Processing control commands:
> retitle -1 pre-approval: qutebrowser/2.0.1-2
Bug #980847 [release.debian.org] pre-approval: qutebrowser/2.0.0-1
Changed Bug title to 'pre-approval: qutebrowser/2.0.1-2' from 'pre-approval:
qutebrowser/2.0.0-1'.
--
980847:
Hi there,
after a month of concentrate work together with Rock Storm on the
arduino package , and some related build depending packages the Debian
Electronics Team is happy we have now an updated Arduino IDE package in
unstable.
https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/arduino
The current migration
Hi,
On 28-01-2021 22:36, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
>> Would you have also asked us if you wouldn't have needed the binNMU's?
>
> Yes, since https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html says
> changes to build-essential may only be made with pre-approval...
Right. Thank you, I should
Hi Matthias,
On 29-01-2021 12:13, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> We would be happy with either of the following:
>> 1) upload to unstable with PR27218 only
>> 2) upload to experimental first (with a 2.36+really2.35.2 version) to
>> check all is fine.
>
> so I don't see what an upload for 2) would
On 2021-01-28 00:28:03 [+0100], Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 07:03:37PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > There are a whole bunch of other issues and pull requests related to
> > this. I hope this is the end of the regressions in the X509 code.
>
> So there is something else now:
>
On Fri, 29 Jan 2021, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Control: tags -1 + confirmed
> On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 13:27 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > On Sun, 24 Jan 2021, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> > The 3.20201118.1~deb10u1 version of the package (the one I am
> > > proposing for the
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Bug #981345 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package systemd/241-7~deb10u6
Added tag(s) confirmed and d-i.
--
981345: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=981345
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed d-i
Hi,
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 17:47 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I'd like to make a stable upload for systemd fixing #975561:
>
> journal: do not trigger assertion when journal_file_close() get
> NULL
>
> The rest is autopkgtest updates, as the current state is
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #981339 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package device-tree-compiler/1.4.7-4
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
981339: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=981339
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 16:31 +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I'd like to propose a fix for a dtc segfault in buster, which can
> prevent people from checking what their device-tree looks like,
> making it harder to debug why device-tree overlays don't work:
>
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + confirmed
Bug #980962 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package
intel-microcode/3.20201118.1~deb10u1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
980962: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=980962
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Control: tags -1 + confirmed
On Fri, 2021-01-29 at 13:27 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Jan 2021, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> The 3.20201118.1~deb10u1 version of the package (the one I am
> > proposing for the stable update) contains changes not (yet?) in
> >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: pkg-systemd-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org, k...@debian.org,
debian-b...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
I'd like to make a stable upload for systemd fixing #975561:
On Sun, 24 Jan 2021, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Regressions were indeed reported (as expected). A few days ago, Intel
> published relevant information pinpointing the regression on Skylake D0
> and Skylake R0 processors to specific conditions (detailed below for
> completeness).
>
> The
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
I'd like to propose a fix for a dtc segfault in buster, which can
prevent people from checking what their device-tree looks like,
making it harder to debug why device-tree
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 10:21:21PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Dominic,
>
> On 28-01-2021 22:05, Dominic Hargreaves wrote:
> >>> 5.32.1 would need a binnmu of a few leaf packages
> >>> (libpar-packer-perl libdevel-cover-perl libclass-xsaccessor-perl
> >>> libcommon-sense-perl) as usual.
> >>
>
On 1/28/21 8:36 PM, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> On 27-01-2021 22:42, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> I have been following the way the linux source package was uploaded.
>> Apparently
>> the package entered unstable with just an announcement like this. And more
>> than
>> one time.
>
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
