Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20190702+deb10u12_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u3_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 22:00 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-03-24 12:39:55 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > I've added that text to the announcement for the buster point
> > release.
> Thanks.
>
> > If anyone has any changes, please yell ASAP.
>
> The gnutls and perl changes
On 2022-03-24 12:39:55 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> I've added that text to the announcement for the buster point release.
Thanks.
> If anyone has any changes, please yell ASAP.
The gnutls and perl changes are not yet built. I guess this is intended
;)
> Regards,
>
> Adam
Sebastian
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20190702+deb10u12_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
debian-installer-netboot-images_20210731+deb11u3_source.changes
ACCEPT
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 17:55 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> >
> > libtbb2 and libtbb12 contains some common files hence the conflict.
> > I'd rather wait for all the reverse deps to be ready for this
> > transition, compared to going through NEW again due to binary
> > package change.
>
>
On 2022-03-24 11:43:49, M. Zhou wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 13:12 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > >
> > > "I heard from archlinux" is not good enough. I sent you email about
> > > this without getting a reply, then filed #1006920, without getting a
> > > reply, now this incomplete proposal.
On Thu, 2022-03-24 at 13:12 +0100, Paul Gevers wrote:
> >
> > "I heard from archlinux" is not good enough. I sent you email about
> > this without getting a reply, then filed #1006920, without getting a
> > reply, now this incomplete proposal. you may want to look at all the
> > build rdeps
Hello!
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 17:28:49 +0100 Julien Cristau wrote:
> Unfortunate, but I guess we don't have much of a choice, so go ahead.
Okay. I've uploaded the telegram-desktop package and its build
dependency, libtgowt, to proposed-updates (bullseye).
> How often do such incompatible changes
Am Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 02:25:26PM +0100 schrieb Yadd:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> Tags: bullseye
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: pu
>
> [ Reason ]
> node-url-parse is vulnerable to an authorization Bypass Through
> User-Controlled
On Wed, 2022-03-23 at 22:38 +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2022-03-23 17:40:59 [+], Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Right, let's have another go at this then:
> >
> > "
> > OpenSSL signature algorithm check tightening
> > =
> >
> > The
Hi lumin,
On 14-03-2022 02:30, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 13.03.22 21:59, M. Zhou wrote:
I have not tested by myself, but I heard from an archlinux
developer that this API bump breaks a lot packages. And
some upstreams decided to disable or drop tbb support as
a result. I guess we can take
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 994540 - moreinfo
Bug #994540 [release.debian.org] transition: imagemagick
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
994540:
Hi Otto,
On 24-03-2022 04:41, Otto Kekäläinen wrote:
On Thu, Mar 17, 2022 at 4:09 AM Paul Gevers wrote:
..
2023-01-12 - Milestone 1 - Transition and toolchain freeze
2023-02-12 - Milestone 2 - Soft Freeze
2023-03-12 - Milestone 3 - Hard Freeze - for key packages and
15 matches
Mail list logo
