Bug#984561: Pre-approval for uploading vorta/0.7.5-1

2021-03-04 Thread Nicholas D Steeves
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Dear Release Team, With the exception of added translations (the bulk of the changes), six small features added by samuel-w ("papercut" class bugs), and commits irrelevant to the Debian package, all of the

Bug#984557: unblock: ansible-base/2.10.5+dfsg-1

2021-03-04 Thread Lee Garrett
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: deb...@rocketjump.eu, hlieber...@setec.io Please unblock package ansible-base [ Reason ] Due to missing upload ACLs I unfortunately missed the soft freeze by a few days.

Bug#984478: marked as done (nmu: jgmenu_4.3.0-1)

2021-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 5 Mar 2021 00:00:06 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#984478: nmu: jgmenu_4.3.0-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #984478, regarding nmu: jgmenu_4.3.0-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the

Processed: Re: Bug#984468: Pre-approval for uploading KDE Apps 20.12.3

2021-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 984468 confirmed moreinfo Bug #984468 [release.debian.org] Pre-approval for uploading KDE Apps 20.12.3 Added tag(s) confirmed and moreinfo. > user release.debian@packages.debian.org Setting user to release.debian@packages.debian.org

Bug#984468: Pre-approval for uploading KDE Apps 20.12.3

2021-03-04 Thread Paul Gevers
tags 984468 confirmed moreinfo user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 984468 unblock thanks Hi Aurélien, On 03-03-2021 23:50, Aurélien COUDERC wrote: > I’d like to get a pre-aproval for uploading the packages listed below as > they will not have migrated to testing before the hard

Bug#984494: marked as done (unblock: xpdf/3.04+git20210103-2)

2021-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 4 Mar 2021 21:12:09 +0100 with message-id and subject line Re: Bug#984494: unblock: xpdf/3.04+git20210103-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #984494, regarding unblock: xpdf/3.04+git20210103-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt

Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-04 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 2021-03-04 12:32:48 [+0100], Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Sebastian Hi, > Can you please send a debdiff where you undo the renaming (where > applicable), such that we get a better understanding of the real changes? Sure. Please find attached. > What I *think* we're going to do is accept the

Bug#984494: unblock: xpdf/3.04+git20210103-2

2021-03-04 Thread Florian Schlichting
Hi Paul, > > As an unrelated issue, I just noticed after uploading -2 that the > > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 hardening buildflag fails to be correctly injected. > > This can apparently be fixed by a small change to debian/rules: > > > > export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS=hardening=+all > > > >

Processed: Re: Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #983071 [release.debian.org] unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 983071: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983071 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#983071: unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1

2021-03-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi Sebastian On 02-03-2021 21:55, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: >> Unfortunately we haven't made up our mind yet, but to get some (albeit >> limited) exposure and autopkgtest coverage (via the pseudo-excuses) [2], >> I think your chances for a go are higher if the

Bug#984501: unblock: libqb/2.0.3-1

2021-03-04 Thread Ferenc Wágner
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package libqb Dear Release Team, Upstream made a new minor release of libqb yesterday. Since a new upload wouldn't migrate before the hard freeze with the current 10 day

Bug#983628: marked as done (unblock: geeqie/1:1.6-7)

2021-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 4 Mar 2021 11:47:15 +0100 with message-id <223c3f45-87a4-b43b-2cbf-f0ee43c8d...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#983628: unblock: geeqie/1:1.6-7 has caused the Debian Bug report #983628, regarding unblock: geeqie/1:1.6-7 to be marked as done. This means that you claim

Bug#984494: unblock: xpdf/3.04+git20210103-2

2021-03-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tags -1 confirmed Hi Florian, On 04-03-2021 08:53, Florian Schlichting wrote: > Please unblock package xpdf Sure, but see below. > As an unrelated issue, I just noticed after uploading -2 that the > -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 hardening buildflag fails to be correctly injected. > This can

Processed: Re: Bug#984494: unblock: xpdf/3.04+git20210103-2

2021-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #984494 [release.debian.org] unblock: xpdf/3.04+git20210103-2 Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 984494: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984494 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#983908: marked as done (unblock: terminews/1.2.1-1)

2021-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 4 Mar 2021 10:04:15 +0100 with message-id <3ca2dac8-1d1f-7fac-3b7e-fc4bd1e43...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#983908: unblock: terminews/1.2.1-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #983908, regarding unblock: terminews/1.2.1-1 to be marked as done. This means that you

Bug#983340: marked as done (unblock/preapproval: perl/5.32.1-3 with cross build fixes)

2021-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 4 Mar 2021 10:01:41 +0100 with message-id <17bf2e9e-b829-1bb8-e996-c9b6da8a1...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#983340: unblock/preapproval: perl/5.32.1-3 with cross build fixes has caused the Debian Bug report #983340, regarding unblock/preapproval: perl/5.32.1-3

Processed: Re: Bug#983499: unblock: python3-defaults/3.9.2~rc1-1, python3.9/3.9.2~rc1-1

2021-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tag -1 moreinfo Bug #983499 [release.debian.org] unblock: python3-defaults/3.9.2~rc1-1, python3.9/3.9.2~rc1-1 Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #983499 to the same tags previously set -- 983499: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983499 Debian

Bug#983499: unblock: python3-defaults/3.9.2~rc1-1, python3.9/3.9.2~rc1-1

2021-03-04 Thread Paul Gevers
Control: tag -1 moreinfo Hi Stefano, On 25-02-2021 07:17, Stefano Rivera wrote: > Please unblock package python3-defaults and python3.9 The python3-defaults package is currently blocked by autopkgtest regressions. As usual, I suspect these are transient failures (either infrastructure or flaky

Bug#982480: marked as done (unblock: manpages-l10n/4.9.2-1)

2021-03-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Thu, 4 Mar 2021 09:53:44 +0100 with message-id <07a81369-92b6-ac42-ceac-6e4a9cfeb...@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#982480: unblock: manpages-l10n/4.9.2-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #982480, regarding unblock: manpages-l10n/4.9.2-1 to be marked as done. This means