Hi Paul !
Le lundi 08 mars 2021 à 22:17 +0100, Paul Gevers a écrit :
> On 08-03-2021 13:19, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > This is a pre-approval request for unblocking package octave, version
> > 6.2.0-1
> >
> > Currently, bullseye contains a hand-crafted mercurial snapshot of octave.
> >
Processing changes file: fwupdate-amd64-signed_12+4+deb10u2_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: fwupdate-arm64-signed_12+4+deb10u2_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: fwupdate-i386-signed_12+4+deb10u2_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Processing changes file: libbsd_0.9.1-2+deb10u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libbsd_0.9.1-2+deb10u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libbsd_0.9.1-2+deb10u1_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libbsd_0.9.1-2+deb10u1_armhf-buildd.changes
Hello,
On Mon 08 Mar 2021 at 04:55PM -07, Sean Whitton wrote:
> On Thu 04 Mar 2021 at 09:00PM +01, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>
>> cpl-plugin-hawki-calib is a downloader package and needs to be moved to
>> contrib. All other cpl-plugin-*-calib packages are already in contrib.
>
> I just reached
Hello,
On Thu 04 Mar 2021 at 09:00PM +01, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> cpl-plugin-hawki-calib is a downloader package and needs to be moved to
> contrib. All other cpl-plugin-*-calib packages are already in contrib.
I just reached this package during NEW processing. Could we get a
release team
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
I have submitted an update for the gsoap package, back-porting several
fixes for CVEs from upstream. It fixes the RC bug:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983596
Due to
On 2021-03-08 18:54:22 [+0100], Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi,
Hi,
> Please upload to unstable. As said, we'll let it age a bit there.
Thanks, uploaded.
> Paul
Sebastian
I somehow missed that libbsd produces a udeb when I was processing
stable-new, so CCing KiBi and -boot now.
Regards,
Adam
On Wed, 2021-03-03 at 12:05 +0100, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
> Tags: buster
>
Control: tags -1 confirmed
On 2021-03-04 11:59:35 +0100, Ferenc Wágner wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package libqb
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> Upstream made a new minor release of
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #984501 [release.debian.org] unblock: libqb/2.0.3-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
984501: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984501
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing changes file: avahi_0.7-4+deb10u1_mips64el-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Sébastien,
On 08-03-2021 13:19, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> This is a pre-approval request for unblocking package octave, version 6.2.0-1
>
> Currently, bullseye contains a hand-crafted mercurial snapshot of octave.
> Uploading a snapshot was made necessary because
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #984788 [release.debian.org] (pre-approval) unblock: octave/6.2.0-1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
984788: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984788
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
Thanks
please unblock firmware-nonfree 20210208-3
it is the version that has the relevant firmware packages for
the targeted version of linux in bullseye.
It will need a small amount of fixes on top that are preprared
in git and will be uploaded as soon it has
Processing changes file: avahi_0.7-4+deb10u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: avahi_0.7-4+deb10u1_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: avahi_0.7-4+deb10u1_armhf-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: avahi_0.7-4+deb10u1_i386-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: avahi_0.7-4+deb10u1_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-latest_105+deb10u10_all.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-latest_105+deb10u10_armel-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-latest_105+deb10u10_s390x.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: libbsd_0.9.1-2+deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: ruby-mechanize_2.7.6-1+deb10u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 983113 = buster pending
Bug #983113 [release.debian.org] buster-pu:
package release.debian.org
tags 983918 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: libbsd
Version: 0.9.1-2+deb10u1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 983918 = buster pending
Bug #983918 [release.debian.org] buster-pu:
package release.debian.org
tags 983113 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: ruby-mechanize
Version:
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tag 984635 - moreinfo
Bug #984635 [release.debian.org] unblock: tqdm/4.57.0-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
984635:
Hi
On 08-03-2021 20:50, maximilian attems wrote:
> so please unblock firmware-nonfree 20210208-3
Please file a bug, as this message has a high chance to get lost (the
volume of traffic is rising) as it's not actionable right now.
