On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:34:29PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> The same general problem applies in various "building non-Debian
> embedded Linux filesystem on Debian" situations where the target
> chroot does not contain mkfs.ext4.
In practice, if the root file system is using ext4, the
Hey folks,
Cyril and I are in broad agreement on stuff, just adding a couple of
points...
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 11:44:47PM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>Hi Paul,
>
>Paul Gevers (2023-02-17):
>> Yes, I know the debian-installer is not a done deal, so kibi, please
>> let us know where you
Hi Paul,
Paul Gevers (2023-02-17):
> Yes, I know the debian-installer is not a done deal, so kibi, please
> let us know where you think we stand with d-i (briefly is OK, I know
> you normally report extensively elsewhere) and when you think d-i can
> realistically be in a releasable state.
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:clamav
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: bullseye
Severity: normal
ClamAV upstream released 0.103.8 fixing two CVEs:
- CVE-2023-20032: Fixed a possible remote code execution vulnerability in the
HFS+ file
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:clamav
Bug #1031536 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
clamav/0.103.8+dfsg-0+deb11u1
Added indication that 1031536 affects src:clamav
--
1031536: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031536
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:43:01PM -0700, Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I am not entirely convinced that using current rather than guest
> tools for image building is an anti-pattern. You've been working on
> filesystems for a long time; I've been working on various image
> building projects since my
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: m...@packages.debian.org, Debian Mono Group
, Jo Shields ,
Gabriel Corona , car...@debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:mono
Hi stable release managers,
Please
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:mono
Bug #1031527 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package
mono/6.8.0.105+dfsg-3.3~deb11u1
Added indication that 1031527 affects src:mono
--
1031527: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1031527
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Dear Release Team colleagues, dear Boot team colleagues,
I just sent out a bits from the RT where I'm claiming that bookworm is
in a good state. And now I'm going to be extremely bold now: aim for the
shortest freeze in Debian history. What do people think of the idea to
start picking a
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 02:08:28PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>...
> So enabling what may be
> convenient, but ultimately an anti-pattern is something that hopefully
> in the long-term Debian should be striving towards. Yes, it's
> annoying and and extra work. So is using build chroots if we
> "Theodore" == Theodore Ts'o writes:
Theodore> So enabling what may be convenient, but ultimately an
Theodore> anti-pattern is something that hopefully in the long-term
Theodore> Debian should be trying to *avoid*.
That's certainly true.
I am not entirely convinced that using
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 02:08:28PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> So enabling what may be
> convenient, but ultimately an anti-pattern is something that hopefully
> in the long-term Debian should be striving towards.
Sigh, I managed to invert the sense of what I was trying to say. This
should
On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 08:51:33AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Adrian Bunk writes:
>
> > The image creators could just set the features they enable to what they
> > copied from /etc/mke2fs.conf from the target distribution, a label with
> > a timestamp wouldn'tbring much benefit here.
>
>
Adrian Bunk writes:
> The image creators could just set the features they enable to what they
> copied from /etc/mke2fs.conf from the target distribution, a label with
> a timestamp wouldn'tbring much benefit here.
That's a very good point and I'm embarrassed it wasn't immediately obvious
to
Can I proceed to upload MariaDB 10.5.19 to proposed stable updates?
Hi,
FTP team, please sync the installer from sid to testing, as it seems to
be Installed for all release architectures (9 total, even if mipsel just
went in):
dak copy-installer 20230217
Note: I didn't request a copy for the previous version (20230207) as it
was mostly a canary upload, making
On 2023-02-17 03:08:34 -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> Sebastian Ramacher writes:
>
> >> Because I didn't previously know about this process, all application
> >> packages
> >> that depend on this new library version (all of which come from the same
> >> upstream) have already been uploaded and
Sebastian Ramacher writes:
>> Because I didn't previously know about this process, all application
>> packages
>> that depend on this new library version (all of which come from the same
>> upstream) have already been uploaded and accepted into unstable with build
>> dependencies on the
18 matches
Mail list logo
