Hi,
On 16/09/22 at 21:35 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Santiago,
>
> On 15-09-2022 09:26, Paul Gevers wrote:
> > I am trying to schedule autopkgtests in unstable on amd64 for all source
> > packages that have one.
>
> All results are now in. Only several test failed due this warning: the known
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 +moreinfo
Bug #1018945 [release.debian.org] transition: libbpf
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
1018945: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018945
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 +moreinfo
Sudip,
I'm adding the moreinfo tag. Feel free to remove the tag when you
think this transition is ready for the Release Team to approve.
Thank you,
Jeremy Bicha
Hi kibi,
On 17-09-2022 01:41, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
A few questions I can think of:
- Is that a good idea in the first place? I think so, sidestepping
temporary issues in unstable looks like a valid usecase?
AFAIK that *is* the most common use of tpu these days (getting things
into
Processing changes file: chromium_105.0.5195.125-1~deb11u1_source.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium_105.0.5195.125-1~deb11u1_all-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file: chromium_105.0.5195.125-1~deb11u1_amd64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Processing changes file:
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2022 09:58:38 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1019239: transition: coq (41 packages involved)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019239,
regarding transition: coq (41 packages involved)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem
Your message dated Sat, 17 Sep 2022 09:59:47 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1019536: transition: coq-elpi and mathcomp-analysis
has caused the Debian Bug report #1019536,
regarding transition: coq-elpi and mathcomp-analysis
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the
7 matches
Mail list logo