Paul
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi disagrees. The
> release team uses this list as the canonical source for the
> implementation for the automatic blocks.
so please unblock firmware-nonfree 20210208-3
it is the version that has the relevant firmware packages for
the targeted
Your message dated Mon, 8 Mar 2021 20:47:17 +0100
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#984679: unblock elfutils/0.183-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #984679,
regarding pre-approval: unblock elfutils/0.183-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Processing changes file: avahi_0.7-4+deb10u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: fwupdate_12-4+deb10u2_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-latest_105+deb10u10_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linux-signed-amd64_4.19.177+1_source.changes
ACCEPT
package release.debian.org
tags 982796 = buster pending
thanks
Hi,
The upload referenced by this bug report has been flagged for acceptance into
the proposed-updates queue for Debian buster.
Thanks for your contribution!
Upload details
==
Package: avahi
Version: 0.7-4+deb10u1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> package release.debian.org
Limiting to bugs with field 'package' containing at least one of
'release.debian.org'
Limit currently set to 'package':'release.debian.org'
> tags 982796 = buster pending
Bug #982796 [release.debian.org] buster-pu:
Hi maks,
On 08-03-2021 19:46, maximilian attems wrote:
> non-free packages were never considered key by Debian afair.
https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi disagrees. The
release team uses this list as the canonical source for the
implementation for the automatic blocks.
Paul
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 06:52:33PM +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 08-03-2021 10:39, maximilian attems wrote:
> > Tomorrow once firmware-nonfree has migrated 20210208-4 will be uploaded
> > with important small fixes to Raspberry Pi 4B and BananaPi M2 ultra and
> > BananaPi M3 supports. As all
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:45 AM Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> currently we have 4 bugreports open regarding input methods:
>
> #983704 Switch to fcitx5 for Simplified and Traditional Chinese desktop
> #941624 Recommending ibus breaks fcitx
> #983653 task-japanese-gnome-desktop: no Japanese
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 confirmed
Bug #983071 [release.debian.org] unblock: xz-utils/5.2.5-1.1
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
983071: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983071
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi,
On 04-03-2021 12:32, Paul Gevers wrote:
> What I *think* we're going to do is accept the package in unstable, but
> have it age a bit in unstable before unblocking (which is going to
> happen automatically due to the hard freeze).
Please upload to unstable. As
Hi,
On 08-03-2021 10:39, maximilian attems wrote:
> Tomorrow once firmware-nonfree has migrated 20210208-4 will be uploaded
> with important small fixes to Raspberry Pi 4B and BananaPi M2 ultra and
> BananaPi M3 supports. As all changes are quite small and current window
> allows important fixes,
Processing changes file: gnome-chemistry-utils_0.14.17-6_source.changes
REJECT
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 11:52 PM Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> Am 8. März 2021 16:34:54 MEZ schrieb Shengjing Zhu :
> >I just looked at tasksel, but it seems it's not straightforward to
> >implement,
> >1. install ibus for GNOME
> >2. install other input method for DE except GNOME.
> >Since it's seems
Am 8. März 2021 16:34:54 MEZ schrieb Shengjing Zhu :
>I just looked at tasksel, but it seems it's not straightforward to
>implement,
>1. install ibus for GNOME
>2. install other input method for DE except GNOME.
>Since it's seems hard to express all DE without GNOME, except
>enumerating them?
I
Hi,
I noticed that you've uploaded 0.14.17-6 to stable:
Base version: gnome-chemistry-utils_0.14.17-1.1
Target version: gnome-chemistry-utils_0.14.17-6
[...]
