Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote...
> Is this still something it is worth to pursue and adress those two
> CVEs pending for stretch or is the regression risk to high?
In my opinion it is worth to pursue it - so let me rebase upon the
latest releas in Debian 9 ("stretch") and upload to (old)s-p-u soon,
Hello,
Le 03/02/2020 à 21:05, Paul Gevers a écrit :
>> Currently, ocaml-dune/2.1.3-1 is blocked in unstable because of
>> autopkgtest failure of ocaml-sedlex/2.1-3. However, this test failure
>> has been fixed in ocaml-sedlex/2.1-4. Likewise, ocaml-sedlex/2.1-4 is
>> bloked in unstable because of
UNSUBSCRIBE
On Mon, 3 Feb 2020, 22:40 Adam D. Barratt, wrote:
>
>
> Debian Stable Updates Announcement SUA 177-1
> https://www.debian.org/
> debian-release@lists.debian.org
>
Your message dated Sun, 9 Feb 2020 13:18:40 +0100
with message-id <1f31697a-3216-11e1-d043-60e0b1873...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#950342: RM: volatility/2.6.1-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #950342,
regarding RM: volatility/2.6.1-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim
4 matches
Mail list logo