Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
Please unblock package kio
Backport of fix for upstream bug https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439477
from merge request
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-qt-...@lists.debian.org
Please unblock package okular
[ Reason ]
The json definition for the fictionbook book format currently uses the
same identification string as
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
[ Reason ]
Security fix for CVE-2021-35525.
[ Impact ]
Package is vulnerable to a potential DoS attack.
[ Tests ]
The version in buster didn't have any integration tests nor
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package postsrsd
[ Reason ]
Security fix for CVE-2021-35525.
[ Impact ]
Package is vulnerable to a potential DoS attack.
[ Tests ]
Tests from upstream backported,
Hi,
On 12-07-2021 01:20, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 11, 2021 at 09:58:30PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>> On 11-07-2021 21:47, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
>>> It's going to be tricky to get this resolved in time before the removal of
>>> lintian-brush from testing.
>>
>> Can you elaborate why
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 1:54 AM Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 20:16 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> > That feels over-engineering/energy-wasting.
>
> Another option would be to search the source code, and these findings
> would need to be confirmed using grep, but looking at
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 2:02 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 1:54 AM Paul Wise wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 20:16 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> >
> > > That feels over-engineering/energy-wasting.
> >
> > Another option would be to search the source code, and these
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2021 19:59:22 +0200
with message-id <1493ac0f-ecbc-9e98-3981-d73c2dff1...@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#990939: unblock: newlisp/10.7.5-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #990939,
regarding unblock: newlisp/10.7.5-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you
On Wed, 2021-07-14 at 20:16 +0800, Shengjing Zhu wrote:
> That feels over-engineering/energy-wasting.
Another option would be to search the source code, and these findings
would need to be confirmed using grep, but looking at codesearch:
Hi Adrian, all,
On 21-07-11 06:45:07, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Please unblock package mat2
>
> * debian/patches:
> - Pull in upstream patch to improve support of Open XML (xlsx) files.
> (change by Georg Faerber)
>
> Oneline change, autopkgtest pass.
>
> Maintainer is in Cc, ack/nak would be
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ken...@xdump.org
Please unblock package collectd
[ Reason ]
Fix https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=982294
If collection3 is set up(not enabled by default),
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:28:02 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock frr
has caused the Debian Bug report #991101,
regarding unblock: frr/7.5.1-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:29:34 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debmirror
has caused the Debian Bug report #990967,
regarding unblock: debmirror/1:2.35
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:20:19 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock nova
has caused the Debian Bug report #991063,
regarding unblock: nova/22.0.1-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:17:55 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock debconf
has caused the Debian Bug report #990970,
regarding unblock: debconf/1.5.77
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:15:11 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock mruby
has caused the Debian Bug report #991093,
regarding unblock: mruby/2.1.2-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:16:26 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock gtk-layer-shell
has caused the Debian Bug report #991090,
regarding unblock: gtk-layer-shell/0.5.2-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:14:10 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock foxtrotgps
has caused the Debian Bug report #991094,
regarding unblock: foxtrotgps/1.2.2+bzr330-1: imagemagick FTBFS, gpsd API usage
fix
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Wed, 14 Jul 2021 13:12:30 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock dhelp
has caused the Debian Bug report #991035,
regarding unblock: dhelp/0.6.27
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 02:45:34PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package frr
>
> * Backport upstream fix for compatibility with the bullseye
> libyang1.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 03:13:13AM +, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 6:12 AM Shengjing Zhu wrote:
>
> > Sadly the std library are statically embedded in all packages built by Go
> > compiler.
> > So if there's security issue in std library, bunch of packages need to be
> >
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package frr
* Backport upstream fix for compatibility with the bullseye
libyang1. (Closes: #990585)
autopkgtest for frr/7.5.1-1.1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package horizon
[ Reason ]
This upload fixes 2 problems. Let me explain.
1/ Don't load user role assignment or groups tabs for non-admins
OpenStack manages access rights
Processing changes file:
shim-helpers-arm64-signed_1+15.4+7~deb10u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
shim-helpers-amd64-signed_1+15.4+7~deb10u1_amd64.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: shim-helpers-i386-signed_1+15.4+7~deb10u1_i386.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linuxptp_1.9.2-1+deb10u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linuxptp_1.9.2-1+deb10u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: linuxptp_1.9.2-1+deb10u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
26 matches
Mail list logo
