Hi Sebastian
Tonight, you contributed to our IRC meeting, saying that you'd be
willing to help out. Awesome.
Before bluntly accepting you as a trainee, we would like to get an idea
of what, why and how you would want to contribute to the team. Which
part(s) of the Release Teams work would you'd
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
firefox-esr 60+ has not been built on mips* for stretch due to lack of
the required rustc version (mipsel, mips64el) or a FTBFS (mips).
It seems to build fine in buster.
Please
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: stretch
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
firefox-esr 68+ is no longer supported on armel due to lack of the
required nodejs 8.11.
Please remove the stale binaries from stretch.
Andreas
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu gunroar_0.15.dfsg1-9 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against libphobos76
from gcc-9"
nmu parsec47_0.2.dfsg1-9 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against libphobos76
from gcc-9"
Quoting
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
I only recently discovered that reportbug ate all emails that had
postmaster@. That and G-Suite changing MAIL FROM to
when the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
nmu zeroc-ice_3.7.3-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for PHP 7.4 transition"
Hi, this is the last binary package affected by (unplanned) PHP
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 12:14:08PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I looked again and I was looking at an old version. Sorry for the
> noise. I still think we have problems with these
> 937132 nevow: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
> 938622 tahoe-lafs: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
> which I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I'd like to fix an important bug in backuppc which prevents
`systemd reload backuppc.service` from failing. As a result of this bug
backuppc has to be restarted for systemd's
Andrey Rahmatullin writes ("Re: git-buildpackage to be autoremoved due to
python2 transition"):
> Yes, and as far as I can see after pydoctor migrates the only problem with
> gbp will be python-rpm in debian/tests/control, which is probably
> unneeded.
Oh.
> > the py2 rot seems wider including
On Wed, Feb 26, 2020 at 11:28:03AM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> FYI. The widespread impact of this not so apparent because
> git-buildpackage is typically used ad-hoc by maintainers, rather than
> via (Build)-Depends.
>
> Relevant packages and bugs:
> 943107 git-buildpackage: Python2 removal in
FYI. The widespread impact of this not so apparent because
git-buildpackage is typically used ad-hoc by maintainers, rather than
via (Build)-Depends.
Relevant packages and bugs:
943107 git-buildpackage: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
937132 nevow: Python2 removal in sid/bullseye
938622
Hi Adam,
>+sssd (1.16.3-3.2) buster; urgency=medium
>
>1.16.3-3.1+deb10u1 would be more conventional, please.
Yes, indeed (although there has been precedence for this,
considering the version numbers are only so they don’t
confluct with later uploads in $distro+1). I admit I had
not consciously
Control: fixed 951329 user-mode-linux/5.4-1um-2
El 25/02/20 a las 21:05, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
> Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
>
> On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 14:49 +0100, Santiago R.R. wrote:
> > I would like to upload user-mode-linux to buster to fix this FTBFS:
> > https://bugs.debian.org/951329.
13 matches
Mail list logo
