Bug#993825: buster-pu: package hdf5/1.10.6+repack-4+deb11u1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi Release team, I'd like to upload a fix for hdf5 1.10.6+repack-4 into stable. [ Reason ] This is a fix for RC bug #992068 which

Bug#993824: transition: libqalculate

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libqalculate.html Please can we go ahead with the auto-libqalculate transition now? The new version is in experimental and has built on

Bug#993823: buster-pu: package clamav/0.103.3+dfsg-0+deb10u1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: buster Severity: normal This is an update of clamav to version 0.103.3 which is considered as a LTS version. It contains only important fixes. The details were documented by upstream at

Bug#993822: bullseye-pu: package clamav/0.103.3+dfsg-0+deb11u1

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Tags: bullseye Severity: normal This is an update of clamav to version 0.103.3 which is considered as a LTS version. It contains only important fixes. The details were documented by upstream at

Bug#993573: transition: libdav1d

Hi, Le lun. 6 sept. 2021 à 17:07, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit : > > Please go ahead > Thanks, uploaded! Best, Dylan

Bug#993809: bullseye-pu: package segemehl/0.3.4-3+deb11u1 (Pre-approval)

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: nil...@debian.org [ Reason ] The package segfauls to !amd64 and !i386 architectures. The version in bullseye does not have autopkgtests, when we added those and

Bug#993796: bullseye-pu: package knot-resolver/5.3.1-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: jakub.ruzi...@nic.cz [ Reason ] Fixing bug #991463 (CVE-2021-40083) - potential DoS. [ Impact ] Vulnerability to DoS attack. [ Tests ] I've tested the fix manually

Bug#993793: bullseye-pu: package reportbug/7.10.3

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Hi, [ Reason ] This fixes the suite names against stable. Note that Sandro Tosi (maintainer of reportbug) agrees that I do this update in Stable. [ Impact ] Can't choose

Bug#992870: transition: GNOME 40 (libmutter-8-0 and friends)

Thanks for the information sorry for the misunderstanding. Get Outlook for iOS From: Simon McVittie Sent: Sunday, September 5, 2021 8:09:24 PM To: Paul Flaherty Cc: 992...@bugs.debian.org <992...@bugs.debian.org>;

Bug#993792: bullseye-pu: package iotop-c/1.17-1

Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bullseye User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu (Please provide enough information to help the release team to judge the request efficiently. E.g. by filling in the sections below.) [ Reason ] There is bug in processing

Processed: Re: Bug#993573: transition: libdav1d

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #993573 [release.debian.org] transition: libdav1d Added tag(s) confirmed. > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-dav1d.html Bug #993573 [release.debian.org] transition: libdav1d Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Bug#993573: transition: libdav1d

Control: tags -1 confirmed Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-dav1d.html On 2021-09-03 11:16:40 +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Dear Release

Bug#993052: transition: tracker

On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:25 AM Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > What's your plan regarding grilo-plugins, kylin-burner and netatalk? Are > you going to NMU them? I won't be able to do the NMUs today. If anyone else would like to, that would be great. Thanks, Jeremy Bicha

Processed: Re: Bug#992616: transition: botan

Processing control commands: > tags -1 confirmed Bug #992616 [release.debian.org] transition: botan Added tag(s) confirmed. -- 992616: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992616 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Bug#992616: transition: botan

Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2021-09-05 18:54:16 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 10:41 AM Sebastian Ramacher > wrote: > > On 2021-08-21 10:49:04 +0200, László Böszörményi wrote: > > > Again a small transition of botan to 2.18.1 version. Reverse > > > dependencies are

Bug#993702: transition: soapysdr

Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-soapysdr.html Control: tags -1 confirmed On 2021-09-05 02:36:51 +0200, Andreas Bombe wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > > Hi

Processed: Re: Bug#993702: transition: soapysdr

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-soapysdr.html Bug #993702 [release.debian.org] transition: soapysdr Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-soapysdr.html'. > tags -1 confirmed Bug #993702

Bug#993052: transition: tracker

On 2021-08-30 23:17:50 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > Control: forwarded -1 > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-tracker.html > > On 2021-08-26 20:02:13 -0400, Jeremy Bicha wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > User:

Bug#992956: bullseye-pu: package modsecurity-crs/3.3.0-1

On Sat, Sep 04, 2021 at 03:17:25PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + confirmed > > On Wed, 2021-08-25 at 16:55 +0200, Alberto Gonzalez Iniesta wrote: > > This [1] security bug was found in modsecurity-crs. > > As stated in #992863 by the security team, a DSA won't be issued > >

Re: 11.1 and 10.11 planning

On 06/09/2021 12:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Hi Adam, Adam D. Barratt (2021-09-06): We've ended up being late with planning 10.11 due to the timing of the bullseye release, and also need to look at getting 11.1 sorted. Traditionally, we've combined stable and oldstable point releases (at 2-

Re: 11.1 and 10.11 planning

On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 12:51:07PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: >Hi, > >We've ended up being late with planning 10.11 due to the timing of the >bullseye release, and also need to look at getting 11.1 sorted. > >Traditionally, we've combined stable and oldstable point releases (at >2- and 4-month

Re: 11.1 and 10.11 planning

Hi Adam, Adam D. Barratt (2021-09-06): > We've ended up being late with planning 10.11 due to the timing of the > bullseye release, and also need to look at getting 11.1 sorted. > > Traditionally, we've combined stable and oldstable point releases (at > 2- and 4-month cadences) while both are

11.1 and 10.11 planning

Hi, We've ended up being late with planning 10.11 due to the timing of the bullseye release, and also need to look at getting 11.1 sorted. Traditionally, we've combined stable and oldstable point releases (at 2- and 4-month cadences) while both are supported. That would still be my preference,