Bug#976115: marked as done (transition: boost-defaults)

2021-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 12 Jan 2021 23:40:03 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#976115: transition: boost-defaults has caused the Debian Bug report #976115, regarding transition: boost-defaults to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Re: unblocking zfs-linux/2.0.1-1 for migration

2021-01-12 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi, On 12-01-2021 15:41, cdlumin...@gmail.com wrote: > I'm confused by the migration status page for src:zfs-linux > https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=zfs-linux Thanks for reaching out. > It says Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression, > but the RC bugs were already

NEW changes in stable-new

2021-01-12 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Processing changes file: f2fs-tools_1.14.0-3~bpo10+1_amd64.changes REJECT

Processed: Re: Bug#979651: transition: libpodofo

2021-01-12 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 = confirmed Bug #979651 [release.debian.org] transition: libpodofo Added tag(s) confirmed; removed tag(s) moreinfo. -- 979651: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=979651 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#979651: transition: libpodofo

2021-01-12 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
Control: tags -1 = confirmed On 2021-01-12 14:27:05 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:21:09AM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > On 2021-01-10 19:19:12 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > > Control: forwarded -1 > > >

unblocking zfs-linux/2.0.1-1 for migration

2021-01-12 Thread cdluminate
Hi release team, I'm confused by the migration status page for src:zfs-linux https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=zfs-linux It says Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression, but the RC bugs were already fixed in 2.0.1-1 (it really compiles against linux 5.10). And

Bug#979651: transition: libpodofo

2021-01-12 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 09:21:09AM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > On 2021-01-10 19:19:12 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > Control: forwarded -1 > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpodofo.html > > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > > > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 07:03:34PM +0100,

Bug#976811: transition: php8.0

2021-01-12 Thread Ondřej Surý
I guess we are going to release with PHP 7.4 then. Not the ideal choice, but I will do whatever I can to support it. However, I would like to get an official statement from the release team what's their position, so we can go forward. Pretty please? Also an advice on how to proceed next time

Bug#979651: transition: libpodofo

2021-01-12 Thread Sebastian Ramacher
On 2021-01-10 19:19:12 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpodofo.html > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 07:03:34PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > I haven't yet rebuilt the rdeps, but since the API