On Monday, 25 January 2021 12:02:26 PM AEDT Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> - Podman 3 drops the legacy varlink interface. To the best of my
> knowledge, there are no packages in debian/testing that would require
> varlink (please correct me if I'm wrong here). Not having to support
> varlink in Debian
Dear release-team,
I'm proposing to have podman 3.0 in debian/bullseye. As maintainer of the
package, I'm convinced this is a good step for Debian because:
- podman 3.0 will be included in RHEL 8.4, which will be released in May
2021. I expect security support for podman in Debian to become
Adding the release team. See comment below.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:31:12AM +, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> Today I packaged up 5.32.1~rc1 and have uploaded it to experimental.
>
> I would like to include the relevant changes into bullseye, by
> cherry picking the following 27 patches
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
I'd like to update the intel-microcode package in Debian Buster.
This is a security-related update, but since it had a larger potential
for regressions, I coordinated with the
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu xmobar_0.36-2 . ppc64el . unstable . -m "Rebuild with newer binutils to fix
#973623"
Please rebuild xmobar on ppc64el to fix #973623. autopkgtest currently
fails on ppc64el, and I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
Hi SRM
The 0.7.git20120829-3.2 to unstable fixed CVE-2020-6097 for atftp. I
propose to address the same (no-dsa marked) issue as well for buster
in
On 2021-01-22 16:38:28 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Assuming that a patched m2crypto will also build fine against openssl
> 1.1.1d, then there's no reason that the two shouldn't proceed in
> parallel (i.e. feel free to file the m2crypto request already).
Yes, it does. Bug filled. Thank you.
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: buster
Severity: normal
This is the proposed update for Buster to fix a build failure against
openssl 1.1.1i which is proposed for Buster.
The patch touches only the testsuite.
The m2crypto issue is
On 2021-01-22 16:38:28 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Both would be good, please.
here is the with the two additional patches.
Sebastian
diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 088c914a3dd4a..56a950734f01d 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -4,8 +4,9 @@
On Sat, 23 Jan 2021 at 15:55:54 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Based on the descriptions, I'd be
> happy to defer to your judgement as to which of the two options you'd
> be happiest to support for the future.
Thanks! I'll do some more testing on 1.0.0.68-1~deb10u1 and plan to
upload that one if
Your message dated Sun, 24 Jan 2021 09:19:02 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#980875: buster-pu: package
gst-plugins-bad1.0/1.14.4-1+deb10u1
has caused the Debian Bug report #980875,
regarding buster-pu: package gst-plugins-bad1.0/1.14.4-1+deb10u1
to be marked as done.
This means
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 04:47:39PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: buster
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: car...@debian.org
>
> Hi SRM,
>
> As pointed out by Adam, since there was a binNMU
12 matches
Mail list logo
