Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-02 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2021-03-02 19:44:58 [+0100], Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Sebastian, Hi Paul, > Unfortunately we haven't made up our mind yet, but to get some (albeit > limited) exposure and autopkgtest coverage (via the pseudo-excuses) [2], > I think your chances for a go are higher if the proposed package is >

Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-02 Thread Paul Gevers
Hi Sebastian, On 18-02-2021 23:57, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > Please unblock package xz-utils. xz-utils is listed on our (build-)essential list [1]. Because the package is potentially influencing the build artifacts, we're reluctant to allow changes at this moment because corner case use

Bug#983876: marked as done (unblock: otrs2/6.0.32-1)

2021-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 2 Mar 2021 19:38:43 +0100 with message-id <57e62486-0803-6ef0-a42c-0cebef04b...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#983876: unblock: otrs2/6.0.32-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #983876, regarding unblock: otrs2/6.0.32-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#983876: unblock: otrs2/6.0.32-1

2021-03-02 Thread Patrick Matthäi
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Hello release team, I try to citize from my mails to the security team:, it's about #982927: Yesterday I had a videocall with the owner and lead developer of OTOBO. They want to support

Bug#983857: marked as done (nmu: uhd_4.0.0.0-4)

2021-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 2 Mar 2021 13:49:04 +0200 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#983857: nmu: uhd_4.0.0.0-4 has caused the Debian Bug report #983857, regarding nmu: uhd_4.0.0.0-4 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#983857: nmu: uhd_4.0.0.0-4

2021-03-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu uhd_4.0.0.0-4 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against dpdk 20.11" uhd/experimental still depends on dpdk 19.11 libraries. Andreas

Bug#983850: marked as done (nmu: gr-hpsdr_2.0-1)

2021-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 2 Mar 2021 10:04:54 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#983850: nmu: gr-hpsdr_2.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #983850, regarding nmu: gr-hpsdr_2.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Bug#983850: nmu: gr-hpsdr_2.0-1

2021-03-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu gr-hpsdr_2.0-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against Python 3.9" gr-hpsdr/experimental is still linked against Python 3.8 That seems to be the last rebuildable outdated python3

Bug#983846: marked as done (nmu: gnudatalanguage_1.0.0~rc.3-1)

2021-03-02 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 2 Mar 2021 09:48:21 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#983846: nmu: gnudatalanguage_1.0.0~rc.3-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #983846, regarding nmu: gnudatalanguage_1.0.0~rc.3-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

Bug#983846: nmu: gnudatalanguage_1.0.0~rc.3-1

2021-03-02 Thread Andreas Beckmann
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu gnudatalanguage_1.0.0~rc.3-1 . ANY . experimental . -m "Rebuild against Python 3.9" gnudatalanguage/experimental is still linked against Python 3.8. Andreas

Re: Request to unfreeze mininet

2021-03-02 Thread Tomasz Buchert
On 28/02/21 22:43, Graham Inggs wrote: > Hi Tomasz > > On Sun, 28 Feb 2021 at 00:07, Tomasz Buchert wrote: > > as the maintainer of mininet [1], I'd like to request a transition of > > 2.3.0-1 to bullseye. The upstream release of the package had > > unfortunate timing and didn't make it beyond