On 4/11/23 06:48, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: ows...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:owslib
Please unblock package owslib
It is affected by CVE-2023-27476 reported
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: gl...@packages.debian.org, debian-b...@lists.debian.org,
debian-gl...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:glibc
[ Reason ]
There are multiple fixes in this
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:glibc
Bug #1034548 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package glibc/2.31-13+deb11u6
Added indication that 1034548 affects src:glibc
--
1034548: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034548
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2023 23:19:27 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1034515: unblock: openvswitch/3.1.0-2 (CVE-2023-1668)
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034515,
regarding unblock: openvswitch/3.1.0-2 (CVE-2023-1668)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reopen 1034245
Bug #1034245 {Done: Sebastian Ramacher }
[release.debian.org] pre-approval: unblock: openvswitch/3.1.1 (CVE-2023-1668)
Bug reopened
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #1034245 to the same values
previously set
>
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2023 21:16:44 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock openvswitch
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034245,
regarding pre-approval: unblock: openvswitch/3.1.1 (CVE-2023-1668)
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2023 21:02:33 +
with message-id
and subject line unblock connman
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034533,
regarding unblock: connman/1.41-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 09:41:02PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
> Hi Salvatore,
>
> On 15-04-2023 17:02, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Would you in principle agree on that, imporantly, at this stage of the
> > release? The current debian/changelog is attached.
>
> I'm pretty sure I've
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2023 21:39:38 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1034497: unblock: jekyll/4.3.1+dfsg-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034497,
regarding unblock: jekyll/4.3.1+dfsg-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt
Your message dated Mon, 17 Apr 2023 21:09:48 +0200
with message-id
and subject line Re: Bug#1034380: unblock: opm-models/2022.10+ds-4
has caused the Debian Bug report #1034380,
regarding unblock: opm-models/2022.10+ds-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:connman
X-Debbugs-Cc: conn...@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package connman.
[ Reason ]
Open CVE-2023-28488 in bookworm
[ Impact ]
User is vulnerable for
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:connman
Bug #1034533 [release.debian.org] unblock: connman/1.41-3
Added indication that 1034533 affects src:connman
--
1034533: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034533
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: nag...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:nageru
Please unblock package nageru
Please consider unblocking Nageru 2.2.1-1. It contains a number
of focused fixes,
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:nageru
Bug #1034527 [release.debian.org] unblock: nageru/2.2.1-1
Added indication that 1034527 affects src:nageru
--
1034527: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034527
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: openstack-pkg-to...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:openstack-pkg-tools
Please unblock package openstack-pkg-tools
[ Reason ]
Since we don't have
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:openstack-pkg-tools
Bug #1034518 [release.debian.org] unblock: openstack-pkg-tools/123
Added indication that 1034518 affects src:openstack-pkg-tools
--
1034518: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034518
Debian Bug Tracking System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: openvswi...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:openvswitch
Please unblock package openvswitch
[ Reason ]
The latest upload fixes CVE-2023-1668, that is:
"Remote
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:openvswitch
Bug #1034515 [release.debian.org] unblock: openvswitch/3.1.0-2 (CVE-2023-1668)
Added indication that 1034515 affects src:openvswitch
--
1034515: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034515
Debian Bug Tracking System
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: bullseye
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: proto...@packages.debian.org, g...@debian.org,
debian-secur...@lists.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:protobuf
[ Reason ]
This update aims to fix three
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:protobuf
Bug #1034510 [release.debian.org] bullseye-pu: package protobuf/3.12.4-1+deb11u1
Added indication that 1034510 affects src:protobuf
--
1034510: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034510
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Package: release.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:sdop
X-Debbugs-Cc: s...@packages.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
Please unblock package sdop.
[ Reason ]
The fix for RC bug #1034080 is in the unstable version.
[ Impact ]
The
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:sdop
Bug #1034508 [release.debian.org] unblock: sdop/0.90-2
Added indication that 1034508 affects src:sdop
--
1034508: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034508
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing changes file: guix_1.2.0-4+deb11u1_arm64-buildd.changes
ACCEPT
Am 15.04.2023 um 21:51 schrieb Paul Gevers:
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Patrick,
Thanks.
On 14-04-2023 10:45, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
You may have guessed from the silence (see also our FAQ [1]) that
we're not enthusiastic about mlt. I'm currently leaning towards the
tpu route for
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: libs...@packages.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:libsdl2
I've prepared a libsdl2 update for upstream stable release 2.26.5 and
I'd like to include it in bookworm if
Processing control commands:
> affects -1 + src:libsdl2
Bug #1034505 [release.debian.org] unblock (pre-approval): libsdl2/2.26.5+dfsg-1
Added indication that 1034505 affects src:libsdl2
--
1034505: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1034505
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact
Good morning,
we provide a solution that significantly shortens the audit time, enables
standards control and non-compliance reporting:
● Audits - to check quality or process standards (ISO, 5S, LPA)
● Scheduler - all work can be scheduled and linked to the notification system
● Checklists -
Hi Paul,
Am Sun, Apr 16, 2023 at 10:03:07PM +0200 schrieb Paul Gevers:
On 13-04-2023 22:56, Markus Blatt wrote:
None, because no real code is changed
Can you elaborate why this is needed? I confirm I see nothing of interest.
you are right, there are no real changes in here.
The only
28 matches
Mail list logo
