breackage it might
27 matches
Mail list logo
