Hi Mathieu
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 at 22:39, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> SInce 14h 10m! Oh wait ;-)
I did :) and have scheduled the binNMUs for samba now.
I'm not sure if you've noticed, but ceph is in quite a bad state. Is
it possible to build samba without it?
Regards
Graham
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Dear Release Team,
the last upload of xoreos-tools included binaries for amd64, which were built
with outdated dependencies.
Thus xoreos-tools:amd64 is currently uninstallable, as it
> "Paul" == Paul Wise writes:
Paul> switching to another module but I suspect that modauthkerb
Paul> should just get removed from Debian in favour of
Paul> mod_auth_gssapi, which is supposed to be a replacement.
I think that mod_auth_gssapi plus mod_auth_pam and libpam-sss or
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 7:45 PM Sam Hartman wrote:
> I note that libapache2-mod-auth-kerb seems to be QA maintained
> effectively in Debian.
> I haven't looked at upstream to see if they have a fix.
Upstream is basically unmaintained, despite still having users.
We are using
Processing changes file: choose-mirror_2.99+deb10u2_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: choose-mirror_2.99+deb10u2_ppc64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: partman-auto_149+deb10u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: choose-mirror_2.99+deb10u2_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: choose-mirror_2.99+deb10u2_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: lmod_6.6-0.3+deb10u1_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: choose-mirror_2.99+deb10u2_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: choose-mirror_2.99+deb10u2_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: choose-mirror_2.99+deb10u2_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Le ven. 20 nov. 2020 à 21:36, Matthias Klose a écrit :
>
> On 11/20/20 9:33 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> > On 11/20/20 9:13 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> It looks like samba was forgotten by the binNMU request.
> >>
> >> See https://bugs.debian.org/975330
> >>
> >> Can you schedule
On 11/20/20 9:33 PM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 11/20/20 9:13 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> It looks like samba was forgotten by the binNMU request.
>>
>> See https://bugs.debian.org/975330
>>
>> Can you schedule that?
>
> no, according to
>
On 11/20/20 9:13 PM, Mathieu Parent wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It looks like samba was forgotten by the binNMU request.
>
> See https://bugs.debian.org/975330
>
> Can you schedule that?
no, according to
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/python3.9-default.html
ldb ftbfs on s390x.
Hi,
It looks like samba was forgotten by the binNMU request.
See https://bugs.debian.org/975330
Can you schedule that?
Thanks
--
Mathieu Parent
On 2020-11-20 17:24:30 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Predictably we're again quite close to a point release. :-( (One week
> from freeze, specifically.)
oh.
> Looking at the upstream issues regarding certificate validation changes
> between 1.1.1e and f/g, #11456 appears to have been
> "Sam" == Sam Hartman writes:
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Ramacher writes:
>>> I've uploaded to unstable. There's what tracker lists as a
>>> regression in CI tests:
>>>
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/ppc64el/s/squid/8297228/log.gz
>>>
>>> I don't
Hi Adam,
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:08 AM Adam D. Barratt
wrote:
>
> My understanding is that the service / timer for this is not enabled by
> default, so this change will make things work for those users who have
> explicitly chosen to enable it, but have no effect on any user who has
> not
> "Sebastian" == Sebastian Ramacher writes:
>> I've uploaded to unstable. There's what tracker lists as a
>> regression in CI tests:
>>
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/ppc64el/s/squid/8297228/log.gz
>>
>> I don't think that regression looks caused by
Processing changes file: choose-mirror_2.99+deb10u2_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: lmod_6.6-0.3+deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: node-pathval_1.1.0-3+deb10u1_sourceonly.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: partman-auto_149+deb10u1_source.changes
Control: block -1 by 975344
On 2020-11-20 13:04:06 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I've uploaded to unstable.
> There's what tracker lists as a regression in CI tests:
> https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/ppc64el/s/squid/8297228/log.gz
>
> I don't think that regression looks caused by
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 975344
Bug #974982 [release.debian.org] transition: krb5
974982 was not blocked by any bugs.
974982 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 974982: 975344
--
974982: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=974982
Debian Bug
On Tue, 2020-11-03 at 02:50 -0800, Felix Lechner wrote:
> +mdadm (4.1-1+deb10u1) buster-updates; urgency=medium
The distribution there wants to simply be "buster", please. "buster-
updates" is a related suite to which we can push packages if
appropriate, but it's not an upload target and, while
package release.debian.org
tags 973917 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: tcpdump
Version: 4.9.3-1~deb10u2
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 972963 = buster pending
Bug #972963 [release.debian.org] buster-pu:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 973917 = buster pending
Bug #973917 [release.debian.org] buster-pu:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 972903 = buster pending
Bug #972903 [release.debian.org] buster-pu:
package release.debian.org
tags 972963 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: lmod
Version: 6.6-0.3+deb10u1
package release.debian.org
tags 972903 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: node-pathval
Version:
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
Hi,
On Fri, 2020-11-20 at 07:43 +, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> Stable currently has Tor 0.3.5.10.
>
> Upstream released 0.3.5.11 and 0.3.5.12 since, which bring some
> security fixes, update the list of fallback directory servers, and a
> few things more.
>
> See
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #975297 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package tor/0.3.5.12-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
975297: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=975297
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
I've uploaded to unstable.
There's what tracker lists as a regression in CI tests:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/ppc64el/s/squid/8297228/log.gz
I don't think that regression looks caused by krb5 after examining the
log.
Do you need me to request binnmu of
On Sun, 2020-11-15 at 11:29 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> control: retitle -1 buster-pu: package openssl/1.1.1h-1
>
> On 2020-05-02 22:34:40 [+0100], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > > Do we have any feeling for how widespread such certificates
> > > > might be?
> > > > The fact that
Hi
A friendly reminder about the porter roll call for bullseye.
On Mon, 2 Nov 2020 at 22:23, Graham Inggs wrote:
> We are doing a roll call for porters of all release architectures. If
> you are an active porter behind one of the release architectures [1]
> for the entire lifetime of Debian
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> retitle 975297 buster-pu: package tor/0.3.5.12-1
Bug #975297 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package tor/3.5.12-1
Changed Bug title to 'buster-pu: package tor/0.3.5.12-1' from 'buster-pu:
package tor/3.5.12-1'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
On Fri, 20 Nov 2020, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> I would like to build and upload packages for tor 3.5.12.
Actually, that's 0.3.5.12, and the package would be 0.3.5.12-1.
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
[slightly delayed, as I just realised that I still had this in drafts
for some reason]
On Sun, 2020-09-20 at 21:26 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 20/09/2020 10:55, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> > On 25/07/2020 12:04, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > > Unfortunately it appears that this
33 matches
Mail list logo