18 files changed, 12939 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
diff -Nru gnome-chemistry-utils-0.14.17/debian/changelog
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 6:39 PM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:05 PM Holger Wansing wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Shengjing Zhu wrote (Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:14:26 +0800):
> > > IMO, we have 3 choice here:
> > >
> > > 1. All languages in tasksel should have a separate task for
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> submitter 981664 rol...@debian.org
Bug #981664 [release.debian.org] buster-pu: package privoxy/3.0.28-2
Changed Bug submitter to 'rol...@debian.org' from 'Roland Rosenfeld
'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need
Processing control commands:
> reopen -1
Bug #984648 {Done: Paul Gevers } [release.debian.org]
unblock: packages with unversioned python dependencies
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #984648 to the same values
previously set
--
984648:
Control: reopen -1
there are more packages to fix/unblock:
- b-d on python-dev,
#942912, bagel, has a fix in the VCS
- #942960, announced NMU, but never NMU'd
now fixed in catch/1.12.1-1.1
- #936950, link-checker, reopened
- apertium-arg-cat, filed new #984785
fixed in 0.2.0-2
Hi release team!
In the meantime privoxy 3.0.32 was released, which contains five more
CVEs, I applied four of them to 3.0.28-2+deb10u1.patch-v4 now, while
CVE-2021-20274 applies to code, that was introduced in 3.0.29, so
doesn't affect buster.
An updated version of my patch is attached.
Hi,
Here is an updated debdiff per the security team advice adding also
changes from the original request.
Adding fixes for:
Fix open redirect if Adminer is accessible at //adminer.php%2F@
https://github.com/vrana/adminer/commit/6a2de873e194cf4bf3f2edb489ba98580a17a632
Fix XSS if Adminer is
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Hi,
see https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984703.
The Security Team suggests to fix this via the next point release
instead of a DSA, so here it is :-)
Diff:
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 02:50:18PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>
>
> On 2021, മാർച്ച് 8 1:24:48 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro
> wrote:
[...]
> >I don't think that will be needed. I reverted to 5.0.0 locally, added a
> >few patches, and at least all of our reverse dependencies seem to pass
> >their
On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 5:05 PM Holger Wansing wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Shengjing Zhu wrote (Mon, 8 Mar 2021 13:14:26 +0800):
> > IMO, we have 3 choice here:
> >
> > 1. All languages in tasksel should have a separate task for GNOME, and
> > a separate task for other DE.
> >
> >The GNOME task
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz 于2021年3月8日周一 下午5:57写道：
>
> Hello YunQiang!
>
> On 3/8/21 10:50 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
> > I upload the cur exp version to unstable with 2 days delay.
>
> That's probably not such a good idea at this point of the release.
>
> You should better check back with the release
Tomorrow once firmware-nonfree has migrated 20210208-4 will be uploaded
with important small fixes to Raspberry Pi 4B and BananaPi M2 ultra and
BananaPi M3 supports. As all changes are quite small and current window
allows important fixes, I do not expect to need an unblock.
best,
--
maks
On 2021, മാർച്ച് 8 1:24:48 AM IST, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 11:01:16PM +0530, Pirate Praveen wrote:
>> [adding release team]
>>
>> On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:49 pm, Utkarsh Gupta wrote:
>> > Hi Praveen,
>> >
>> > On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 10:15 PM Pirate Praveen
>> >
Your message dated Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:45:29 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#984740: nmu: cnrun_2.1.0-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #984740,
regarding nmu: cnrun_2.1.0-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the
Your message dated Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:44:35 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#984739: nmu: singular_1:4.1.2-p1+ds-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #984739,
regarding nmu: singular_1:4.1.2-p1+ds-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:43:21 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#984738: nmu: eeshow_0.git20170731-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #984738,
regarding nmu: eeshow_0.git20170731-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If
Your message dated Mon, 8 Mar 2021 10:42:14 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#984737: nmu: mupen64plus-video-glide64mk2_2.5.9-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #984737,
regarding nmu: mupen64plus-video-glide64mk2_2.5.9-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
54 matches
Mail list logo
